Congressional Republicans have succeeded in attaching an amendment to an important appropriations bill. The amendment cuts off federal funds from being used for the incarceration of Border Patrol Agents Ramos and Compean.
The withdrawal of funds for the imprisonment of the two falsely accused Border Patrol agents will mean their release from prison.
Congress is expected to pass the appropriations bill containing the amendment.
One Republican Congressman observed that President Bush will likely sign the bill, in spite of the fact that it contains a provision aimed at doing what he has yet refused to do--release the two Agents.
The Congressman suggested that the President has more to lose by refusing to sign the appropriations bill than he would by vetoing the measure because of the amendment. The President has been under enormous political pressure, most of it from members of his own Party, to release the two Agents.
By signing the appropriations bill containing an amendment that will lead to the Agents' release, the President can save face. He doesn't have to say a word about the amendment. But those who have been adamant about the Agents' release get what they want.
The problem is what happens afterwards. Will investigations by Congressional Republicans simply dry up due to the fact that Ramos and Compean are set free?
What about their reputations which have been soiled by the lies of the DOJ and the DHS, which painted the two men as 'bad cops'?
What about the lies to Congress?
What about the systematic suppression of law enforcement at our southern border perpetrated by a rogue U.S. Attorney who apparently wishes to appease the Mexican government more than he wishes to obey the law?
Will Congress simply try to sweep the entire fiasco under the rug by the release of Ramos and Compean, hoping that the citizens forget that both the Bush Administration and Congressional Democrats have been grossly negligent in enforcing U.S. laws concerning illegal aliens and in making our borders secure?
We can only hope that statesmen like Duncan Hunter, Tom Tancredo, Dana Rohrabacher, and many others, including conservative Democrats, will never stop digging until they discover the ugly truth behind the Border Patrol scandal, and then take pertinent steps to clean out the corruption.
Showing posts with label felonies committed by government officials. Show all posts
Showing posts with label felonies committed by government officials. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 31, 2007
Sunday, June 24, 2007
Video Shows Hillary Clinton Committing Felonies
Saluda, NC (TLS). Some time ago The Liberty Sphere reported that our sources following the various Presidential campaigns informed us that the Hillary Clinton campaign was fighting with all its might to keep the candidate out of court concerning a scandal that may implicate both Hillary and Bill in felonies.
Late this week World Net Daily News obtained a copy of a videotape that shows Hillary Clinton engaging in committing at least 2 felonies!
You can watch that 5-minute video by clicking on the link here:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56305
It seems that the Clinton campaign is going to have a very hard time keeping the lid on this one. We may have a criminal trial before the 2008 election!
Late this week World Net Daily News obtained a copy of a videotape that shows Hillary Clinton engaging in committing at least 2 felonies!
You can watch that 5-minute video by clicking on the link here:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56305
It seems that the Clinton campaign is going to have a very hard time keeping the lid on this one. We may have a criminal trial before the 2008 election!
Thursday, June 07, 2007
House Dems Slow To Investigate William Jefferson
Washington, DC (TLS). House Democrats are dragging their feet, as expected, in investigating the corruption of Rep. William Jefferson, D-Louisiana, who has been charged with multiple counts of money laundering, bribery, and racketeering.
Jefferson is the Congressman who was caught with $90,000 in cash hidden in his freezer in his residence.
In spite of the dark cloud of corruption hanging over the head of Jefferson, Congress has not investigated him, and his home district of New Orleans re-elected him to office.
In spite of the federal indictments on several felony charges, the Democrat-controlled Congress is still in no hurry to investigate Jefferson. Apparently Pelosi is concerned about corruption only when it comes to Republicans.
And apparently committing felonies is fine as long as you have the 'Big D' beside your name.
Jefferson is the Congressman who was caught with $90,000 in cash hidden in his freezer in his residence.
In spite of the dark cloud of corruption hanging over the head of Jefferson, Congress has not investigated him, and his home district of New Orleans re-elected him to office.
In spite of the federal indictments on several felony charges, the Democrat-controlled Congress is still in no hurry to investigate Jefferson. Apparently Pelosi is concerned about corruption only when it comes to Republicans.
And apparently committing felonies is fine as long as you have the 'Big D' beside your name.
Tuesday, June 05, 2007
HOUSE DEMOCRAT CHARGED WITH MULTIPLE FELONIES
Washington, DC (TLS). U.S. Representative William Jefferson, D-Louisiana, has been charged with multiple counts of felonies, including bribery, racketeering, and money-laundering, in a stinging indictment that could potentially carry a 235-year term of imprisonment.
