You know that the nation is in deep trouble when the most dangerous man in America is the President of the United States.
I know this is a brazen statement. But let's consider the facts.
He has made the decision to close Gitmo prison that houses the most dangerous terrorists in the world. This will mean that these barbarians will be brought to the U.S. mainland to be housed in a prison facility near you, right in your own backyard.
He has decided that overseas sponsors of terror need to be 'understood' and 'listened to.' Not only that, but he has decided America needs to apologize to these terrorist regimes for being responsible for poor relations between the U.S. and the nations involved.
We have nothing to apologize to a terrorist for. And such an act only emboldens terrorists, which we saw with the reaction of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad when he said that Obama's statement proves that the U.S. is now 'in a weakened state.'
Ahmadinejad then proceeded to make demands of the U.S. before Iran would be willing to sit down at the negotiating table with the U.S.
Note that last point carefully. In Obama's world it is not the U.S. that makes demands of a terrorist state prior to diplomatic negotiations but it is the terrorist world that makes demands of the U.S.
And Iran's first demand was that the U.S. cease to be an ally of Israel.
You see, this is precisely what you get when an imbecile sits in the White House.
Not only is Obama setting the stage for nuclear war in the Middle East when Israel has to go it alone to fight for her survival in a region of nations that desire that she be wiped off the map, but he is creating a scenario where terrorists will be coming en mass to our own shores.
We can expect a major terrorist attack on American soil at some point before this monstrosity we have elected leaves office.
Add to that Obama's desire (and that of his new Attorney-General) to disarm average American citizens, and we then have a scenario where the entire country from top to bottom is nothing but a sitting duck not only for thugs, thieves, murderers, and rapists, but terrorists who will unleash their suicide bombs on American streets, just as they have been doing in Israel.
Welcome to Obamaland.
Showing posts with label Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 03, 2009
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Second Amendment News Roundup for 9/23/08
Focusing on guns, politics, and news of interest, here is today's Second Amendment News Roundup:
From Codrea's War on Guns:
*David gives us an update on the latest shenanigans of the JBTs and their changing the definition of 'pistol.'
*Barack Obama opened his mouth and spouted gibberish in Jacksonville, Florida.
*Here is a guy who bursts a few bubbles.
Sebastian follows up on the reclassification issue concerning the term 'pistol' that David mentioned above.
JR posts 'Concealed Carry on College Campuses.'
Breda does an excellent job in exposing young minds to the 'reasonable-ness' of firearms.
Mike McCarville posts 'Obama Struggles to Win Clinton Voters.'
Ahab gives us a preview of tonight's radio show 'Gun Nuts--The Next Generation.' Go over there and see the very interesting topic that he and Breda will be discussing. Sounds like a good one!
Squeaks did a guest-blogging gig over at Marko's. It's great to see Squeaks is still writing.
Nicki has some thought-provoking comments about 'the bailout bonanza.'
From Gateway Pundit:
*The case of the Palin email hacker attack has gone to the Grand Jury. David Kernell (son of Tennessee Democrat Mike Kernell, D-Memphis) and his 3 roommates will face the Grand Jury, with each facing a possible 2 years in prison for the felony.
*Barack Obama and terrorist William Ayers tried to push subversive radicalism on the schools.
*The Democrats blocked an oil deal between the U.S. and Iraq right in the middle of our oil crisis. And that's not all they blocked...
*Democrat billionaire operative George Soros says he is the one who got Sarah Palin uninvited to a rally against Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at the U.N.
The Times Online reports that Russia has sent a warship to the Caribbean.
Western Rifle Shooters Association says that there is a peasants with pitchforks revolt brewing against the trillion-dollar Wall Street bailout plan proposed by Democrats and Bush's czar, Henry Paulson.
Freedom Sight adds his protest to the bailout here.
Syd has a MUST-read on survival in light of his recent experience of living through some pretty awful conditions in the wake of the recent Hurricane to hit the Gulf coast.
The 'ole broad' of 'An Ol' Broad's Ramblings' is having knee surgery today. We can surely offer up our thoughts and prayers for her and for a speedy recovery.
Insight on Freedom offers insight on TWO potential 'October Surprises' just prior to the November election.
West, By God provides essential reading on children and gun safety.
From Codrea's War on Guns:
*David gives us an update on the latest shenanigans of the JBTs and their changing the definition of 'pistol.'
*Barack Obama opened his mouth and spouted gibberish in Jacksonville, Florida.
*Here is a guy who bursts a few bubbles.
Sebastian follows up on the reclassification issue concerning the term 'pistol' that David mentioned above.
JR posts 'Concealed Carry on College Campuses.'
Breda does an excellent job in exposing young minds to the 'reasonable-ness' of firearms.
Mike McCarville posts 'Obama Struggles to Win Clinton Voters.'
Ahab gives us a preview of tonight's radio show 'Gun Nuts--The Next Generation.' Go over there and see the very interesting topic that he and Breda will be discussing. Sounds like a good one!
Squeaks did a guest-blogging gig over at Marko's. It's great to see Squeaks is still writing.
Nicki has some thought-provoking comments about 'the bailout bonanza.'
From Gateway Pundit:
*The case of the Palin email hacker attack has gone to the Grand Jury. David Kernell (son of Tennessee Democrat Mike Kernell, D-Memphis) and his 3 roommates will face the Grand Jury, with each facing a possible 2 years in prison for the felony.
*Barack Obama and terrorist William Ayers tried to push subversive radicalism on the schools.
*The Democrats blocked an oil deal between the U.S. and Iraq right in the middle of our oil crisis. And that's not all they blocked...
