Muslim extremists have beheaded 4 Christians who defected from Islam.
The video of the news report can be found HERE. Commentary follows.
Don't believe those who claim that Islam is a harmless 'religion of peace.'
Showing posts with label Islamic extremists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islamic extremists. Show all posts
Saturday, September 05, 2009
Sunday, July 19, 2009
The Most Shocking Thing You Will Read Today
Get set, my friends, for this special report from Pamela Geller at Atlas Shrugs.
Be warned, however. The details in this report are shocking, gruesome, and not for young eyes.
I know of no other more reliable source of first-hand information on the worldwide Jihad than Pamela Geller. And, she will tell the truth about extremist Muslim Jihadists like no other.
You must read this report about a little-known practice within the extremist Islamic community which shows just how thorough is the barbarism that flows through its ranks.
Brace yourselves, and click the link provided above.
Be warned, however. The details in this report are shocking, gruesome, and not for young eyes.
I know of no other more reliable source of first-hand information on the worldwide Jihad than Pamela Geller. And, she will tell the truth about extremist Muslim Jihadists like no other.
You must read this report about a little-known practice within the extremist Islamic community which shows just how thorough is the barbarism that flows through its ranks.
Brace yourselves, and click the link provided above.
Saturday, June 13, 2009
Muslim Detractor Gives Obama Slam-Dunk!
Wafa Sultan, who was raised in an environment of extremist Islam but now speaks against it, has written a MUST-read that issues a slam-dunk to Barack Obama.
Her words are both an inspiration and a powerful reminder that people who live under oppression can emerge strong, articulate, and very brave.
Read it all here.
Her words are both an inspiration and a powerful reminder that people who live under oppression can emerge strong, articulate, and very brave.
Read it all here.
Saturday, February 21, 2009
MUSLIM HEAD CHOPPERS STRIKE AGAIN
Within the last week we have witnessed extremist Islam rear its ugly head around the world as the head-choppers ratcheted up their activity.
First, it was in the United States as a Muslim TV station owner beheaded his wife in what is being described in Islam as an 'honor killing.' The woman was seeking a divorce from her abusive husband, according to co-workers.
Then, a journalist covering a rally in Pakistan was shot and beheaded by Islamic extremists just after the Pakistani government agreed to allow the Taliban in the Swat Valley of the country to restore Sharia Law in the area.
However, this is only the tip of the iceberg. As you will see by reading this thorough pictorial report provided by Atlas , the devaluing of women, including severe physical and emotional abuse, as well as 'honor killing,' is fairly widespread among Muslim populations around the world.
The pictures and stories of the women highlighted by Atlas are only a very small sampling. And, in our politically correct world of totally overlooking the carnage and barbarism of Islam, the movers and shakers in government and the mainstream media are engaging in implicit approval of this kind of intolerable behavior.
First, it was in the United States as a Muslim TV station owner beheaded his wife in what is being described in Islam as an 'honor killing.' The woman was seeking a divorce from her abusive husband, according to co-workers.
Then, a journalist covering a rally in Pakistan was shot and beheaded by Islamic extremists just after the Pakistani government agreed to allow the Taliban in the Swat Valley of the country to restore Sharia Law in the area.
However, this is only the tip of the iceberg. As you will see by reading this thorough pictorial report provided by Atlas , the devaluing of women, including severe physical and emotional abuse, as well as 'honor killing,' is fairly widespread among Muslim populations around the world.
The pictures and stories of the women highlighted by Atlas are only a very small sampling. And, in our politically correct world of totally overlooking the carnage and barbarism of Islam, the movers and shakers in government and the mainstream media are engaging in implicit approval of this kind of intolerable behavior.
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
Muslim Head-Choppers Target Madonna
Jihadists apparently don't know the difference between a genuine Jew and a pop music queen who frivolously studied Kabbalah for a season.
Madonna, of all people, has been targeted for beheading by Islamic extremists due to the Israeli-Gaza conflict.
Jihad Watch reports that the singer is taking the threat very seriously and fears for the safety of her children.
And who wouldn't? These people have proved time and again that absolutely no act of bloodthirsty barbarism is outside their realm of activity.
But Madonna??? Sheesh.
Madonna, of all people, has been targeted for beheading by Islamic extremists due to the Israeli-Gaza conflict.
Jihad Watch reports that the singer is taking the threat very seriously and fears for the safety of her children.
And who wouldn't? These people have proved time and again that absolutely no act of bloodthirsty barbarism is outside their realm of activity.
But Madonna??? Sheesh.
Thursday, July 31, 2008
The Gathering Storm--Winds of War Parts 2 & 3
Part 1 of The Gathering Storm's 'Winds of War' dealt with the subject of the coming civil war in Europe as a result of the present onslaught of Islamofascism across the continent.
In Part 2, the writer explores his contention that such a civil war will inevitably lead to World War III as the U.S. is forced to join the fight in response to the worldwide theater of battle which the Islamofascists will launch.
The 3rd and final part of the series deals with subject of war in America as the writer maintains the inevitability of a massive U.S. backlash against Muslims and Mosques in response to the murders of thousands of U.S. citizens.