Two years ago investigators found $90,000 in cash hidden in a freezer in Jefferson's residence.
Yet voters in the New Orleans Congressional district elected Jefferson to another term even as a dark cloud of corruption enveloped him.
In addition, the ethically-challenged House of Representatives run by Nancy Pelosi has essentially abdicated its responsibility in following-up on the evidence of gross corruption on the part of Jefferson. The Democrats were elected to a majority in the House partially based upon promises to 'clean up the corruption.' Once in office, however, it was business as usual, not only with the Jefferson case but also with other high-profile corruption cases.
The Republican minority reported late Monday that it intends to force a vote on expulsion for Jefferson in light of today's revelation.
The Liberty Sphere agrees that this is the best course of action, unless Jefferson decides to resign. The charges against him are serious enough that it would be the right thing to do to step down while he deals with the legal ramifications of one of the worst offenses a public servant can commit--that of using his office to take bribes from foreign countries.
Two years ago investigators found $90,000 in cash hidden in a freezer in Jefferson's residence.
Yet voters in the New Orleans Congressional district elected Jefferson to another term even as a dark cloud of corruption enveloped him.
In addition, the ethically-challenged House of Representatives run by Nancy Pelosi has essentially abdicated its responsibility in following-up on the evidence of gross corruption on the part of Jefferson. The Democrats were elected to a majority in the House partially based upon promises to 'clean up the corruption.' Once in office, however, it was business as usual, not only with the Jefferson case but also with other high-profile corruption cases.
The Republican minority reported late Monday that it intends to force a vote on expulsion for Jefferson in light of today's revelation.
The Liberty Sphere agrees that this is the best course of action, unless Jefferson decides to resign. The charges against him are serious enough that it would be the right thing to do to step down while he deals with the legal ramifications of one of the worst offenses a public servant can commit--that of using his office to take bribes from foreign countries.
Monday, May 21, 2007
Illegal Aliens Commit 90% of Murders in L.A.
Los Angeles, CA (TLS). Here's an eye-opener for you. Statistics from the Los Angeles Police Department and the California Department of Justice show that illegal aliens commit over 90% of the murders in Los Angeles.
This is simply another example of the consequences of a reckless national policy on immigration--a policy that does not even pretend to enforce the laws that are already on the books.
Statements have been made by some in the debate over immigration that perhaps the driving force of the opposition to open borders and amnesty programs is that 'we don't want those kinds of people in the republic.'
You bet your sweet bottle of Corona I don't!
Why would I want to open up the country to gangs of thugs who plunder, pillage, pilfer, and perpetrate mayhem? Those who come here to work, learn English, become accustomed to our culture, and support our government and way of life are welcome. Those who come here for the freebies and to fly the Mexican flag are NOT welcome. It is simple as that.
In a city as large as Los Angeles and its near-uncontrollable crime problem, for over 90% of the murders to be committed by illegal aliens is nothing less than horrifying.
The nation's immigration problem is totally out of control, and the bill put forth by Ted 'Senator Blowhard' Kennedy and John McCain, and supported by George W. Bush, will NOT reign it in. We need to enforce the laws already on the books, and the main one is that part of the U.S. Code that states the aiding and abetting of illegal aliens is a FELONY.
I want to know when we are going to arrest and throw into jail politicians and business leaders who violate that part of the U.S. Code on a regular basis.
If we cannot even bring ourselves to enforce the laws already on the books, how in the HELL do we think a NEW law is going to clean up the mess any better?
Read the complete story of the murders committed by illegal aliens here:
http://wwwtmrcom.blogspot.com/2007/01/in-la-illegals-commit-90-of-murders.html
This is simply another example of the consequences of a reckless national policy on immigration--a policy that does not even pretend to enforce the laws that are already on the books.
Statements have been made by some in the debate over immigration that perhaps the driving force of the opposition to open borders and amnesty programs is that 'we don't want those kinds of people in the republic.'
You bet your sweet bottle of Corona I don't!
Why would I want to open up the country to gangs of thugs who plunder, pillage, pilfer, and perpetrate mayhem? Those who come here to work, learn English, become accustomed to our culture, and support our government and way of life are welcome. Those who come here for the freebies and to fly the Mexican flag are NOT welcome. It is simple as that.
In a city as large as Los Angeles and its near-uncontrollable crime problem, for over 90% of the murders to be committed by illegal aliens is nothing less than horrifying.