*Democrat billionaire operative George Soros says he is the one who got Sarah Palin uninvited to a rally against Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at the U.N.
The Times Online reports that Russia has sent a warship to the Caribbean.
Western Rifle Shooters Association says that there is a peasants with pitchforks revolt brewing against the trillion-dollar Wall Street bailout plan proposed by Democrats and Bush's czar, Henry Paulson.
Freedom Sight adds his protest to the bailout here.
Syd has a MUST-read on survival in light of his recent experience of living through some pretty awful conditions in the wake of the recent Hurricane to hit the Gulf coast.
The 'ole broad' of 'An Ol' Broad's Ramblings' is having knee surgery today. We can surely offer up our thoughts and prayers for her and for a speedy recovery.
Insight on Freedom offers insight on TWO potential 'October Surprises' just prior to the November election.
West, By God provides essential reading on children and gun safety.
Thursday, September 27, 2007
The French Connection and Iran's Nukes
Underscoring the danger of nukes in the hands of Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, French President Nicolas Sarkozy told the United Nations on Tuesday that nuclear power in the hands of Iran would bring the world to the brink of war.
Sarkozy wasted no time in heading for the jugular in his assessment of the threat posed by nukes in the hands of a state sponsor of terror that has expressed the desire for Israel's demise.
In stark contrast to the policies and rhetoric employed by the French under the leadership of Jacques Chirac, the Sarkozy government appears to take much more of a realistic approach to the Middle East powder-keg.
Ahmadinejad's saber-rattling has become a staple of his Presidency, and Sarkozy takes it seriously. Nukes in the hands of the Iranians not only would be a threat to Israel but to much of Europe as well.
Apparently the U.S. is in full agreement with Sarkozy's assessment. Sources close to the Pentagon state that the U.S. has been secretly drawing up plans for targeted air strikes against Iranian facilities suspected of building the bombs.
These strikes would not be an all-out invasion, nor would any ground troops be necessary to accomplish the mission of destroying Iran's ability to develop nuclear power. In addition, such strikes would send Iran a signal that the U.S. intends to address Iran's threat to the surge in Iraq.
By destroying Iran's nuclear power-plants and key military-industrial facilities, along with cutting off the supply lines of insurgents flowing from Iran to Iraq, the U.S. would make it clear that it intends to cripple and dismantle one of its key roadblocks to success in the Iraqi campaign.
The present climate in French politics provides a golden opportunity for the Bush Administration to repair the strained relations between the two countries as a result of decades of an adversarial Jacques Chirac.
Not only can the U.S. repair its relations with the French and reclaim France as a key ally, but the two nations can conduct a joint operation to address the Iranian threat. A successful venture in this regard could bring a return to the U.S.-French connection on the world stage.
Sarkozy wasted no time in heading for the jugular in his assessment of the threat posed by nukes in the hands of a state sponsor of terror that has expressed the desire for Israel's demise.
In stark contrast to the policies and rhetoric employed by the French under the leadership of Jacques Chirac, the Sarkozy government appears to take much more of a realistic approach to the Middle East powder-keg.
Ahmadinejad's saber-rattling has become a staple of his Presidency, and Sarkozy takes it seriously. Nukes in the hands of the Iranians not only would be a threat to Israel but to much of Europe as well.
Apparently the U.S. is in full agreement with Sarkozy's assessment. Sources close to the Pentagon state that the U.S. has been secretly drawing up plans for targeted air strikes against Iranian facilities suspected of building the bombs.
These strikes would not be an all-out invasion, nor would any ground troops be necessary to accomplish the mission of destroying Iran's ability to develop nuclear power. In addition, such strikes would send Iran a signal that the U.S. intends to address Iran's threat to the surge in Iraq.
By destroying Iran's nuclear power-plants and key military-industrial facilities, along with cutting off the supply lines of insurgents flowing from Iran to Iraq, the U.S. would make it clear that it intends to cripple and dismantle one of its key roadblocks to success in the Iraqi campaign.
The present climate in French politics provides a golden opportunity for the Bush Administration to repair the strained relations between the two countries as a result of decades of an adversarial Jacques Chirac.
Not only can the U.S. repair its relations with the French and reclaim France as a key ally, but the two nations can conduct a joint operation to address the Iranian threat. A successful venture in this regard could bring a return to the U.S.-French connection on the world stage.
Wednesday, September 26, 2007
The Liberty Sphere Featured in 'Tulsa Today'
The Liberty Sphere's article on the visit of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Columbia University is featured in the current issue of 'Tulsa Today' as its lead op-ed for its Wednesday online publication.
Tulsa Today features news and commentary of interest to persons living in and around Tulsa, Oklahoma. A variety of articles are presented that would be of great interest to persons living outside the Tulsa area as well.
Take the time to give it a look. The link to The Liberty Sphere article is found here:
http://www.tulsatoday.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1338&Itemid=2
Tulsa Today features news and commentary of interest to persons living in and around Tulsa, Oklahoma. A variety of articles are presented that would be of great interest to persons living outside the Tulsa area as well.
Take the time to give it a look. The link to The Liberty Sphere article is found here:
http://www.tulsatoday.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1338&Itemid=2
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
Unintended Consequence at Columbia University
The appearance of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on the campus of Columbia University revealed a profound unintended consequence: the 'outing' of Ahmadinejad as the bumbling but dangerous buffoon he really is.
Some would say that the Iranian President's remarks at Columbia on Monday make him look so completely foolish that no one will take him seriously any longer. That would be a big mistake.