This is not reading for the faint of heart, but it is essential reading nonetheless, delineating in stark detail the fight that the West faces against the forces of extremism within Islam.
Click on the links below for Parts 2 and 3 of the series:
The Winds of War--Thinking about the Unthinkable, Part 2: World War III
The Winds of War--Thinking about the Unthinkable, Part 3: War in America
In Part 2, the writer explores his contention that such a civil war will inevitably lead to World War III as the U.S. is forced to join the fight in response to the worldwide theater of battle which the Islamofascists will launch.
The 3rd and final part of the series deals with subject of war in America as the writer maintains the inevitability of a massive U.S. backlash against Muslims and Mosques in response to the murders of thousands of U.S. citizens.
This is not reading for the faint of heart, but it is essential reading nonetheless, delineating in stark detail the fight that the West faces against the forces of extremism within Islam.
Click on the links below for Parts 2 and 3 of the series:
The Winds of War--Thinking about the Unthinkable, Part 2: World War III
The Winds of War--Thinking about the Unthinkable, Part 3: War in America
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
The Gathering Storm--Winds of War in Europe
Winston Churchill once described a 'softening up' process that a nation's enemies undertake in the years prior to a military attack. Churchill was convinced this was what happened to Europe and Great Britain in the years leading up to World War II, as Hitler and others led the West to believe that appeasement was the 'path to peace.'
Under such a subterfuge, nations and citizens are lulled into a false sense of security.
It is then that the enemy strikes with a vengeance, such as Hitler did in invading Poland just after signing a treaty with Britain's Prime Minister Chamberlain promising there would be no more aggression.
Maverick News Media points to a new, 3-part series at The Gathering Storm entitled, 'Winds of War--Thinking About the Unthinkable,' which examines the inevitability of another world war which will be precipitated by the Islamofascist domination of Europe.
The writer contends that the West, particularly Europe, has reached the state of induced slumber, or 'softened up' as Churchill would say, where the enemy succeeds in lulling its prey into a false sense of security with promises of 'peaceful coexistence.'
And all the while the extremist factions within Islam continue to bombard Europe with massive immigration, along with demands for accommodation as no other religious group is given. Inch by inch, step by step, the Islamic extremists undertake their calculated approach toward total dominance.
When the West finally wakes up from its delusional state and realizes what has happened, so intense will be the outrage that war is inevitable, according to the author.
The first article in this 3-part series is entitled, 'Civil War in Europe.' It is a must-read.
But while Europe is 'ground zero' in this new war, it is a big mistake to assume the U.S. is immune from its consequences. The forces in Europe that strive toward the domination of extremist Islam have targeted the U.S. as well.
Under such a subterfuge, nations and citizens are lulled into a false sense of security.
It is then that the enemy strikes with a vengeance, such as Hitler did in invading Poland just after signing a treaty with Britain's Prime Minister Chamberlain promising there would be no more aggression.
Maverick News Media points to a new, 3-part series at The Gathering Storm entitled, 'Winds of War--Thinking About the Unthinkable,' which examines the inevitability of another world war which will be precipitated by the Islamofascist domination of Europe.
The writer contends that the West, particularly Europe, has reached the state of induced slumber, or 'softened up' as Churchill would say, where the enemy succeeds in lulling its prey into a false sense of security with promises of 'peaceful coexistence.'
And all the while the extremist factions within Islam continue to bombard Europe with massive immigration, along with demands for accommodation as no other religious group is given. Inch by inch, step by step, the Islamic extremists undertake their calculated approach toward total dominance.
When the West finally wakes up from its delusional state and realizes what has happened, so intense will be the outrage that war is inevitable, according to the author.
The first article in this 3-part series is entitled, 'Civil War in Europe.' It is a must-read.
But while Europe is 'ground zero' in this new war, it is a big mistake to assume the U.S. is immune from its consequences. The forces in Europe that strive toward the domination of extremist Islam have targeted the U.S. as well.
Friday, July 11, 2008
Muslims Against Sharia Slam Flight 93 Memorial
A group of moderate Muslims called 'Muslims Against Sharia' is bringing out the heavy artillery to blast those who are planning the United Flight 93 Memorial in Pennsylvania.
Incensed by the fact that Islamic symbols are being used in the memorial, Muslims Against Sharia says that a group of extremists have hijacked the building process in order to pay homage to terrorists.
And what is the basis for these claims? The Islamic symbols are being used in spite of the fact that there were NO Muslims on United Flight 93 except for the Jihadist terrorists who hijacked and were responsible for bringing down the plane.
Thus, why would Islamic symbols be a part of that memorial unless the group pushing for their inclusion were attempting to pay homage to the terrorists who died as a result of their own detestable activity?
Muslims Against Sharia is at the forefront of the fight to keep the Islamic symbols OUT of the Flight 93 Memorial. A special event has been organized at the memorial site to protest the inclusion of Muslim symbols.
The innocent victims who died in that crash deserve better. Why would ANYONE want to glorify their murderers?
In addition, moderate Muslims want no part of a memorial that glorifies those within Islam who murder, maim, and butcher.
The protest event will take place on August 2, 2008, in Somerset, Pennsylvania.
