Ignoring the clear rule of law under the U.S. Code, a federal judge ruled on Thursday that the the new illegal alien laws in the city of Hazleton, Pennsylvania are unconstitutional. The Judge maintains that the new laws violate due process.
Hazleton had enacted the new regulations to address a growing problem in the city. Illegal aliens came flooding into town in droves and now compose 10% of the population. With the massive increase of illegals, there was a simultaneous increase in crime.
The city overwhelmingly supported laws that prevent businesses from hiring illegal aliens and landlords from renting them housing.
Today's ruling by an activist judge flies in the face of the U.S. Code, which states that the aiding and abetting of illegal aliens is a felony.
How is giving an illegal a job and renting them housing NOT aiding and abetting their committing a crime?
On a related note, a Sheriff in an Arizona county has implemented strict measures in enforcing the laws against illegal aliens. He even set up a hotline so that citizens could report to law enforcement their suspicions about undocumented workers.
Yet on Thursday he was urged to discontinue the hotline by certain persons within government and by certain religious groups who seem to take a rather dim view of their country's security and its laws.
My friends, this is not about playing politics, although it is most assuredly a political issue. Democrats and Republicans both have a vested interest in NOT following this nation's laws on immigration. Democrats buy the loyalty of illegals by catering to their criminal activity in breaking the law entering the country illegally. Republicans buy the loyalty of certain business interests by catering to their criminal activity as well--that of knowingly and willfully committing felonies in order to save a few bucks on cheap labor.
Thus, both Parties have their hands stuck down into this cookie jar. They both have been caught red-handed. Still, nothing is being done about it.
The question is, does the rule of law mean anything at all anymore in the United States of America?
Showing posts with label felony. Show all posts
Showing posts with label felony. Show all posts
Friday, July 27, 2007
Monday, May 21, 2007
Illegal Aliens Commit 90% of Murders in L.A.
Los Angeles, CA (TLS). Here's an eye-opener for you. Statistics from the Los Angeles Police Department and the California Department of Justice show that illegal aliens commit over 90% of the murders in Los Angeles.
This is simply another example of the consequences of a reckless national policy on immigration--a policy that does not even pretend to enforce the laws that are already on the books.
Statements have been made by some in the debate over immigration that perhaps the driving force of the opposition to open borders and amnesty programs is that 'we don't want those kinds of people in the republic.'
You bet your sweet bottle of Corona I don't!
Why would I want to open up the country to gangs of thugs who plunder, pillage, pilfer, and perpetrate mayhem? Those who come here to work, learn English, become accustomed to our culture, and support our government and way of life are welcome. Those who come here for the freebies and to fly the Mexican flag are NOT welcome. It is simple as that.
In a city as large as Los Angeles and its near-uncontrollable crime problem, for over 90% of the murders to be committed by illegal aliens is nothing less than horrifying.
The nation's immigration problem is totally out of control, and the bill put forth by Ted 'Senator Blowhard' Kennedy and John McCain, and supported by George W. Bush, will NOT reign it in. We need to enforce the laws already on the books, and the main one is that part of the U.S. Code that states the aiding and abetting of illegal aliens is a FELONY.
I want to know when we are going to arrest and throw into jail politicians and business leaders who violate that part of the U.S. Code on a regular basis.
If we cannot even bring ourselves to enforce the laws already on the books, how in the HELL do we think a NEW law is going to clean up the mess any better?
Read the complete story of the murders committed by illegal aliens here:
http://wwwtmrcom.blogspot.com/2007/01/in-la-illegals-commit-90-of-murders.html
This is simply another example of the consequences of a reckless national policy on immigration--a policy that does not even pretend to enforce the laws that are already on the books.
Statements have been made by some in the debate over immigration that perhaps the driving force of the opposition to open borders and amnesty programs is that 'we don't want those kinds of people in the republic.'
You bet your sweet bottle of Corona I don't!