No greater danger is posed to the free world than a fool in control of a nation with nuclear power who believes Israel should be blown off the face of the map. If anything, Ahmadinejad revealed to the free world just how how deeply his ignorance influences his values.
Columbia University could not have foreseen these consequences of a terribly ill-informed decision to give one of the faces of modern evil a reputable platform from which to spout his unique form of hate and bigotry. This is the campus that spurns the ROTC and that has withdrawn speaking invitations from major conservative spokespersons.
Thus, Columbia's insistence that its invitation was all about 'free speech' is largely disingenuous. The University does not routinely afford free speech to noted conservative voices, particularly those on the front-lines of the global war on Islamists.
The University is also known for giving a platform to extremist Muslims from which they can deliver the most despicable and vile attacks against Jews and Israel, while refusing to grant to major Jewish voices the opportunity to speak about the dangers of the global Jihad.
And this is totally apart from the fact that it is entirely inappropriate for an American university to provide a megaphone to one of America's sworn enemies during a war.
To be fair, Columbia's President told the ugly truth about Ahmadinejad calmly and systematically in his remarks to introduce the Iranian leader. He is to be commended for his careful, deliberative manner of enumerating the many reasons Ahmadinejad is to be considered a scourge to the world.
But this does not in any way absolve Columbia of its shame and guilt for giving such an individual an opportunity to bask in even more of the world's attention.
As for Ahmadinejad's remarks, perhaps he succeeded in driving a nail into his own coffin by simply opening his mouth at Columbia. He refused to answer directly a question concerning his prior remarks that the Holocaust never happened, that Israel has no right to exist, and that he intends to build and use nuclear bombs to back up his rhetoric.
But perhaps the most telling feature of all was Ahmadinejad's claim that, 'We have no gays in Iran.'
Of course not. When you are the leader of a country that has outlawed homosexual behavior, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the Press, and freedom to assemble; where women are subjugated to the status of a dog--a mere possession of a man; and where liberty itself is considered evil and contrary to the laws of Allah; it is too easy to assume that when you look out the window over your fiefdom you see nothing but purity and harmony.
Vile and despicable human beings who dissent in public or decide to become Catholic, and shameful, godless women who speak their minds, are nowhere to be found.
Detractors, dissenters, and protesters have either been killed or imprisoned. The rest have either fled for their lives or gone underground. But in no way does this mean they do not exist.
Thus, perhaps in some odd way Columbia and Ahmadinejad did us all a favor. We were afforded a rare opportunity to see the backwardness, and the danger, of the mind of a Jihadist at work.
Some would say that the Iranian President's remarks at Columbia on Monday make him look so completely foolish that no one will take him seriously any longer. That would be a big mistake.
No greater danger is posed to the free world than a fool in control of a nation with nuclear power who believes Israel should be blown off the face of the map. If anything, Ahmadinejad revealed to the free world just how how deeply his ignorance influences his values.
Columbia University could not have foreseen these consequences of a terribly ill-informed decision to give one of the faces of modern evil a reputable platform from which to spout his unique form of hate and bigotry. This is the campus that spurns the ROTC and that has withdrawn speaking invitations from major conservative spokespersons.
Thus, Columbia's insistence that its invitation was all about 'free speech' is largely disingenuous. The University does not routinely afford free speech to noted conservative voices, particularly those on the front-lines of the global war on Islamists.
The University is also known for giving a platform to extremist Muslims from which they can deliver the most despicable and vile attacks against Jews and Israel, while refusing to grant to major Jewish voices the opportunity to speak about the dangers of the global Jihad.
And this is totally apart from the fact that it is entirely inappropriate for an American university to provide a megaphone to one of America's sworn enemies during a war.
To be fair, Columbia's President told the ugly truth about Ahmadinejad calmly and systematically in his remarks to introduce the Iranian leader. He is to be commended for his careful, deliberative manner of enumerating the many reasons Ahmadinejad is to be considered a scourge to the world.
But this does not in any way absolve Columbia of its shame and guilt for giving such an individual an opportunity to bask in even more of the world's attention.
As for Ahmadinejad's remarks, perhaps he succeeded in driving a nail into his own coffin by simply opening his mouth at Columbia. He refused to answer directly a question concerning his prior remarks that the Holocaust never happened, that Israel has no right to exist, and that he intends to build and use nuclear bombs to back up his rhetoric.
But perhaps the most telling feature of all was Ahmadinejad's claim that, 'We have no gays in Iran.'
Of course not. When you are the leader of a country that has outlawed homosexual behavior, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the Press, and freedom to assemble; where women are subjugated to the status of a dog--a mere possession of a man; and where liberty itself is considered evil and contrary to the laws of Allah; it is too easy to assume that when you look out the window over your fiefdom you see nothing but purity and harmony.
Vile and despicable human beings who dissent in public or decide to become Catholic, and shameful, godless women who speak their minds, are nowhere to be found.
Detractors, dissenters, and protesters have either been killed or imprisoned. The rest have either fled for their lives or gone underground. But in no way does this mean they do not exist.
Thus, perhaps in some odd way Columbia and Ahmadinejad did us all a favor. We were afforded a rare opportunity to see the backwardness, and the danger, of the mind of a Jihadist at work.