For complete information, click HERE for the Muslims Against Sharia website, and click HERE for news about a petition to stop the hijacking of the memorial.
Incensed by the fact that Islamic symbols are being used in the memorial, Muslims Against Sharia says that a group of extremists have hijacked the building process in order to pay homage to terrorists.
And what is the basis for these claims? The Islamic symbols are being used in spite of the fact that there were NO Muslims on United Flight 93 except for the Jihadist terrorists who hijacked and were responsible for bringing down the plane.
Thus, why would Islamic symbols be a part of that memorial unless the group pushing for their inclusion were attempting to pay homage to the terrorists who died as a result of their own detestable activity?
Muslims Against Sharia is at the forefront of the fight to keep the Islamic symbols OUT of the Flight 93 Memorial. A special event has been organized at the memorial site to protest the inclusion of Muslim symbols.
The innocent victims who died in that crash deserve better. Why would ANYONE want to glorify their murderers?
In addition, moderate Muslims want no part of a memorial that glorifies those within Islam who murder, maim, and butcher.
The protest event will take place on August 2, 2008, in Somerset, Pennsylvania.
For complete information, click HERE for the Muslims Against Sharia website, and click HERE for news about a petition to stop the hijacking of the memorial.
Sunday, June 22, 2008
PAMELA GELLER RESPONDS TO ATTACKS
Almost from its inception, The Liberty Sphere blog has consistently linked to news alerts concerning the Jihad and the War on Terror, as provided by Pamela Geller at Atlas Shrugs--one of the top blogs in the nation.
Atlas Shrugs has been an invaluable source of information concerning the fight for the survival of the West. And Geller has proven herself to be a valiant and courageous soldier in this fight.
As with all who are willing to put their very lives on the line for the cause of truth, justice, and liberty, Geller has not been without her share of detractors and critics, which unfortunately include those who see her as such a threat to their subversive and dangerous agenda that they resort to personal attacks, smears, lawsuits, and even death threats.
This is to be expected given that the Jihadists and their sympathizers do not wish for the truth to be told and would love to see the public kept in the dark. An uninformed public is a sitting duck for the attacks of those who wish to destroy not only the fabric of freedom but the very existence of our country and way of life.
Thus, one thing should be made crystal clear--Pamela Geller is not a 'terrorist' simply because she fights terrorism with a passion that scares the true terrorists. She does not run a 'hate site' simply because she blogs about the twisted, insidious, and deadly world-view of Islamic extremists.
Some of those who make such charges brought their blather to this very blog in the comments section of an earlier post. Pamela Geller was kind and gracious enough to come here and give a direct response.
That response was important enough that I thought it merited a whole post unto itself.
Here is what Geller had to say about her beliefs, her goals, her objectives, and her heart:
This is precisely the way I have experienced Pamela Geller and Atlas Shrugs ever since I stumbled upon the blog about a year and a half ago. This is why there is a permanent link to the blog on the left sidebar. And this is why I was honored to have Pamela Geller come here to make a straightforward, clear statement of what motivates her to engage in this battle.
Make no mistake about it, Islamofascisim is a major threat to the freedom of speech, freedom of the Press, freedom of religion, and every other liberty associated with free societies. This is why Canada and much of Europe has succumbed to the dire and ominous moves to place restrictions on freedom of speech.
In nearly every instance, Islamofascism is the shadow-force behind the scenes that drives these restrictions on human liberty. Extremists under the guise of being 'moderate Muslims,' for example, were behind the trial of Mark Steyn and Mclean's Magazine in British Columbia.
For sure, there are many moderate Muslims in the world. But simply because someone says they are moderate does not necessarily make them moderate.
Atlas Shrugs exists to help us make the distinction.
Atlas Shrugs has been an invaluable source of information concerning the fight for the survival of the West. And Geller has proven herself to be a valiant and courageous soldier in this fight.
As with all who are willing to put their very lives on the line for the cause of truth, justice, and liberty, Geller has not been without her share of detractors and critics, which unfortunately include those who see her as such a threat to their subversive and dangerous agenda that they resort to personal attacks, smears, lawsuits, and even death threats.
This is to be expected given that the Jihadists and their sympathizers do not wish for the truth to be told and would love to see the public kept in the dark. An uninformed public is a sitting duck for the attacks of those who wish to destroy not only the fabric of freedom but the very existence of our country and way of life.
Thus, one thing should be made crystal clear--Pamela Geller is not a 'terrorist' simply because she fights terrorism with a passion that scares the true terrorists. She does not run a 'hate site' simply because she blogs about the twisted, insidious, and deadly world-view of Islamic extremists.
Some of those who make such charges brought their blather to this very blog in the comments section of an earlier post. Pamela Geller was kind and gracious enough to come here and give a direct response.
That response was important enough that I thought it merited a whole post unto itself.
