More on Controversial Civilian National Service Bill

The comments keep rolling in on the new law creating a massive civilian national service corp. And the controversy continues, as well.

My new article at Columbia Conservative Examiner has it all.

This is a follow-up to yesterday's article.

Thanks for clicking on the link and reading. All comments are welcome.

ACTION ALERT ON NEW NATIONAL SERVICE BILL

The newly-approved bill creating a national service corp does not yet contain that 'mandatory' provision as it was originally envisioned, but that could quickly change.

There are also other major changes afoot in Congress concerning this disturbing bill that you should know.

This alert was just sent out by the editors at Net Right Nation:

Fellow Bloggers,

This week, the Democrats in the Senate and House introduced a devastating new bill – the so-called Generations Invigorating Volunteers and Education Act (S.277) – that would allow politicians to funnel billions of tax dollars to leftwing organizations that they could then use for political purposes. As a blogger, you are the front line for exposing what legislation does.

It's being done under the guise of enabling Barack Obama to build his $5 billion, 250,000-member “volunteer” youth corps – “just as powerful, just as strong” as the U.S. military, as he promised during his campaign. You may remember that chilling speech in Colorado Springs:

"We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

If the so-called GIVE Act is passed in its present form, groups like ACORN and Jessie Jackson's PUSH will receive multi-million-dollar grants for lobbying, community organizing, protests, strikes – and just about any other activity they believe would further their hard left agenda. And that would mean your tax dollars would be used to pass legislation and elect politicians you absolutely oppose!

Fortunately, Sen. Jim DeMint has introduced a vital amendment to GIVE that would prohibit “advocacy” groups or groups co-located with advocacy groups from receiving any assistance under the Act. The DeMint Amendment would automatically prohibit any organization “engaged in legislative advocacy” – or working hand in hand with such organizations -- from receiving assistance under the GIVE Act. And that, of course, is exactly how it should be.

Leftwing groups and blogs are flooding the Senate with angry demands that the DeMint Amendment be defeated. They know it could cost them hundreds of millions of your tax dollars – and prevent them from using your money to disrupt our entire political system.

That's why I am asking you to join me in matching them call for call. We must fight them on the blogosphere as well. You have the power to expose this bill for what it is—a shame! Time is of the essence. The DeMint Amendment prohibiting advocacy organizations from receiving assistance under the GIVE Act could come up for a vote at any moment. We still have time to keep this language in the bill. But, we must act now!

Please contact your Senators immediately and let them know how the DeMint Amendment's prohibition on nonprofit advocacy will help saves billions of tax dollars and prevent leftwing organizations from corrupting our political system. Tell them to vote to keep the DeMint Amendment in the bill -- and keep your tax dollars from going to groups whose policies and politics you oppose.

I hope many of you will spring into action on this as soon as possible.

LIBERTY ALERT! National Service Becomes Law

Rubber-stamping a House bill approved earlier, the U.S. Senate approved an Obama-initiated measure creating a mandatory 'national service corp.'

Obama was expected to quickly sign the measure into law.

And thus begins our historic first experiment as a nation with a Nazi-like 'youth service league,' which Hitler began prior to WWII to train footsoldiers for the march toward 'national socialism,' which was known at the time as fascism.

Here is the news report concerning the bill.

LIBERTY ALERT! Secrets of BO's Civilian Force

The U.S. House of Representatives gave its approval for Barack Obama to form a new civilian national security force in a piece of legislation called 'GIVE.'

This act is replete with many references to 'mandatory volunteer service,' nevermind the Orwellian newspeak.

Secrets contained in this piece of legislation should be enough to make any thinking American cringe. This is NOT merely an innocuous attempt at some sort of honorable national service opportunity for patriotic Americans. It is a blatant attempt by Obama to form a youth movement reminiscent of Hitler's organization prior to WWII.

For the complete inside scoop on this, please read THIS.

House Approves Mandatory National Service Bill

While the country's attention is diverted to economic matters, the Obama administration and the Democrats conduct ominous business under the radar screen.

Those who have warned about Obama's intention to institute a mandatory national service corp for youth were 100% correct. The bill has been introduced and approved by the House. Now it goes to the Senate.

Obama, no doubt, will sign it.

This bodes ill for the country. Many fear that this is the first step of a Chief Executive to put in place a Nazi-like youth national service corp that will serve as a way to train and brainwash young minds to not only support but advance a subversive agenda for the nation.

Read the entire story here.

When Extremists Run the Government

They have decided that Americans are too dumb and helpless to manage their own financial affairs, so they are discussing seizing the private retirement accounts of citizens and placing them under the control of the federal government.

They have decided that American capitalism, which has produced the most prosperous nation in the history of mankind, is to blame for the failure of corrupt individuals in government and business to competently and honorably manage the nation's banking, housing, and mortgage industry, and thus, certain businesses must be partially owned by the government (the definition of fascism).

They have decided that the citizens must be coerced and forced into 'cooperation' with the new 'rulers,' and thus they will organize a massive citizen army that will report directly to Barack Obama. This civilian security force will have power and funding equal to that of the U.S. military.

They have decided that conservative talk radio has been so successful as the only counter-balance to a decidedly biased and liberal mainstream media that it must be silenced under the guise of a censorship mechanism called 'the Fairness Doctrine.'