Monday, September 24, 2007
Second Amendment News Roundup for 9/24/07
Focusing on guns and politics, here is today's Second Amendment News Roundup:
Mr. Completely has the latest complete update on the Gun Bloggers Rendezvous, as of Friday:
http://mrcompletely.blogspot.com/2007/09/gbr-ii-news-update.html
Cap'n Bob reminds us of the importance of the cleaning process to maintain the effectiveness of a firearm:
http://capnbob.us/blog/2007/09/23/cleanliness-is-next-to-gunliness/
JR at A Keyboard and a .45 provides a timely reminder of the history and objectives of the Brady campaign and the gun control movement:
http://akeyboardanda45.blogspot.com/2007/09/just-little-reminder.html
The Volokh Conspiracy further elucidates the objectives of Brady and provides an assessment of the the next step in the Brady campaign's push to disarm American citizens:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_09_16-2007_09_22.shtml#1190402417
The Buckeye Firearms Association is reporting that today its Chairman, Jim Irvine, was interviewed by Fox News for a story it will present on its cable news network concerning Mayor Frank Jackson's new proposal for a statewide gun control law. The segment may begin airing on FNC as soon as today:
http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/index.php
Michelle Malkin has breaking news as to one of the key reasons Columbia University allowed Iranian dictator/madman/Holocaust denier Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to speak at the University:
http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/24/mahmoudapalooza-the-madman-comes-calling/
Malkin also reports that the vote on the 'Dream Act,' a backdoor, under-the-table amnesty deal for illegal aliens, has been put off until this week:
http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/21/shamnesty-watch/
Cameron Bailey points to the Obama proposal for a trillion dollar tax hike (no wonder Obama and Hillary the Hutt are like two birds of a feather):
http://www.cameron-bailey.com/2007/09/obama-tax-em-and-spend-like-crazy.html
Xavier Thoughts posts an interesting read on the early-20th-century Colt revolver:
http://xavierthoughts.blogspot.com/2007/09/pre-python-colt.html
Mike McCarville reports that U.S. Senator Jim Inhofe, R-Oklahoma, has added Internet campaigning to his run for re-election. Inhofe is known throughout the country as being an ardent supporter of the Second Amendment:
http://wwwtmrcom.blogspot.com/2007/09/inhofe-on-cutting-edge-again.html
Mike also has some great personal news concerning his grandson's return home from Iraq and the unique honor he bestowed upon Grandpa Mike:
http://wwwtmrcom.blogspot.com/2007/09/new-prized-possessions.html
The Jet Pilot alerts us to some neat-looking Second Amendment ribbons that are available for purchase online:
http://ajetpilot.blogspot.com/2007/09/second-amendment-ribbons.html
Alphecca provides some great advice today on how to write to Congress in such a way that gets results:
http://www.alphecca.com/?p=440
Armed and Safe weighs in today on a formerly unknown benefit from the gun 'buy-back' programs:
http://armedandsafe.blogspot.com/2007/09/now-thats-smile.html
Indulge me for a moment while I go off on a tangent about one of my favorite things. Most of you know that I love the pure high quality tobaccos that accompany pipe and cigar smoking. I can't help myself. It is not politically correct. But I still love it. And those who don't like it can kiss my ass. Ahem. But here is Blogonomicon's latest vintage pipe ad from 1932...enjoy:
http://blogonomicon.blogspot.com/2007/09/sunday-vintage-pipe-ad-1932-kaywoodie.html
Of Arms and the Law gives us an important update on the Supreme Court case, Watson vs. The United States:
http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2007/09/supreme_court_c_2.php
Oscar Poppa says it like I like it about San Francisco! Yeah, what he said!!:
http://oscarpoppa.us/?p=677
Oscar Poppa also has the cartoon editorial of the day, and it's a good one:
http://oscarpoppa.us/?p=676
Say Uncle asks the question, 'What if I'm wrong about Giuliani?' This is a good read:
http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/09/24/and_what_if_im_wrong_about_giuliani/
Say Uncle also says that the push for a ban on assault weapons has returned:
http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/09/24/assault_weapons_ban_push_returns/
Sharp as a Marble wants to know if anyone has some insight into air travel and carrying a handgun:
http://blog.robballen.com/archive/2007/09/24/Delta-and-my-personal-arsenal.aspx
Nicki at The Liberty Zone shows us what happens when one of the 'only ones' elitists hits a citizen whose vehicle was broken down in the expressway in Boston:
http://libertyzone.blogspot.com/2007/09/she-should-have-known-better-than-to.html
Traction Control points to the ridiculous comments of school administrators after a gunman walked into a school and chased a few around:
http://tractioncontrol.well-regulatedmilitia.org/?p=621
The Bitch Girls blog on the difficulty of getting adequate relief from allergies and sinus problems, due to our government's unreasonable vendetta against illegal drugs, even to the point of depriving law-abiding citizens of needed remedies:
http://www.thebitchgirls.us/?p=7412
Snow Flakes in Hell posts this assessment of the GOA's opposition to H.R. 2640. It would be great if Larry Pratt would agree to a dialogue over this, since obviously Sebastian believes that Larry has it wrong. Many of us oppose H.R. 2640 but not necessarily for the same reasons the GOA does:
http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=1575
Mr. Completely has the latest complete update on the Gun Bloggers Rendezvous, as of Friday:
http://mrcompletely.blogspot.com/2007/09/gbr-ii-news-update.html
Cap'n Bob reminds us of the importance of the cleaning process to maintain the effectiveness of a firearm:
http://capnbob.us/blog/2007/09/23/cleanliness-is-next-to-gunliness/
JR at A Keyboard and a .45 provides a timely reminder of the history and objectives of the Brady campaign and the gun control movement:
http://akeyboardanda45.blogspot.com/2007/09/just-little-reminder.html