Here is what Geller had to say about her beliefs, her goals, her objectives, and her heart:
Everything posted here is wrong. Utterly inaccurate. But hey am not surprised - its the leftist Islamic alliance propagating their memes.Muslims Against Sharia asked me to join them and to chair a committee who's objective is to make honor killing a capital crime. I was unaware of their group but thought what they wanted to do was admirable and important. Islam must be reformed from within. I love everyone that fights on the side of truth, justice and the American way. I fight the jihad and consider myself most fortunate to count amongst my friends Wafa Sultan, Ibn Warraq, Andrew Bostom, Youssef Ibrahim, Walid Phares, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Dr. Patrick Sookhdeo, Sam Solomon. I am against the coming holocaust against the Jews. I am against FGM, honor killings and the sub class citizenship of women in Islamic countries. I fight the jihad - that is my fight.To address your charges of racism and islamophobia is a canard. I can't prove a negative. It is obvious you do not read my blog or understand why I do what I do. I fight for the individual and the basic tenets of western civilization. You can avoid evil but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding evil.I and the folks that work with me intend to save America. You're either with us or against.
This is precisely the way I have experienced Pamela Geller and Atlas Shrugs ever since I stumbled upon the blog about a year and a half ago. This is why there is a permanent link to the blog on the left sidebar. And this is why I was honored to have Pamela Geller come here to make a straightforward, clear statement of what motivates her to engage in this battle.
Make no mistake about it, Islamofascisim is a major threat to the freedom of speech, freedom of the Press, freedom of religion, and every other liberty associated with free societies. This is why Canada and much of Europe has succumbed to the dire and ominous moves to place restrictions on freedom of speech.
In nearly every instance, Islamofascism is the shadow-force behind the scenes that drives these restrictions on human liberty. Extremists under the guise of being 'moderate Muslims,' for example, were behind the trial of Mark Steyn and Mclean's Magazine in British Columbia.
For sure, there are many moderate Muslims in the world. But simply because someone says they are moderate does not necessarily make them moderate.
Atlas Shrugs exists to help us make the distinction.
Friday, June 20, 2008
Dark Storm Clouds Gather Over America
As never before since World War II, America faces one of her darkest hours as the storm clouds gather from a myriad of sources intent on destroying the notion of a free, constitutional Republic.
The problem is that this time around, the threat is much worse.
During WW II the threat was from the outside as totalitarian forces pressed against us from both the East and the West. Europe and Japan were a formidable foe, but Americans stood fast upon the principles of liberty.
Today, however, the threat is two-fold. The threat is both from the outside and the inside.
At the same time that terrorism poses a significant threat to the stability and existence of the West, America is faced with the prospects of being forced to fight some of its own citizens who are infected with the single-headed notion of subverting the Constitution and declaring that no right is absolute or guaranteed.
Numerous free speech cases prove the point, as well as the current national debate on Second Amendment rights about which the U.S. Supreme Court will issue a decision this month.
As the nation fights for its survival on these crucial fronts, we are hit broadside simultaneously with a brazen attempt by Democrats in Congress to embark upon a course of action which we as a nation have always rejected outright as antithetical to freedom and human liberty--the attempt to nationalize the oil industry.
America was founded upon the principles of a free society. This means that markets and business and industrial enterprises are to be free. Government has never been viewed in this country as an acceptable proprietor. Rather, government has always been viewed as an impartial referee to private enterprise, making sure that all business interests play by the same rules.
Central to the concept of a free society is the importance of the limited role of government. Men and women through the centuries who sought liberty after having suffered from the cruel and inhuman oppression of powerful government insisted that the only legitimate role of government was to protect the liberties inherent to human beings--liberties that are God-given.
For government to become involved in the ownership and operation of what private enterprise can do on its own has always been considered illegitimate. When government gets into the business of proprietorship, human liberty always suffers in the end.
Yet some of the major leaders in the majority Party in Congress insist that this is precisely where they wish to take the country. They want government to get into the business of owning and operating business.
This overt socialistic notion is echoed by many in modern academia. In fact, this has been their goal since the 1960s when radicals decided that private enterprise is evil and government is good.
Not only that, but some voices within academia, in addition to a few major columnists that publish in the mainstream media, have openly called for limitations on free speech. As a member of the Canadian Human Rights Commission in British Columbia said in the Mark Steyn trial, 'Freedom of speech is an American concept and thus, I have no interest in it.'
This was in Canada, true enough. But some Americans are echoing these sentiments by stating that perhaps our country is worse off because it allows freedom of speech, and thus, we would be much better off placing restrictions upon it, just as our Canadian and European neighbors are doing.
It is not mere chance that at the very same time we face these significant threats to our very way of life, along comes a political candidate with rock star status, the followers of whom often compare to a heaven-sent Messiah.
This candidate has embraced positions throughout his short career in Illinois and the U.S. Senate that fall perfectly in line with the various schemes launched by other members of his Party to restrict human liberty and downplay the significance and preeminence of the Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution.
It is not coincidental that Barack Obama is bankrolled by one George Soros, the atheistic billionaire and Democrat party operative. Soros is a one-man dark cloud machine in his own right, casting a long shadow of foreboding on all that he touches. He is anti-free markets, anti-liberty, anti-Constitution, anti-Christian and Jew, and anti-American.
And with regard to Obama, Soros is the power behind the throne.
If Obama is elected, Soros will have completed at least 75% of what he set out to do--control the Democratic Party, get one of his gophers elected to the Presidency, and make sure his foot soldiers in the American version of the Bolshevik Revolution stay in power in Congress.