Why would I want to open up the country to gangs of thugs who plunder, pillage, pilfer, and perpetrate mayhem? Those who come here to work, learn English, become accustomed to our culture, and support our government and way of life are welcome. Those who come here for the freebies and to fly the Mexican flag are NOT welcome. It is simple as that.
In a city as large as Los Angeles and its near-uncontrollable crime problem, for over 90% of the murders to be committed by illegal aliens is nothing less than horrifying.
The nation's immigration problem is totally out of control, and the bill put forth by Ted 'Senator Blowhard' Kennedy and John McCain, and supported by George W. Bush, will NOT reign it in. We need to enforce the laws already on the books, and the main one is that part of the U.S. Code that states the aiding and abetting of illegal aliens is a FELONY.
I want to know when we are going to arrest and throw into jail politicians and business leaders who violate that part of the U.S. Code on a regular basis.
If we cannot even bring ourselves to enforce the laws already on the books, how in the HELL do we think a NEW law is going to clean up the mess any better?
Read the complete story of the murders committed by illegal aliens here:
http://wwwtmrcom.blogspot.com/2007/01/in-la-illegals-commit-90-of-murders.html
Tuesday, May 08, 2007
Advocacy Group Tells Illegal Aliens Not To Cooperate with Authorities
Washington, DC (TLS). A Maryland-based illegal alien advocacy group is advising illegals caught in raids not to cooperate with U.S. law enforcement authorities.
This is yet another perfect example of U.S. citizens committing outright felonies, in the open, by the aiding and abetting of illegal aliens, which is designated a felony by the United States Code.
From politicians to businesses to religious denominations to advocacy groups, a certain segment of today's America population is showing the rest of us that it couldn't care less about the rule of law in this country.
The so-called 'path to citizenship' for illegals is a joke. There is ALREADY a path to citizenship in this country. It is called THE LAW. U.S. Law provides the exact guidelines for those wishing to become citizens.
Why are we giving a pass to those who break the law? It simply makes no sense.
And it is clear that those who help them break the law are just as guilty as they are.
Read the story of the Maryland advocacy group's disregard for U.S. law here:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070507-120816-5796r.htm
This is yet another perfect example of U.S. citizens committing outright felonies, in the open, by the aiding and abetting of illegal aliens, which is designated a felony by the United States Code.
From politicians to businesses to religious denominations to advocacy groups, a certain segment of today's America population is showing the rest of us that it couldn't care less about the rule of law in this country.
The so-called 'path to citizenship' for illegals is a joke. There is ALREADY a path to citizenship in this country. It is called THE LAW. U.S. Law provides the exact guidelines for those wishing to become citizens.
Why are we giving a pass to those who break the law? It simply makes no sense.
And it is clear that those who help them break the law are just as guilty as they are.
Read the story of the Maryland advocacy group's disregard for U.S. law here:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070507-120816-5796r.htm
Sunday, March 11, 2007
Immigration Status an Important Question
Washington, DC (TLS). Let me present a hypothetical situation for a moment. In a small town in America a local police officer spots a group of persons of Hispanic descent traveling in a small auto that is seen running a red light. The officer turns on his blue light and pulls over the auto.
He asks to see the driver's license of the driver, but the driver does not understand his question, and says something in Spanish. The officer does not understand Spanish, so he shows the driver an example of what he's looking for. The driver indicates he has no such thing.
Thus, the officer has on his hands a situation where a car-full of Hispanics who do not speak English not only run a red light but do not possess a driver's license. He suspects that they are illegal aliens, but he is forbidden by his department from asking such a question.
What does the officer then do? Write a ticket? Allow them to continue driving after the ticket is issued? Take them in to the police station? Place them under arrest?
So far the charges against them are that they ran a red light and have no license to drive. These are not considered crimes but misdemeanors which are normally handled with much leniency.
Yet the officer knows that since no one in the group has a driver's license he will probably never see or hear from them ever again. Yet if he takes them into the police station for questioning, not only has he done more than one would do under normal conditions such a this, but in order to get at the heart of the matter, the subject of immigration status will come up. But he is not allowed to go there. Thus, his hands are tied.