The Volokh Conspiracy further elucidates the objectives of Brady and provides an assessment of the the next step in the Brady campaign's push to disarm American citizens:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_09_16-2007_09_22.shtml#1190402417
The Buckeye Firearms Association is reporting that today its Chairman, Jim Irvine, was interviewed by Fox News for a story it will present on its cable news network concerning Mayor Frank Jackson's new proposal for a statewide gun control law. The segment may begin airing on FNC as soon as today:
http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/index.php
Michelle Malkin has breaking news as to one of the key reasons Columbia University allowed Iranian dictator/madman/Holocaust denier Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to speak at the University:
http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/24/mahmoudapalooza-the-madman-comes-calling/
Malkin also reports that the vote on the 'Dream Act,' a backdoor, under-the-table amnesty deal for illegal aliens, has been put off until this week:
http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/21/shamnesty-watch/
Cameron Bailey points to the Obama proposal for a trillion dollar tax hike (no wonder Obama and Hillary the Hutt are like two birds of a feather):
http://www.cameron-bailey.com/2007/09/obama-tax-em-and-spend-like-crazy.html
Xavier Thoughts posts an interesting read on the early-20th-century Colt revolver:
http://xavierthoughts.blogspot.com/2007/09/pre-python-colt.html
Mike McCarville reports that U.S. Senator Jim Inhofe, R-Oklahoma, has added Internet campaigning to his run for re-election. Inhofe is known throughout the country as being an ardent supporter of the Second Amendment:
http://wwwtmrcom.blogspot.com/2007/09/inhofe-on-cutting-edge-again.html
Mike also has some great personal news concerning his grandson's return home from Iraq and the unique honor he bestowed upon Grandpa Mike:
http://wwwtmrcom.blogspot.com/2007/09/new-prized-possessions.html
The Jet Pilot alerts us to some neat-looking Second Amendment ribbons that are available for purchase online:
http://ajetpilot.blogspot.com/2007/09/second-amendment-ribbons.html
Alphecca provides some great advice today on how to write to Congress in such a way that gets results:
http://www.alphecca.com/?p=440
Armed and Safe weighs in today on a formerly unknown benefit from the gun 'buy-back' programs:
http://armedandsafe.blogspot.com/2007/09/now-thats-smile.html
Indulge me for a moment while I go off on a tangent about one of my favorite things. Most of you know that I love the pure high quality tobaccos that accompany pipe and cigar smoking. I can't help myself. It is not politically correct. But I still love it. And those who don't like it can kiss my ass. Ahem. But here is Blogonomicon's latest vintage pipe ad from 1932...enjoy:
http://blogonomicon.blogspot.com/2007/09/sunday-vintage-pipe-ad-1932-kaywoodie.html
Of Arms and the Law gives us an important update on the Supreme Court case, Watson vs. The United States:
http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2007/09/supreme_court_c_2.php
Oscar Poppa says it like I like it about San Francisco! Yeah, what he said!!:
http://oscarpoppa.us/?p=677
Oscar Poppa also has the cartoon editorial of the day, and it's a good one:
http://oscarpoppa.us/?p=676
Say Uncle asks the question, 'What if I'm wrong about Giuliani?' This is a good read:
http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/09/24/and_what_if_im_wrong_about_giuliani/
Say Uncle also says that the push for a ban on assault weapons has returned:
http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/09/24/assault_weapons_ban_push_returns/
Sharp as a Marble wants to know if anyone has some insight into air travel and carrying a handgun:
http://blog.robballen.com/archive/2007/09/24/Delta-and-my-personal-arsenal.aspx
Nicki at The Liberty Zone shows us what happens when one of the 'only ones' elitists hits a citizen whose vehicle was broken down in the expressway in Boston:
http://libertyzone.blogspot.com/2007/09/she-should-have-known-better-than-to.html
Traction Control points to the ridiculous comments of school administrators after a gunman walked into a school and chased a few around:
http://tractioncontrol.well-regulatedmilitia.org/?p=621
The Bitch Girls blog on the difficulty of getting adequate relief from allergies and sinus problems, due to our government's unreasonable vendetta against illegal drugs, even to the point of depriving law-abiding citizens of needed remedies:
http://www.thebitchgirls.us/?p=7412
Snow Flakes in Hell posts this assessment of the GOA's opposition to H.R. 2640. It would be great if Larry Pratt would agree to a dialogue over this, since obviously Sebastian believes that Larry has it wrong. Many of us oppose H.R. 2640 but not necessarily for the same reasons the GOA does:
http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=1575
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
COWARDS! Dems Ditch Fox Debates AGAIN
Washington, DC (TLS). For the 2nd time in two months, the candidates for the Democratic Presidential nomination have pulled out of debates sponsored by Fox News.
The first time, the candidates ditched a Fox-sponsored debate over something Roger Ailes said about Barack Obama. So, they picked up their rattles and pacifiers, and went home.
This time, Fox was planning a mammoth debate co-sponsored by the Congressional Black Caucus and the CBC in September.
But Barack Hussein Obama pulled out today, citing a policy of only participating in 'Democratic National Committee sanctioned debates.' Yet Obama stated that 'CNN would be a more appropriate venue.'
Sure, Senator. We understand. CNN will throw you soft-balls just as all the mainstream media news outlets have done. You wouldn't want to face the tough questions Fox may pose, would you? You know....like Republicans have had to do for decades at the hands of a hostile mainstream media that clearly preferred Liberal candidates?
B. Hussein Obama is not the only coward in the mix, however.
Hillary Clinton also bailed today, citing the same supposed 'policy' of appearing only at 'DNC-sanctioned debates.'