At that point all he has left to do is to use his comrades in the government to ram through Congress the single largest shift in ideology and policy to take place in America since founding of the Republic. And he will have absolutely no opposition from the President or the minority Party since the GOP is expected to lose even more seats in both the House and Senate.
Alarmist nonsense, you say? Just wait until you see the next installment in this series which will examine Barack Obama's ties to George Soros and extremist Muslim Jihadists, including Hamas and Hezbollah.
The problem is that this time around, the threat is much worse.
During WW II the threat was from the outside as totalitarian forces pressed against us from both the East and the West. Europe and Japan were a formidable foe, but Americans stood fast upon the principles of liberty.
Today, however, the threat is two-fold. The threat is both from the outside and the inside.
At the same time that terrorism poses a significant threat to the stability and existence of the West, America is faced with the prospects of being forced to fight some of its own citizens who are infected with the single-headed notion of subverting the Constitution and declaring that no right is absolute or guaranteed.
Numerous free speech cases prove the point, as well as the current national debate on Second Amendment rights about which the U.S. Supreme Court will issue a decision this month.
As the nation fights for its survival on these crucial fronts, we are hit broadside simultaneously with a brazen attempt by Democrats in Congress to embark upon a course of action which we as a nation have always rejected outright as antithetical to freedom and human liberty--the attempt to nationalize the oil industry.
America was founded upon the principles of a free society. This means that markets and business and industrial enterprises are to be free. Government has never been viewed in this country as an acceptable proprietor. Rather, government has always been viewed as an impartial referee to private enterprise, making sure that all business interests play by the same rules.
Central to the concept of a free society is the importance of the limited role of government. Men and women through the centuries who sought liberty after having suffered from the cruel and inhuman oppression of powerful government insisted that the only legitimate role of government was to protect the liberties inherent to human beings--liberties that are God-given.
For government to become involved in the ownership and operation of what private enterprise can do on its own has always been considered illegitimate. When government gets into the business of proprietorship, human liberty always suffers in the end.
Yet some of the major leaders in the majority Party in Congress insist that this is precisely where they wish to take the country. They want government to get into the business of owning and operating business.
This overt socialistic notion is echoed by many in modern academia. In fact, this has been their goal since the 1960s when radicals decided that private enterprise is evil and government is good.
Not only that, but some voices within academia, in addition to a few major columnists that publish in the mainstream media, have openly called for limitations on free speech. As a member of the Canadian Human Rights Commission in British Columbia said in the Mark Steyn trial, 'Freedom of speech is an American concept and thus, I have no interest in it.'
This was in Canada, true enough. But some Americans are echoing these sentiments by stating that perhaps our country is worse off because it allows freedom of speech, and thus, we would be much better off placing restrictions upon it, just as our Canadian and European neighbors are doing.
It is not mere chance that at the very same time we face these significant threats to our very way of life, along comes a political candidate with rock star status, the followers of whom often compare to a heaven-sent Messiah.
This candidate has embraced positions throughout his short career in Illinois and the U.S. Senate that fall perfectly in line with the various schemes launched by other members of his Party to restrict human liberty and downplay the significance and preeminence of the Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution.
It is not coincidental that Barack Obama is bankrolled by one George Soros, the atheistic billionaire and Democrat party operative. Soros is a one-man dark cloud machine in his own right, casting a long shadow of foreboding on all that he touches. He is anti-free markets, anti-liberty, anti-Constitution, anti-Christian and Jew, and anti-American.
And with regard to Obama, Soros is the power behind the throne.
If Obama is elected, Soros will have completed at least 75% of what he set out to do--control the Democratic Party, get one of his gophers elected to the Presidency, and make sure his foot soldiers in the American version of the Bolshevik Revolution stay in power in Congress.
At that point all he has left to do is to use his comrades in the government to ram through Congress the single largest shift in ideology and policy to take place in America since founding of the Republic. And he will have absolutely no opposition from the President or the minority Party since the GOP is expected to lose even more seats in both the House and Senate.
Alarmist nonsense, you say? Just wait until you see the next installment in this series which will examine Barack Obama's ties to George Soros and extremist Muslim Jihadists, including Hamas and Hezbollah.