The nation's immigration problem is totally out of control, and the bill put forth by Ted 'Senator Blowhard' Kennedy and John McCain, and supported by George W. Bush, will NOT reign it in. We need to enforce the laws already on the books, and the main one is that part of the U.S. Code that states the aiding and abetting of illegal aliens is a FELONY.
I want to know when we are going to arrest and throw into jail politicians and business leaders who violate that part of the U.S. Code on a regular basis.
If we cannot even bring ourselves to enforce the laws already on the books, how in the HELL do we think a NEW law is going to clean up the mess any better?
Read the complete story of the murders committed by illegal aliens here:
http://wwwtmrcom.blogspot.com/2007/01/in-la-illegals-commit-90-of-murders.html
Thursday, April 26, 2007
What's Going on with Cities that Defy U.S. Law?
Washington, DC (TLS). First it was San Francisco. Now Oakland. And of course, Virginia Beach has been caught red-handed doing the very same thing.
What do these and other U.S. cities have in common?
They are breaking the law. In fact, they are committing felonies.
The Mayor of San Francisco stated earlier this week that his city would be a 'safe haven' for illegal aliens and would defy any federal order to stop the practice. Today, we received word that Oakland will do the very same thing.
Several weeks ago, Virginia Beach, Virginia was exposed by Bill O'Reilley for being a town that defies U.S. law by granting safe haven to foreign law-breakers.
There are several salient points we need to remember about this practice.
First, if the federal government allows these cities to get away with this, then George Wallace and the cities of Birmingham, Montgomery, and Tuscaloosa, Alabama were correct in defying de-segregation orders from the federal government during the Civil Rights era.
In short, if Constitutional law is not the prevailing law of the land--the entirety of the land--then those towns in Alabama had as much a right to defy the law by continuing segregation as San Francisco has to defy the U.S. Code in aiding and abetting illegal aliens (which is a felony).
Second, if these cities persist in defying federal law, then the rest of the country should demand that Congress immediately withdraw the funding of millions of dollars' worth of projects that benefit those cities, using our tax dollars. I don't want my tax money being used to support a municipality that willfully and openly defies the law of the land. And, to be fair, these cities should not even expect the government to give them any money, since they obviously have no respect for its Constitution and laws.
In addition, we should also make it clear to these towns that they will no longer be afforded the
protection of the U.S. military in the event of a terrorist attack or any other siege upon them.
If they don't play by the same rules that the rest of us are forced to play by, then they don't get the defense of the military I proudly support--particularly a place like San Francisco, which is unabashedly anti-military.
They can fend for themselves if they are attacked.
Third, it is time we began to demand that our elected officials enforce the provisions of the U.S. Code, which clearly states that aiding and abetting illegal aliens is a felony that carries with it certain punishments determined by the courts.
City government officials who defy the law and openly encourage others to do so should be immediately arrested and sent to jail. Once they are charged with the felonies they have committed, they can then argue their case in a court of law.
So, what, exactly, is preventing the immediate arrest of the Mayors of San Francisco, Oakland, Virginia Beach, and other so-called 'safe haven' cities? They have openly stated before all of America that they are defying the law and will continue to do so. We have them on tape stating these things. It should be fairly easy to prove in court that they are guilty of felonies.
Why are we not enforcing the rule of law in this country?
As it stands now, these are renegade cities that are run by renegade, out of control Mayors and other city officials. If we let them do this, then how can we with any integrity enforce ANY federal law ANYWHERE?
What if my town down south decides that it is going to be a 'safe haven' city for members of the Klu Klux Klan who are on the run from the FBI?
If San Francisco can pull this shameful, in-your-face defiance of the rule of law, then what is to prevent any town in America from doing the same thing with OTHER issues?
Until this practice is stopped cold by placing city officials under arrest and charged with felonies, then this nation is on the brink of imploding from the lack of the moral authority to govern. Without the rule of law as established by the Constitution and the U.S. Code, then we are stuck in a time-warp prior to the Civil War when some of us thought that local governments could defy federal law.
We already fought one war over that issue. We don't need another one. Put the perpetrators in jail where they belong.
What do these and other U.S. cities have in common?
They are breaking the law. In fact, they are committing felonies.
The Mayor of San Francisco stated earlier this week that his city would be a 'safe haven' for illegal aliens and would defy any federal order to stop the practice. Today, we received word that Oakland will do the very same thing.