My friends, this is precisely the predicament in which many law enforcement officials find themselves across America today. In many municipalities, such as New York City, officers are forbidden from inquiring about immigration status. In some school districts across the nation, immigration status cannot be asked of those who apply for jobs within those districts--as a matter of district policy.
Yet the United States Code specifically refers to the aiding and abetting of illegal aliens as a felony. A FELONY.
How on earth can one determine if someone has committed a felony if one cannot even inquire about the immigration status of the person in question?
And this is precisely the root of the problem. If you can't ask, then that lets off the hook any American who hires or otherwise aids and abets illegals. They can claim they did not know. How? Because their government is giving them a way around being charged with a felony.
Yes, their own government is encouraging citizens to engage in behavior that is described as a felony in the U.S. Code.
Any municipality, state, or school district that forbids inquiring about immigration status should be sued. Possible criminal charges should be brought against officials within those entities who proposed and implemented these felonious acts.
So far, the Bush Administration has done just enough window-dressing to claim it is doing something about the problem, such as the border fence, rounding up groups of illegals here and there. But it has failed miserably to attack the problem at its root--the government's own unwillingness to go after municipalities, school districts, and big businesses (and even some small businesses) that engage in aiding and abetting illegal aliens.
It is asinine to disallow law enforcement officers to inquire about the immigration status of persons living within that municipality. It is worse than asinine for a school district to hire persons without any verification of their immigration status. And it is a stinking, rotten travesty for American companies to get away with hiring persons who are known illegals, when federal law clearly prohibits it.
People who commit felonies should be prosecuted.
Why are we not doing it?
Who is encouraging doing nothing about it?
The LAW states these people are committing felonies.
They should be hauled to jail and charged with aiding and abetting illegal aliens under the provisions of the U.S. Code, which refers to their actions as a felony.
He asks to see the driver's license of the driver, but the driver does not understand his question, and says something in Spanish. The officer does not understand Spanish, so he shows the driver an example of what he's looking for. The driver indicates he has no such thing.
Thus, the officer has on his hands a situation where a car-full of Hispanics who do not speak English not only run a red light but do not possess a driver's license. He suspects that they are illegal aliens, but he is forbidden by his department from asking such a question.
What does the officer then do? Write a ticket? Allow them to continue driving after the ticket is issued? Take them in to the police station? Place them under arrest?
So far the charges against them are that they ran a red light and have no license to drive. These are not considered crimes but misdemeanors which are normally handled with much leniency.
Yet the officer knows that since no one in the group has a driver's license he will probably never see or hear from them ever again. Yet if he takes them into the police station for questioning, not only has he done more than one would do under normal conditions such a this, but in order to get at the heart of the matter, the subject of immigration status will come up. But he is not allowed to go there. Thus, his hands are tied.
My friends, this is precisely the predicament in which many law enforcement officials find themselves across America today. In many municipalities, such as New York City, officers are forbidden from inquiring about immigration status. In some school districts across the nation, immigration status cannot be asked of those who apply for jobs within those districts--as a matter of district policy.
Yet the United States Code specifically refers to the aiding and abetting of illegal aliens as a felony. A FELONY.
How on earth can one determine if someone has committed a felony if one cannot even inquire about the immigration status of the person in question?
And this is precisely the root of the problem. If you can't ask, then that lets off the hook any American who hires or otherwise aids and abets illegals. They can claim they did not know. How? Because their government is giving them a way around being charged with a felony.
Yes, their own government is encouraging citizens to engage in behavior that is described as a felony in the U.S. Code.
Any municipality, state, or school district that forbids inquiring about immigration status should be sued. Possible criminal charges should be brought against officials within those entities who proposed and implemented these felonious acts.