Wednesday, April 02, 2008
Second Amendment News Roundup for 4/2/08
Focusing on guns and politics, here is today's Second Amendment News Roundup:
Mike McCarville has a special announcement about helping Americans who serve in the Middle East. This is an important project, so head on over there and read it, and consider donating:
http://wwwtmrcom.blogspot.com/2008/03/hugs-project-needs-cash-donations.html
JR blogs on the Maxpedition Fatboy Versipack, which can carry your hardware very nicely:
http://akeyboardanda45.blogspot.com/2008/04/maxpedition-fatboy-versipack.html
I like the way this man thinks. Jack Pribek has a goodie on smoking bans. Yeah, what he said!!:
http://pribek.net/2008/04/02/study-shows-that-smoking-bans-are-deadly/
Can you say, 'Are we surprised?' Dustin reports that the antis are already calling hunting rifles 'sniper rifles.' What a big surprise:
http://dustinsgunblog.blogspot.com/2008/04/anti-gun-folks-already-calling-hunting.html
FreedomSight says the Department of Defense is spying on U.S. citizens:
http://freedomsight.net/?p=2388
Nicki comments on the failure of Oklahoma to allow concealed carry on campuses:
http://libertyzone.blogspot.com/2008/04/oklahoma-schools-will-remain-safe-haven.html
We are known by the company we keep, and Sebastian says that the American Hunters and Shooters Association (otherwise known as the 'wolves in sheep's clothes) is supporting Obama:
http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/04/02/ahsa-on-obama/
ROFL! Uncle reports that even some of the people on Barack Obama's campaign team are beginning to realize that beneath the fluff there is no substance:
http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/04/02/no_chewy_center/
The Volokh Conspiracy posts 'What the Next President Can Do to Protect Property Rights':
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_03_30-2008_04_05.shtml#1207162479
Eugene Volokh also reports that the U.N.'s so-called 'human rights council' (what a joke) has called for further suppression of free speech:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_03_30-2008_04_05.shtml#1207157234
Volokh also reports that Senator Arlen Specter, R-PA, has threatened to shut down the Senate if the Democrats continue to hold up votes on President Bush's judicial nominees:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_03_30-2008_04_05.shtml#1207156002
David Codrea has this thought-provoking read today:
http://waronguns.blogspot.com/2008/04/enemy-of-good.html
Armed and Safe blogs on the good news out of Pennsylvania today:
http://armedandsafe.blogspot.com/2008/04/pa-blame-victim-legislation-dies-richly.html
Blogstitution has an excellent read on the courage of a Dutch politician in releasing a film critical of Islamic extremists:
http://www.blogstitution.com/2008/04/fitna/
Mike McCarville has a special announcement about helping Americans who serve in the Middle East. This is an important project, so head on over there and read it, and consider donating:
http://wwwtmrcom.blogspot.com/2008/03/hugs-project-needs-cash-donations.html
JR blogs on the Maxpedition Fatboy Versipack, which can carry your hardware very nicely:
http://akeyboardanda45.blogspot.com/2008/04/maxpedition-fatboy-versipack.html
I like the way this man thinks. Jack Pribek has a goodie on smoking bans. Yeah, what he said!!:
http://pribek.net/2008/04/02/study-shows-that-smoking-bans-are-deadly/
Can you say, 'Are we surprised?' Dustin reports that the antis are already calling hunting rifles 'sniper rifles.' What a big surprise:
http://dustinsgunblog.blogspot.com/2008/04/anti-gun-folks-already-calling-hunting.html
FreedomSight says the Department of Defense is spying on U.S. citizens:
http://freedomsight.net/?p=2388
Nicki comments on the failure of Oklahoma to allow concealed carry on campuses:
http://libertyzone.blogspot.com/2008/04/oklahoma-schools-will-remain-safe-haven.html
We are known by the company we keep, and Sebastian says that the American Hunters and Shooters Association (otherwise known as the 'wolves in sheep's clothes) is supporting Obama:
http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/04/02/ahsa-on-obama/
ROFL! Uncle reports that even some of the people on Barack Obama's campaign team are beginning to realize that beneath the fluff there is no substance:
http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/04/02/no_chewy_center/
The Volokh Conspiracy posts 'What the Next President Can Do to Protect Property Rights':
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_03_30-2008_04_05.shtml#1207162479
Eugene Volokh also reports that the U.N.'s so-called 'human rights council' (what a joke) has called for further suppression of free speech:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_03_30-2008_04_05.shtml#1207157234
Volokh also reports that Senator Arlen Specter, R-PA, has threatened to shut down the Senate if the Democrats continue to hold up votes on President Bush's judicial nominees:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_03_30-2008_04_05.shtml#1207156002
David Codrea has this thought-provoking read today:
http://waronguns.blogspot.com/2008/04/enemy-of-good.html
Armed and Safe blogs on the good news out of Pennsylvania today:
http://armedandsafe.blogspot.com/2008/04/pa-blame-victim-legislation-dies-richly.html
Blogstitution has an excellent read on the courage of a Dutch politician in releasing a film critical of Islamic extremists:
http://www.blogstitution.com/2008/04/fitna/
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
Unintended Consequence at Columbia University
The appearance of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on the campus of Columbia University revealed a profound unintended consequence: the 'outing' of Ahmadinejad as the bumbling but dangerous buffoon he really is.
Some would say that the Iranian President's remarks at Columbia on Monday make him look so completely foolish that no one will take him seriously any longer. That would be a big mistake.
No greater danger is posed to the free world than a fool in control of a nation with nuclear power who believes Israel should be blown off the face of the map. If anything, Ahmadinejad revealed to the free world just how how deeply his ignorance influences his values.
Columbia University could not have foreseen these consequences of a terribly ill-informed decision to give one of the faces of modern evil a reputable platform from which to spout his unique form of hate and bigotry. This is the campus that spurns the ROTC and that has withdrawn speaking invitations from major conservative spokespersons.
Thus, Columbia's insistence that its invitation was all about 'free speech' is largely disingenuous. The University does not routinely afford free speech to noted conservative voices, particularly those on the front-lines of the global war on Islamists.