What the heck is that, anyway? 'A DNC-sanctioned debate.' Hmmm.
Let me guess. A DNC-sanctioned debate will mean Fox News will not be allowed to have any part of it. A DNC-sanctioned debate will probably involve Katie Couric, Matt Lauer, Wolf Blitzer, or Helen Thomas. No questions will be allowed on Hillary's graduate thesis at Wellesley, showing her metamorphosis from a Goldwater Republican to an extremist Leftist collectivist who prefers European styled Socialism to American free enterprise.
In addition, no questions would be raised concerning Obama's connections to extremists in Islam (even his own pastor questioned his ties to Islam when Obama joined the United Church of Christ--another ultra-Leftwing outfit that takes every opportunity possible to bash America). And of course, a DNC-sanctioned event would involve absolutely no questions about the fact that Obama has the most Liberal voting record in the Senate--even more so than Ted 'Senator Blowhard' Kennedy.
Hillary would also be given a pass on her enormous dark cloud of corruption that follows her and her husband wherever they go.
My friends, what if Newt Gingrich were to say, 'I will not appear at any debate except that which is sanctioned by the Republican National Committee?'
Or what if Rudy Giuliani were to say, 'I will appear only at debates sponsored by Fox News?'
What do you think would be the response of the mainstream media to such statements on the part of Republicans?
I can tell you it would dominate the news for months. Charles Gibson and his colleagues at the other networks would see to that.
Yet this is the 2nd time--read that again, the SECOND TIME--the Democrat cowards have refused to appear at a debate involving Fox News.
If the mainstream media allows these clowns to get away with this without sounding the clarion alarm about how candidates are ducking the hard questions, then there will be even more ample proof that they are in the hip-pocket of the DNC and the Democratic candidates.
Of course, we knew that anyway. We already know for a fact that George Soros paid them off and met with them regularly during the 2006 election cycle to talk with them about pushing stories that made Bush look bad and squelching stories that made him look good.
It is obvious that the cowardly lame-brains that make up the field of Democratic candidates this year want nothing but soft-peddled questions. They want to dictate what will and will not be asked. They want to avoid pointed questions that shine the spotlight on their glaring faults, contradictions, and extremist ideology.
In short, they are yellow-bellied cowards that don't even have the guts to face Fox News! So, tell me, how in the HELL will they muster up the courage to face Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or Kim Jong Il?
The first time, the candidates ditched a Fox-sponsored debate over something Roger Ailes said about Barack Obama. So, they picked up their rattles and pacifiers, and went home.
This time, Fox was planning a mammoth debate co-sponsored by the Congressional Black Caucus and the CBC in September.
But Barack Hussein Obama pulled out today, citing a policy of only participating in 'Democratic National Committee sanctioned debates.' Yet Obama stated that 'CNN would be a more appropriate venue.'
Sure, Senator. We understand. CNN will throw you soft-balls just as all the mainstream media news outlets have done. You wouldn't want to face the tough questions Fox may pose, would you? You know....like Republicans have had to do for decades at the hands of a hostile mainstream media that clearly preferred Liberal candidates?
B. Hussein Obama is not the only coward in the mix, however.
Hillary Clinton also bailed today, citing the same supposed 'policy' of appearing only at 'DNC-sanctioned debates.'
What the heck is that, anyway? 'A DNC-sanctioned debate.' Hmmm.
Let me guess. A DNC-sanctioned debate will mean Fox News will not be allowed to have any part of it. A DNC-sanctioned debate will probably involve Katie Couric, Matt Lauer, Wolf Blitzer, or Helen Thomas. No questions will be allowed on Hillary's graduate thesis at Wellesley, showing her metamorphosis from a Goldwater Republican to an extremist Leftist collectivist who prefers European styled Socialism to American free enterprise.
In addition, no questions would be raised concerning Obama's connections to extremists in Islam (even his own pastor questioned his ties to Islam when Obama joined the United Church of Christ--another ultra-Leftwing outfit that takes every opportunity possible to bash America). And of course, a DNC-sanctioned event would involve absolutely no questions about the fact that Obama has the most Liberal voting record in the Senate--even more so than Ted 'Senator Blowhard' Kennedy.
Hillary would also be given a pass on her enormous dark cloud of corruption that follows her and her husband wherever they go.
My friends, what if Newt Gingrich were to say, 'I will not appear at any debate except that which is sanctioned by the Republican National Committee?'
Or what if Rudy Giuliani were to say, 'I will appear only at debates sponsored by Fox News?'
What do you think would be the response of the mainstream media to such statements on the part of Republicans?
I can tell you it would dominate the news for months. Charles Gibson and his colleagues at the other networks would see to that.
Yet this is the 2nd time--read that again, the SECOND TIME--the Democrat cowards have refused to appear at a debate involving Fox News.
If the mainstream media allows these clowns to get away with this without sounding the clarion alarm about how candidates are ducking the hard questions, then there will be even more ample proof that they are in the hip-pocket of the DNC and the Democratic candidates.
Of course, we knew that anyway. We already know for a fact that George Soros paid them off and met with them regularly during the 2006 election cycle to talk with them about pushing stories that made Bush look bad and squelching stories that made him look good.
It is obvious that the cowardly lame-brains that make up the field of Democratic candidates this year want nothing but soft-peddled questions. They want to dictate what will and will not be asked. They want to avoid pointed questions that shine the spotlight on their glaring faults, contradictions, and extremist ideology.
In short, they are yellow-bellied cowards that don't even have the guts to face Fox News! So, tell me, how in the HELL will they muster up the courage to face Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or Kim Jong Il?
