Google Custom Search

Saturday, November 15, 2008

When Extremists Run the Government

They have decided that Americans are too dumb and helpless to manage their own financial affairs, so they are discussing seizing the private retirement accounts of citizens and placing them under the control of the federal government.

They have decided that American capitalism, which has produced the most prosperous nation in the history of mankind, is to blame for the failure of corrupt individuals in government and business to competently and honorably manage the nation's banking, housing, and mortgage industry, and thus, certain businesses must be partially owned by the government (the definition of fascism).

They have decided that the citizens must be coerced and forced into 'cooperation' with the new 'rulers,' and thus they will organize a massive citizen army that will report directly to Barack Obama. This civilian security force will have power and funding equal to that of the U.S. military.

They have decided that conservative talk radio has been so successful as the only counter-balance to a decidedly biased and liberal mainstream media that it must be silenced under the guise of a censorship mechanism called 'the Fairness Doctrine.'

They are going to close Gitmo and bring roughly 200 extremely dangerous, hardcore terrorists to the American mainland to stand trial. These are the people who guide airplanes into buildings and behead 'infidels.' Do you want a head-chopper housed somewhere near you?

They believe that the U.S. Constitution is 'flawed' because it does not mandate stealing from the affluent in order to give to others. Redistribution of wealth, a common plank in the Socialist/Communist form of government, is their ideal.

And then, to top it all off, terrorist William Ayers, friend and partner to Barack Obama, appeared on ABC's 'Good Morning America' and admitted what Obama denied, which is that he and the incoming President are 'close family friends.'

The question is, had Americans been informed about this prior to the election in the mainstream newspapers and TV outlets, would the election have turned out very differently? Why are we only now hearing about this in the mainstream media outlets?

To be sure, Ayers is no longer planting bombs as he did in the 1960s and 70s, but his radicalism is still the same, and he is not sorry that he engaged in violence to promote his radicalism. These are HIS words, not mine.

Obama and Ayers collaborated on a number of projects through the years. Obama wrote a foreword for one of Ayers' books, and Ayers admitted on Good Morning America that he had, indeed, been involved in Obama's early political career. All of this, of course, was denied by Obama on camera in a debate with John McCain.

As if this were not enough, it has been disclosed by unnamed sources that Obama secretly met with Hamas when he made his trip to the Middle East and Europe during the campaign. When the details of this meeting become known, and when Americans discover what was discussed during that meeting, if everything you've read thus far hasn't convinced you that the country has made a big mistake, then this will seal the deal.

Obama went out of his way to attempt to convince Jews he was pro-Israel. But if he met with a terrorist organization that believes Israel has no right to exist, what will Jewish citizens think then? What will any American think when they discover that in all likelihood he made a deal to give away half of Jerusalem to terrorists?

And let's not forget that millions of dollars in campaign contributions to Obama have been traced back to Hamas. Not only is this illegal, but the fact that Obama would meet secretly with the group while in the area suggests just how much the 'President-elect' owes those terrorists.

The handwriting is on the wall. Obama was bound to know that the truth about his ideology, his methodology, his plans for implementing a statist model in America, and his ominous associations with subversives, would be exposed early on in his administration.

The problem is, he has been exposed even before he takes office.

And, with Obama's well-known opposition to any American owning and carrying a firearm, confirmed by his requirement that anyone seeking to serve in his administration must not be a gun owner, perhaps his time-frame for confiscation will coincide with the ugly truth--all of the truth--finally being made public.

This is no time to let down our guard. This is a time to be watchful and super-vigilant.

The subversives may count on our ignorance, but we don't have to prove the point.

2 comments:

UNREFORMED said...

I agree completely with your outlook but I fear that the common man or woman is more concerned with whether or not Brangelina is getting married and how Brittany or Hannah Montana are doing.

Now that the sheeple have been heard and chose the man with the most charisma and brand name marketing tactics. They go back to there lives where politics means nothing unless it is on the daily show or GMA. Keep up the fight and if we stir up enough problems maybe the mainstream media will get around to vetting Barack Obama before the next election.

check out my blog at libertyandfreedom@blogspot.com

Welshman said...

The under-30 generation, which voted overwhelmingly for Obama, is going to get a shocking wake-up call when Obama taps them for mandatory government service in his 'national civilian security force.'

That will be enough to take them away from Hannah and Britney for a few years.