The University is also known for giving a platform to extremist Muslims from which they can deliver the most despicable and vile attacks against Jews and Israel, while refusing to grant to major Jewish voices the opportunity to speak about the dangers of the global Jihad.
And this is totally apart from the fact that it is entirely inappropriate for an American university to provide a megaphone to one of America's sworn enemies during a war.
To be fair, Columbia's President told the ugly truth about Ahmadinejad calmly and systematically in his remarks to introduce the Iranian leader. He is to be commended for his careful, deliberative manner of enumerating the many reasons Ahmadinejad is to be considered a scourge to the world.
But this does not in any way absolve Columbia of its shame and guilt for giving such an individual an opportunity to bask in even more of the world's attention.
As for Ahmadinejad's remarks, perhaps he succeeded in driving a nail into his own coffin by simply opening his mouth at Columbia. He refused to answer directly a question concerning his prior remarks that the Holocaust never happened, that Israel has no right to exist, and that he intends to build and use nuclear bombs to back up his rhetoric.
But perhaps the most telling feature of all was Ahmadinejad's claim that, 'We have no gays in Iran.'
Of course not. When you are the leader of a country that has outlawed homosexual behavior, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the Press, and freedom to assemble; where women are subjugated to the status of a dog--a mere possession of a man; and where liberty itself is considered evil and contrary to the laws of Allah; it is too easy to assume that when you look out the window over your fiefdom you see nothing but purity and harmony.
Vile and despicable human beings who dissent in public or decide to become Catholic, and shameful, godless women who speak their minds, are nowhere to be found.
Detractors, dissenters, and protesters have either been killed or imprisoned. The rest have either fled for their lives or gone underground. But in no way does this mean they do not exist.
Thus, perhaps in some odd way Columbia and Ahmadinejad did us all a favor. We were afforded a rare opportunity to see the backwardness, and the danger, of the mind of a Jihadist at work.
Some would say that the Iranian President's remarks at Columbia on Monday make him look so completely foolish that no one will take him seriously any longer. That would be a big mistake.
No greater danger is posed to the free world than a fool in control of a nation with nuclear power who believes Israel should be blown off the face of the map. If anything, Ahmadinejad revealed to the free world just how how deeply his ignorance influences his values.
Columbia University could not have foreseen these consequences of a terribly ill-informed decision to give one of the faces of modern evil a reputable platform from which to spout his unique form of hate and bigotry. This is the campus that spurns the ROTC and that has withdrawn speaking invitations from major conservative spokespersons.
Thus, Columbia's insistence that its invitation was all about 'free speech' is largely disingenuous. The University does not routinely afford free speech to noted conservative voices, particularly those on the front-lines of the global war on Islamists.
The University is also known for giving a platform to extremist Muslims from which they can deliver the most despicable and vile attacks against Jews and Israel, while refusing to grant to major Jewish voices the opportunity to speak about the dangers of the global Jihad.
And this is totally apart from the fact that it is entirely inappropriate for an American university to provide a megaphone to one of America's sworn enemies during a war.
To be fair, Columbia's President told the ugly truth about Ahmadinejad calmly and systematically in his remarks to introduce the Iranian leader. He is to be commended for his careful, deliberative manner of enumerating the many reasons Ahmadinejad is to be considered a scourge to the world.
But this does not in any way absolve Columbia of its shame and guilt for giving such an individual an opportunity to bask in even more of the world's attention.
As for Ahmadinejad's remarks, perhaps he succeeded in driving a nail into his own coffin by simply opening his mouth at Columbia. He refused to answer directly a question concerning his prior remarks that the Holocaust never happened, that Israel has no right to exist, and that he intends to build and use nuclear bombs to back up his rhetoric.
But perhaps the most telling feature of all was Ahmadinejad's claim that, 'We have no gays in Iran.'
Of course not. When you are the leader of a country that has outlawed homosexual behavior, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the Press, and freedom to assemble; where women are subjugated to the status of a dog--a mere possession of a man; and where liberty itself is considered evil and contrary to the laws of Allah; it is too easy to assume that when you look out the window over your fiefdom you see nothing but purity and harmony.
Vile and despicable human beings who dissent in public or decide to become Catholic, and shameful, godless women who speak their minds, are nowhere to be found.
Detractors, dissenters, and protesters have either been killed or imprisoned. The rest have either fled for their lives or gone underground. But in no way does this mean they do not exist.
Thus, perhaps in some odd way Columbia and Ahmadinejad did us all a favor. We were afforded a rare opportunity to see the backwardness, and the danger, of the mind of a Jihadist at work.
Monday, July 09, 2007
Switzerland the Next Target?
Washington, DC (TLS). Like a drug-resistant infection that slowly spreads its poison throughout a defenseless human victim, the so-called 'religion of peace' has undertaken a relentless, gradual, and systematic plan to spread through Europe and become the dominant force in the region.
The 'Muslim Brotherhood' envisioned this plan decades ago. And with each passing year the plan gains momentum as it builds on the successes of those who have already infiltrated the institutions of society.
The result has been nightly car-bombings in Paris and the suburbs of France. An opera house in Germany was forced to cancel a performance due to threats of violence from Muslims who were 'offended' by one scene in the opera. The Netherlands, Spain, and Belgium have also been targets of the Islamic extremists.