Thursday, April 05, 2007
The Terrorists Win Again
Washington, DC (TLS). As the world breaths a sigh of relief that the 15 British hostages are being released by the Iranian government, there is without question a much darker side to this entire scenario. The terrorists have won again. The Iranian government accomplished its purpose by utterly humiliating Great Britain by taking their soldiers hostage, parading them on TV, the female in Muslim head-gear and the men apologizing for supposedly entering Iranian waters, while singing the praises of their captors.
And then Iranian President/terrorist/madman/Holocaust Denier Mahmoud Ahmadinejad comes forth to 'save the day,' claiming he has given Britain an 'Easter gift,' and coming across looking like a benevolent statesmen in the Muslim propaganda machine.
But make no mistake about it, this was a calculated scheme from the very start.
Iran is under great pressure from Europe, the United States, and the United Nations concerning its rogue status and its program of building nuclear weapons. It needed a public relations boost, and unfortunately, it got one handed to them by Great Britain.
The terrorists win by appearing benevolent and open to diplomacy and negotiation, Leftists win by being enabled to claim that talking to Iran rather than waging war against them is the thing that gets positive results, and the world is once again duped into believing that such displays by a dangerous nation that has vowed to annihilate Israel and the West is some indication that they are really not that bad after all.
Prime Minister Chamberlain of Great Britain thought the same thing when he signed a treaty with a very benevolent Adolf Hitler prior to WWII.
While Britain cheered Chamberlain as a hero for keeping them from war, a lone voice, that of Winston Churchill, warned Parliament that they had been duped, that Chamberlain had just been made the fool, and that Hitler would only continue his deadly march through Europe.
In just a few short days following the supposed triumph of Chamberlain, Hitler proceeded to break the treaty. He then invaded Poland, dragging Great Britain into the middle of war with Germany because of its treaty obligations to Poland.
While it is always good news that hostages are released unharmed, the world must not lose its focus or its bearings. Iran is still one of the most dangerous nations on earth. They are clearly not benevolent. Neither is Ahmadinejad. They are murderers. They sponsor terrorism. The fact that they allowed 15 British hostages to go free in order to play to the court of public opinion in no way minimizes or negates the fact that they wish to kill innocent people because they do not embrace Islam.
Ahmadinejad hopes that his little charade will buy him some more time as Iran continues to develop nuclear weapons and as it continues to funnel terrorists into Iraq and work for the destruction of Israel.
Informed people know that the entire display is a ruse. And it is our task to keep this fact flowing along the information highway for the less informed. Iran is still a dangerous enemy that must be stopped.
And then Iranian President/terrorist/madman/Holocaust Denier Mahmoud Ahmadinejad comes forth to 'save the day,' claiming he has given Britain an 'Easter gift,' and coming across looking like a benevolent statesmen in the Muslim propaganda machine.
But make no mistake about it, this was a calculated scheme from the very start.
Iran is under great pressure from Europe, the United States, and the United Nations concerning its rogue status and its program of building nuclear weapons. It needed a public relations boost, and unfortunately, it got one handed to them by Great Britain.
The terrorists win by appearing benevolent and open to diplomacy and negotiation, Leftists win by being enabled to claim that talking to Iran rather than waging war against them is the thing that gets positive results, and the world is once again duped into believing that such displays by a dangerous nation that has vowed to annihilate Israel and the West is some indication that they are really not that bad after all.
Prime Minister Chamberlain of Great Britain thought the same thing when he signed a treaty with a very benevolent Adolf Hitler prior to WWII.
While Britain cheered Chamberlain as a hero for keeping them from war, a lone voice, that of Winston Churchill, warned Parliament that they had been duped, that Chamberlain had just been made the fool, and that Hitler would only continue his deadly march through Europe.
In just a few short days following the supposed triumph of Chamberlain, Hitler proceeded to break the treaty. He then invaded Poland, dragging Great Britain into the middle of war with Germany because of its treaty obligations to Poland.
While it is always good news that hostages are released unharmed, the world must not lose its focus or its bearings. Iran is still one of the most dangerous nations on earth. They are clearly not benevolent. Neither is Ahmadinejad. They are murderers. They sponsor terrorism. The fact that they allowed 15 British hostages to go free in order to play to the court of public opinion in no way minimizes or negates the fact that they wish to kill innocent people because they do not embrace Islam.
Ahmadinejad hopes that his little charade will buy him some more time as Iran continues to develop nuclear weapons and as it continues to funnel terrorists into Iraq and work for the destruction of Israel.
Informed people know that the entire display is a ruse. And it is our task to keep this fact flowing along the information highway for the less informed. Iran is still a dangerous enemy that must be stopped.
Sunday, March 25, 2007
IRAN CHARGES BRITONS WITH ESPIONAGE
Washington, DC (TLS). Iran announced on Saturday that it intends to place the British soldiers it kidnapped on trial for espionage. The announcement came on the same day that the U.N. Security Council passed a resolution approving new sanctions against the rogue, extremist Muslim nation.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was scheduled to speak before the U.N. chamber on Saturday prior to the Security Council's vote but cancelled the trip in the aftermath of his nation's kidnapping of British soldiers and the subsequent build-up of U.S. and British forces in the Persian Gulf.
American and British forces in the Gulf remain on high alert as tensions between Iran and the West continue to rise. Great Britain has demanded the full, unconditional release of its servicemen, who were captured off the coast of Kuwait. Kuwaiti observers insist the soldiers were in Iraqi waters. Iran insists they were in Iranian waters.