Several weeks ago, Virginia Beach, Virginia was exposed by Bill O'Reilley for being a town that defies U.S. law by granting safe haven to foreign law-breakers.
There are several salient points we need to remember about this practice.
First, if the federal government allows these cities to get away with this, then George Wallace and the cities of Birmingham, Montgomery, and Tuscaloosa, Alabama were correct in defying de-segregation orders from the federal government during the Civil Rights era.
In short, if Constitutional law is not the prevailing law of the land--the entirety of the land--then those towns in Alabama had as much a right to defy the law by continuing segregation as San Francisco has to defy the U.S. Code in aiding and abetting illegal aliens (which is a felony).
Second, if these cities persist in defying federal law, then the rest of the country should demand that Congress immediately withdraw the funding of millions of dollars' worth of projects that benefit those cities, using our tax dollars. I don't want my tax money being used to support a municipality that willfully and openly defies the law of the land. And, to be fair, these cities should not even expect the government to give them any money, since they obviously have no respect for its Constitution and laws.
In addition, we should also make it clear to these towns that they will no longer be afforded the
protection of the U.S. military in the event of a terrorist attack or any other siege upon them.
If they don't play by the same rules that the rest of us are forced to play by, then they don't get the defense of the military I proudly support--particularly a place like San Francisco, which is unabashedly anti-military.
They can fend for themselves if they are attacked.
Third, it is time we began to demand that our elected officials enforce the provisions of the U.S. Code, which clearly states that aiding and abetting illegal aliens is a felony that carries with it certain punishments determined by the courts.
City government officials who defy the law and openly encourage others to do so should be immediately arrested and sent to jail. Once they are charged with the felonies they have committed, they can then argue their case in a court of law.
So, what, exactly, is preventing the immediate arrest of the Mayors of San Francisco, Oakland, Virginia Beach, and other so-called 'safe haven' cities? They have openly stated before all of America that they are defying the law and will continue to do so. We have them on tape stating these things. It should be fairly easy to prove in court that they are guilty of felonies.
Why are we not enforcing the rule of law in this country?
As it stands now, these are renegade cities that are run by renegade, out of control Mayors and other city officials. If we let them do this, then how can we with any integrity enforce ANY federal law ANYWHERE?
What if my town down south decides that it is going to be a 'safe haven' city for members of the Klu Klux Klan who are on the run from the FBI?
If San Francisco can pull this shameful, in-your-face defiance of the rule of law, then what is to prevent any town in America from doing the same thing with OTHER issues?
Until this practice is stopped cold by placing city officials under arrest and charged with felonies, then this nation is on the brink of imploding from the lack of the moral authority to govern. Without the rule of law as established by the Constitution and the U.S. Code, then we are stuck in a time-warp prior to the Civil War when some of us thought that local governments could defy federal law.
We already fought one war over that issue. We don't need another one. Put the perpetrators in jail where they belong.
Sunday, March 11, 2007
Kennedy the Felon
Washington, DC (TLS). In 1965 Senator Ted Kennedy, D-MA--known on The Liberty Sphere as 'Senator Blowhard'--vigorously pushed an immigration reform bill that would become a watershed moment not only in American politics but in American culture. The Immigration Reform Act of 1965 would forever change the face of America, opening the floodgates to unskilled poor laborers from Third World countries and limiting the quotas on skilled workers from the European countries that founded this nation.
To put it succinctly, Kennedy insured that the quotas on immigration would be changed to favor the Third World and to place severe limits on the number of Europeans who could immigrate to the U.S.
At the time Kennedy arrogantly denounced the Bill's detractors, claiming the legislation would most definitely NOT result in our cities being flooded with at least a million immigrants per year, and that the ethnic mix within these cities would NOT change.
Kennedy lied.
Not only did the flood gates open to millions of new immigrants annually but the racial and ethnic makeup of our cities changed drastically as tens of thousands of persons from the Third World, such as Latin America, Africa, and Asia, flooded our metropolitan areas.
By 1986 the problem had become so dire that the citizens pressured their representatives in Washington to act. They acted alright. But what they did was anything but stemming the tide of the onslaught.
Once again it was Senator Blowhard who led the fight, introducing and supporting a measure known as the 'Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986.'
When Kennedy heard the outcry of Americans that politicians do something about illegal aliens, he heard in his own head, 'Legalize them and they won't be illegal aliens.'
The legislation amounted to nothing more than a massive granting of amnesty to illegal aliens. 2.9 million illegals were legalized and granted citizenship under Kennedy's leadership. The bill contained a provision that imposed employer sanctions so that such a thing would supposedly never happen again.