According to the nation's counterterrorism experts, Switzerland could be next.
Switzerland has often escaped the ravages of war and mayhem in the past due to its harsh terrain and its insistence that citizens be armed. However, that has begun to change as a movement within the country has sprung up that wishes to place limits on the firearms rights of citizens.
It is interesting that at the very moment in history that the gun-grabbers zero in on Switzerland, the terrorists suddenly put the nation on their radar screen.
This is no time for Switzerland to change public policy on guns. The citizens may well need them if the counterterrorism experts are correct.
Click here for a complete analysis of the new threat to Switzerland:
http://counterterrorismblog.org/2007/07/print/switzerland_next_target.php
The 'Muslim Brotherhood' envisioned this plan decades ago. And with each passing year the plan gains momentum as it builds on the successes of those who have already infiltrated the institutions of society.
The result has been nightly car-bombings in Paris and the suburbs of France. An opera house in Germany was forced to cancel a performance due to threats of violence from Muslims who were 'offended' by one scene in the opera. The Netherlands, Spain, and Belgium have also been targets of the Islamic extremists.
According to the nation's counterterrorism experts, Switzerland could be next.
Switzerland has often escaped the ravages of war and mayhem in the past due to its harsh terrain and its insistence that citizens be armed. However, that has begun to change as a movement within the country has sprung up that wishes to place limits on the firearms rights of citizens.
It is interesting that at the very moment in history that the gun-grabbers zero in on Switzerland, the terrorists suddenly put the nation on their radar screen.
This is no time for Switzerland to change public policy on guns. The citizens may well need them if the counterterrorism experts are correct.
Click here for a complete analysis of the new threat to Switzerland:
http://counterterrorismblog.org/2007/07/print/switzerland_next_target.php
Thursday, June 21, 2007
New Terror Plot Targets Large East Coast Buildings
Washington, DC (TLS). A report issued by the NEFA Foundation indicates that yet another terrorist plot in the making is targeting large, east coast buildings, striking at the financial heart of the U.S.
Click here to go to the Counterterrorism website and then click on the link there for a detailed pdf file report:
http://counterterrorismblog.org/2007/06/print/new_from_the_nefa_target_ameri.php
Click here to go to the Counterterrorism website and then click on the link there for a detailed pdf file report:
http://counterterrorismblog.org/2007/06/print/new_from_the_nefa_target_ameri.php
Saturday, June 09, 2007
Funds Needed For Blogger Sued by Extremist Muslims
Washington, DC (TLS). Last week The Liberty Sphere sent out an appeal on behalf of a fellow blogger in Florida who is being sued by local Muslims who have connections to overseas Islamic terrorists.
That blogger's name is Bill Warner. In consultation with his attorney, Warner has learned that his legal expenses will be quite substantial in fighting this nationally orchestrated effort by certain Muslims to silence critics of terrorism through the use of lawsuits.
Some are calling their tactic 'the litigation Jihad.'
In short, Bill Warner needs your help. If they can do this to him, they could do the same thing to YOU, ME, and ANY blogger who publishes the truth about extremist Muslims and terrorism.
Pamela Geller has provided complete information over at Atlas Shrugs concerning how to get the donations to Bill's legal defense.
My friends, this is a sincere and earnest plea on behalf of a fellow blogger who is being bullied into silence by Muslims with ties to overseas terrorists. Please click on the link, read the information, and then consider sending a gift toward Bill Warner's legal defense.
Remember, the next time this happens, it may be YOU we are helping!
Click here for more information, and thanks!http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2007/06/help_fight_the_.html
Tuesday, June 05, 2007
UPDATE on New York-Kennedy Terrorist Scare
New York, NY (TLS). The foiled terrorist plot at JFK International Airport in New York City has shed light on the literally thousands of unnoticed methods that terrorists could utilize to attack the United States.
Islamic extremists both inside and outside the U.S. have been very busy at work using various surveillance methods to devise deadly means of using the nation's infrastructure to level an attack.
These include ventilation systems for traffic tunnels, such as the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels, or perhaps the various means by which America's waterways are prevented from flooding major populated areas.
While most Americans' attention is focused on the large landmarks, such as the Sears Tower or the Statue of Liberty, the nation's law enforcement officials are focused on the mundane but vital aspects of the infrastructure while at the same time keeping an eye on the major landmarks.
Read this enlightening update on the New York-Kennedy Airport terrorist scare here:
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070604/D8PIA3DG1.html
Islamic extremists both inside and outside the U.S. have been very busy at work using various surveillance methods to devise deadly means of using the nation's infrastructure to level an attack.
These include ventilation systems for traffic tunnels, such as the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels, or perhaps the various means by which America's waterways are prevented from flooding major populated areas.
While most Americans' attention is focused on the large landmarks, such as the Sears Tower or the Statue of Liberty, the nation's law enforcement officials are focused on the mundane but vital aspects of the infrastructure while at the same time keeping an eye on the major landmarks.
Read this enlightening update on the New York-Kennedy Airport terrorist scare here:
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070604/D8PIA3DG1.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)