So far, the Bush Administration has done just enough window-dressing to claim it is doing something about the problem, such as the border fence, rounding up groups of illegals here and there. But it has failed miserably to attack the problem at its root--the government's own unwillingness to go after municipalities, school districts, and big businesses (and even some small businesses) that engage in aiding and abetting illegal aliens.
It is asinine to disallow law enforcement officers to inquire about the immigration status of persons living within that municipality. It is worse than asinine for a school district to hire persons without any verification of their immigration status. And it is a stinking, rotten travesty for American companies to get away with hiring persons who are known illegals, when federal law clearly prohibits it.
People who commit felonies should be prosecuted.
Why are we not doing it?
Who is encouraging doing nothing about it?
The LAW states these people are committing felonies.
They should be hauled to jail and charged with aiding and abetting illegal aliens under the provisions of the U.S. Code, which refers to their actions as a felony.
Friday, March 02, 2007
Government Helps Illegals Send Millions Back Home
Washington, DC (TLS). The Liberty Sphere has been closely monitoring the developments precipitated by Bank of America's announcement that it would offer credit cards to illegal aliens who have no Social Security number. It turns out that scores of banking institutions do the same thing, including Wells-Fargo, Citibank, J.P. Morgan/Chase, and others.
As it turns out, the federal government encourages such activity with the U.S. Treasury Department's guidelines that make it easy for illegal aliens within the U.S. to transfer money earned here back to Mexico.
According to U.S. House Representative Marsha Blackburn, R-TN, who serves on the House Financial Services Committee, illegals aliens have funneled millions of dollars back to Mexico through a special program offered by the U.S. Treasury Department. That money was never taxed.
Blackburn stated that it is time for investigations into the practices of the Treasury Department, as well as banking institutions that offer special programs to illegal aliens, in light of federal law that prohibits such activity.
The U.S. Code specifically states that aiding and abetting illegal aliens is a FELONY.
Section 8 of U.S. Code 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii) makes the aiding and abetting of illegal aliens a felony with a 6-year statute of limitations.
It is intriguing, to say the very least, that the U.S. Government has treated a FELONY with such a lackadaisical attitude that not only can countless U.S. companies get away with hiring illegal aliens but the federal government itself can aid and abet illegal aliens by failing to enforce immigration laws and by prosecuting law enforcement agents who attempt in good faith to enforce those laws.
Let's not forget that two U.S. Border Patrol Agents are rotting in prison because they dared to enforce immigration law against a known Mexican drug smuggler.
Increasingly lawmakers such as Marsha Blackburn are demanding to know how and why so many U.S. laws can be broken, including FELONIES, and yet to date no one has suffered the
consequences.
My friends, when the federal government consistently looks the other way while felonies are committed against this country by the aiding and abetting of illegal aliens, something is systemically wrong with our government. Up until now, the government apparently has counted on most citizens not caring. Increasingly they care very much. And you can rest assured the next election will exhibit the outrage most Americans feel about the trashing of our nation by illegal aliens and the government officials and companies that help them do it.
As it turns out, the federal government encourages such activity with the U.S. Treasury Department's guidelines that make it easy for illegal aliens within the U.S. to transfer money earned here back to Mexico.
According to U.S. House Representative Marsha Blackburn, R-TN, who serves on the House Financial Services Committee, illegals aliens have funneled millions of dollars back to Mexico through a special program offered by the U.S. Treasury Department. That money was never taxed.
Blackburn stated that it is time for investigations into the practices of the Treasury Department, as well as banking institutions that offer special programs to illegal aliens, in light of federal law that prohibits such activity.
The U.S. Code specifically states that aiding and abetting illegal aliens is a FELONY.
Section 8 of U.S. Code 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii) makes the aiding and abetting of illegal aliens a felony with a 6-year statute of limitations.
It is intriguing, to say the very least, that the U.S. Government has treated a FELONY with such a lackadaisical attitude that not only can countless U.S. companies get away with hiring illegal aliens but the federal government itself can aid and abet illegal aliens by failing to enforce immigration laws and by prosecuting law enforcement agents who attempt in good faith to enforce those laws.