Somehow, mysteriously, Iran claims it has a 'confession' from the kidnapped men claiming that they were in Iranian waters. Observers in the area dispute that claim, which suggests that Iran has placed inappropriate pressure on the soldiers.
The news today that Iran plans to place British servicemen on trial for 'espionage' is a serious development in this showdown, one which points to the stark reality that we are nearing a major crisis in the Gulf.
The West cannot allow a terrorist nation to place on trial any of our servicemen for crimes as serious as the one with which they are charged. Given the present circumstances within the Gulf, the British soldiers had every reason to be where they were as we attempt to secure Iraq and insulate it from terrorist insurgents from Iran.
We must remember that in extremist Muslim states, the death penalty is not reserved for just murder but is commonly used for a variety of crimes, including doing nothing more than speaking negatively about Islam. Espionage would be considered a most serious offense, and thus, these fundamentalists will not hesitate to apply the death penalty to the kidnapped soldiers when they are found guilty, and we can rest assured that they WILL be found guilty.
Thus, the West cannot wait and deliver a measured response. The response must be swift, sure, resolute, and devastating. We can begin by delivering an ultimatum to Ahmadinejad--either release the kidnapped British soldiers or face the wrath of the massive arsenal of various types of modern weaponry that the U.S. and Great Britain have at their disposal.
If that means threatening Ahmadinejad with nuclear annihilation, then so be it. The West MUST show Iran NOW that we will not tolerate any more of their saber-rattling threats or their despicable acts of terror.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was scheduled to speak before the U.N. chamber on Saturday prior to the Security Council's vote but cancelled the trip in the aftermath of his nation's kidnapping of British soldiers and the subsequent build-up of U.S. and British forces in the Persian Gulf.
American and British forces in the Gulf remain on high alert as tensions between Iran and the West continue to rise. Great Britain has demanded the full, unconditional release of its servicemen, who were captured off the coast of Kuwait. Kuwaiti observers insist the soldiers were in Iraqi waters. Iran insists they were in Iranian waters.
Somehow, mysteriously, Iran claims it has a 'confession' from the kidnapped men claiming that they were in Iranian waters. Observers in the area dispute that claim, which suggests that Iran has placed inappropriate pressure on the soldiers.
The news today that Iran plans to place British servicemen on trial for 'espionage' is a serious development in this showdown, one which points to the stark reality that we are nearing a major crisis in the Gulf.
The West cannot allow a terrorist nation to place on trial any of our servicemen for crimes as serious as the one with which they are charged. Given the present circumstances within the Gulf, the British soldiers had every reason to be where they were as we attempt to secure Iraq and insulate it from terrorist insurgents from Iran.
We must remember that in extremist Muslim states, the death penalty is not reserved for just murder but is commonly used for a variety of crimes, including doing nothing more than speaking negatively about Islam. Espionage would be considered a most serious offense, and thus, these fundamentalists will not hesitate to apply the death penalty to the kidnapped soldiers when they are found guilty, and we can rest assured that they WILL be found guilty.
Thus, the West cannot wait and deliver a measured response. The response must be swift, sure, resolute, and devastating. We can begin by delivering an ultimatum to Ahmadinejad--either release the kidnapped British soldiers or face the wrath of the massive arsenal of various types of modern weaponry that the U.S. and Great Britain have at their disposal.
If that means threatening Ahmadinejad with nuclear annihilation, then so be it. The West MUST show Iran NOW that we will not tolerate any more of their saber-rattling threats or their despicable acts of terror.
Friday, March 23, 2007
LIBERTY ALERT! SHOWDOWN IN THE GULF
Washington, DC (TLS). Tensions are high in the Persian Gulf this evening as U.S. and British forces reinforce their presence in the region in light of the kidnapping of British soldiers by the Iranian military. The British soldiers were taken in Iraqi waters just off the coast of Kuwait.
The situation has grown so tense that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad cancelled a much-publicized trip to New York to speak before the U.N. General Assembly on Saturday prior to a vote on a resolution further condemning Iran's nuclear program.
Observers are puzzled, however, that at such a critical moment in Iran's attempt to avoid further recriminations from the United Nations it would perpetrate such a blatant act of hostility.
The bottom line is that Iran is a rogue state seeking to develop nuclear bombs. Its President has made it clear he would not hesitate to use those bombs against Israel, Europe, and the United States. He has also made it perfectly clear that he wishes to annihilate the nation of Israel entirely, wiping it from the map.
Unless the British navy-men are released unharmed, then the U.S. and Britain must take immediate military action to stop the spreading scourge of radical, Iranian Islam. This can only be accomplished by military strikes from the air and sea, aimed at nuclear facilities and Iran's houses of government in Teheran.
The situation has grown so tense that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad cancelled a much-publicized trip to New York to speak before the U.N. General Assembly on Saturday prior to a vote on a resolution further condemning Iran's nuclear program.
Observers are puzzled, however, that at such a critical moment in Iran's attempt to avoid further recriminations from the United Nations it would perpetrate such a blatant act of hostility.
The bottom line is that Iran is a rogue state seeking to develop nuclear bombs. Its President has made it clear he would not hesitate to use those bombs against Israel, Europe, and the United States. He has also made it perfectly clear that he wishes to annihilate the nation of Israel entirely, wiping it from the map.
Unless the British navy-men are released unharmed, then the U.S. and Britain must take immediate military action to stop the spreading scourge of radical, Iranian Islam. This can only be accomplished by military strikes from the air and sea, aimed at nuclear facilities and Iran's houses of government in Teheran.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)