They are going to close Gitmo and bring roughly 200 extremely dangerous, hardcore terrorists to the American mainland to stand trial. These are the people who guide airplanes into buildings and behead 'infidels.' Do you want a head-chopper housed somewhere near you?

They believe that the U.S. Constitution is 'flawed' because it does not mandate stealing from the affluent in order to give to others. Redistribution of wealth, a common plank in the Socialist/Communist form of government, is their ideal.

And then, to top it all off, terrorist William Ayers, friend and partner to Barack Obama, appeared on ABC's 'Good Morning America' and admitted what Obama denied, which is that he and the incoming President are 'close family friends.'

The question is, had Americans been informed about this prior to the election in the mainstream newspapers and TV outlets, would the election have turned out very differently? Why are we only now hearing about this in the mainstream media outlets?

To be sure, Ayers is no longer planting bombs as he did in the 1960s and 70s, but his radicalism is still the same, and he is not sorry that he engaged in violence to promote his radicalism. These are HIS words, not mine.

Obama and Ayers collaborated on a number of projects through the years. Obama wrote a foreword for one of Ayers' books, and Ayers admitted on Good Morning America that he had, indeed, been involved in Obama's early political career. All of this, of course, was denied by Obama on camera in a debate with John McCain.

As if this were not enough, it has been disclosed by unnamed sources that Obama secretly met with Hamas when he made his trip to the Middle East and Europe during the campaign. When the details of this meeting become known, and when Americans discover what was discussed during that meeting, if everything you've read thus far hasn't convinced you that the country has made a big mistake, then this will seal the deal.

Obama went out of his way to attempt to convince Jews he was pro-Israel. But if he met with a terrorist organization that believes Israel has no right to exist, what will Jewish citizens think then? What will any American think when they discover that in all likelihood he made a deal to give away half of Jerusalem to terrorists?

And let's not forget that millions of dollars in campaign contributions to Obama have been traced back to Hamas. Not only is this illegal, but the fact that Obama would meet secretly with the group while in the area suggests just how much the 'President-elect' owes those terrorists.

The handwriting is on the wall. Obama was bound to know that the truth about his ideology, his methodology, his plans for implementing a statist model in America, and his ominous associations with subversives, would be exposed early on in his administration.

The problem is, he has been exposed even before he takes office.

And, with Obama's well-known opposition to any American owning and carrying a firearm, confirmed by his requirement that anyone seeking to serve in his administration must not be a gun owner, perhaps his time-frame for confiscation will coincide with the ugly truth--all of the truth--finally being made public.

This is no time to let down our guard. This is a time to be watchful and super-vigilant.

The subversives may count on our ignorance, but we don't have to prove the point.

ALERT! Obama's Hit-Man Talks New Security Force

An audio has surfaced which has Obama's new Chief of Staff/hit-man Rahm Emanuel discussing the plan to implement a new national civilian security force that will answer directly to Barack Obama.

The Chairman never provided specific details of the plan on the campaign trail, and the mainstream media never bothered to ask him about it.

But Obama did state that the new security force would be equal to the U.S. military in power and funding.

Rahm Emanuel, you will remember, is the Chicago politician who is famous for slamming his ideological opponents with a vengeance. He once even sent a dead fish to a pollster who made him angry over poll numbers.

It is very clear from the audio that Rahm is talking about much more than citizens providing innocuous 'civil service' in government offices. This is mandatory, and it involves military-like training.

Watch/listen to the audio/video and read the commentary provided here, at Gateway Pundit.

U.S. Congressman Warns of Obama Dictatorship

Citing Barack Obama's stated intention of starting a 'Civilian National Security Force' that answers directly to him, a United States Congressman has warned that the proposal has all of the markings of a Marxist dictatorship.

As we have warned for months, the Obama proposal to create this security force that would have equal funding and status to that of the U.S. Military is a concept born in and implemented by Marxist-Socialist dictatorships throughout the world.

Such a security force was implement by Adolf Hitler in Germany and by Joseph Stalin in the old Soviet Union.

Most if not all of Obama's proposals are a direct assault on freedoms enjoyed by U.S. citizens. In fact, which of the Obama proposals are NOT a threat to liberty?

Obama's Commie-Style Civilian Security Force

Barack Obama has stated repeatedly, though you would never hear it in the mainstream media, that he intends to begin a so-called 'Civilian Security Force' that would 'be just as powerful and just as well-funded as the military.'

Here is the video from part of an Obama speech on the subject.

Free societies based upon democratic principles have never had such civilian armies. The only regimes in the world that have implemented such measures are totalitarian ones, such as Cuba under Castro and Germany under Hitler, just to name two.

It is difficult to understand what, exactly, Obama would have this massive civilian police-state do unless it is to make sure his policies are implemented with minimal opposition from citizens.

When we look to other police states around the world, we gain some clues.

One can imagine neighbor spying on neighbor to make sure all of the peons in the citizenry 'cooperate' with the new Obama order. One can imagine gun confiscation.

In order to justify the huge expenditures that beginning such a mammoth program will entail, Obama would need a list of specific goals and objectives for this civilian police-state army.

Rest assured that with a civilian army the size Obama envisions, we can expect an avalanche of government intrusion into our daily lives. Big Brother will be watching every move. Citizen will be pitted against citizen. Former friends will become enemies...that is, unless we all get on board the Obama train to hell.