Let's not forget that two U.S. Border Patrol Agents are rotting in prison because they dared to enforce immigration law against a known Mexican drug smuggler.
Increasingly lawmakers such as Marsha Blackburn are demanding to know how and why so many U.S. laws can be broken, including FELONIES, and yet to date no one has suffered the
consequences.
My friends, when the federal government consistently looks the other way while felonies are committed against this country by the aiding and abetting of illegal aliens, something is systemically wrong with our government. Up until now, the government apparently has counted on most citizens not caring. Increasingly they care very much. And you can rest assured the next election will exhibit the outrage most Americans feel about the trashing of our nation by illegal aliens and the government officials and companies that help them do it.
Sunday, February 11, 2007
Breaking News: Border Patrol Agents Fired
Washington, DC (TLS). The Liberty Sphere has learned that two Border Patrol Agents whose testimony secured the conviction of two of their colleagues in what has become known as 'the Border Patrol Hoax' are to be fired by the agency. A third Agent who testified against the two Agents who are now in prison has resigned.
This news comes on the heels of reports that the three Agents in question changed their testimony several times, which of course taints the entirety of their depositions. This is precisely what happened in Durham, North Carolina when the accuser in the Duke Lacrosse Rape Hoax changed her story so many times that the entire case fell apart, resulting in the District Attorney being charged with ethics violations and prosecutorial misconduct.
The big question, however, is this: were the Agents fired and pressured to resign because they changed their story thus putting U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton and the Department of Homeland Security is a terribly bad light, or were they fired and pressured to resign because their initial testimony was shown to be false? This is a central question that MUST be answered, for if the termination of employment of the three Agents is in any way retaliation from Sutton, Judge Cardone, the Border Patrol, or the Department of Homeland Security, then this scandal has just gotten deeper and even more despicable. The same can be said if the powers-that-be in this case are making scapegoats out of the three Agents for a scheme that was concocted at the highest levels of government.
No matter which way you cut it, Sutton, Judge Cardone, the Department of Homeland Security, and who knows who else, are all implicated in this sordid mess. Too much evidence has been made public for there to be any other conclusion.
Thus, every single person in government who was in any way connected with this case should be tried in a court of law for falsely convicting two innocent men. This is a crime, a felony, in the United States of America. And as long as we coddle and handle with kid gloves the likes of Mike Nifong and Johnny Sutton the entire system of justice in America is on the brink of collapse.
Read the full story here:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54196
This news comes on the heels of reports that the three Agents in question changed their testimony several times, which of course taints the entirety of their depositions. This is precisely what happened in Durham, North Carolina when the accuser in the Duke Lacrosse Rape Hoax changed her story so many times that the entire case fell apart, resulting in the District Attorney being charged with ethics violations and prosecutorial misconduct.
The big question, however, is this: were the Agents fired and pressured to resign because they changed their story thus putting U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton and the Department of Homeland Security is a terribly bad light, or were they fired and pressured to resign because their initial testimony was shown to be false? This is a central question that MUST be answered, for if the termination of employment of the three Agents is in any way retaliation from Sutton, Judge Cardone, the Border Patrol, or the Department of Homeland Security, then this scandal has just gotten deeper and even more despicable. The same can be said if the powers-that-be in this case are making scapegoats out of the three Agents for a scheme that was concocted at the highest levels of government.
No matter which way you cut it, Sutton, Judge Cardone, the Department of Homeland Security, and who knows who else, are all implicated in this sordid mess. Too much evidence has been made public for there to be any other conclusion.
Thus, every single person in government who was in any way connected with this case should be tried in a court of law for falsely convicting two innocent men. This is a crime, a felony, in the United States of America. And as long as we coddle and handle with kid gloves the likes of Mike Nifong and Johnny Sutton the entire system of justice in America is on the brink of collapse.
Read the full story here:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54196
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)