Or as Kennedy put it at the time, 'This will be the end of illegal immigration.'
End of story, right? Not so fast.
During the Clinton years of the 1990s, illegal aliens began flooding the country yet again. First, we were told there were 3 million. Then 5 million. But by the time it was all over we had at least 20 million illegal aliens living in this country.
This outrage continues today as the government turns its head to felons who hire illegal aliens, and as that very government encourages the aiding and abetting of law-breakers by telling them not to inquire as to the immigration status of these persons--which makes the government officials themselves felons.
The outcry from the public is reaching a fever pitch. Clearly Americans by overwhelming majorities want to stop the flow of illegal aliens into this country.
But once again guess who is on the forefront of this issue and once again hearing in his own mind the outcry of citizens to be, 'Let's take care of the problem by legalizing them!'? None other than Senator Teddy 'Blowhard' Kennedy.
Kennedy wants to make legal citizens overnight out of over 20 million illegal aliens who broke the law in coming here without due process. 20 MILLION. Thus, in one swipe of the pen in signing such legislation, 20 million people that we know nothing about, whose background is a mystery, would immediately and unequivocally become legal U.S. citizens.
Once again, what does the LAW, the U.S. Code, say about those who aid and abet illegal aliens? It says they are FELONS. That to act in any way as to aid and abet illegals is a felony in the United States of America.
Senator Ted Kennedy is committing a felony, therefore, just as he has twice before, not counting his Chappaquiddick 'dead woman in the car' mystery.
And guess what? President George W. Bush is pushing such legislation as well, thus betraying the very people who put him in office.
20 million illegal aliens becoming legal citizens overnight, without having to do what honorable people have done in going through the naturalization process legally. This is an outrage to any honorable law-abiding American. The citizens should let their voices be heard NOW. We want the flow of illegal aliens into this country STOPPED, NOT by making them legal, but by enforcing U.S. laws that are already on the books.
To put it succinctly, Kennedy insured that the quotas on immigration would be changed to favor the Third World and to place severe limits on the number of Europeans who could immigrate to the U.S.
At the time Kennedy arrogantly denounced the Bill's detractors, claiming the legislation would most definitely NOT result in our cities being flooded with at least a million immigrants per year, and that the ethnic mix within these cities would NOT change.
Kennedy lied.
Not only did the flood gates open to millions of new immigrants annually but the racial and ethnic makeup of our cities changed drastically as tens of thousands of persons from the Third World, such as Latin America, Africa, and Asia, flooded our metropolitan areas.
By 1986 the problem had become so dire that the citizens pressured their representatives in Washington to act. They acted alright. But what they did was anything but stemming the tide of the onslaught.
Once again it was Senator Blowhard who led the fight, introducing and supporting a measure known as the 'Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986.'
When Kennedy heard the outcry of Americans that politicians do something about illegal aliens, he heard in his own head, 'Legalize them and they won't be illegal aliens.'
The legislation amounted to nothing more than a massive granting of amnesty to illegal aliens. 2.9 million illegals were legalized and granted citizenship under Kennedy's leadership. The bill contained a provision that imposed employer sanctions so that such a thing would supposedly never happen again.
Or as Kennedy put it at the time, 'This will be the end of illegal immigration.'
End of story, right? Not so fast.
During the Clinton years of the 1990s, illegal aliens began flooding the country yet again. First, we were told there were 3 million. Then 5 million. But by the time it was all over we had at least 20 million illegal aliens living in this country.
This outrage continues today as the government turns its head to felons who hire illegal aliens, and as that very government encourages the aiding and abetting of law-breakers by telling them not to inquire as to the immigration status of these persons--which makes the government officials themselves felons.
The outcry from the public is reaching a fever pitch. Clearly Americans by overwhelming majorities want to stop the flow of illegal aliens into this country.
But once again guess who is on the forefront of this issue and once again hearing in his own mind the outcry of citizens to be, 'Let's take care of the problem by legalizing them!'? None other than Senator Teddy 'Blowhard' Kennedy.
Kennedy wants to make legal citizens overnight out of over 20 million illegal aliens who broke the law in coming here without due process. 20 MILLION. Thus, in one swipe of the pen in signing such legislation, 20 million people that we know nothing about, whose background is a mystery, would immediately and unequivocally become legal U.S. citizens.
Once again, what does the LAW, the U.S. Code, say about those who aid and abet illegal aliens? It says they are FELONS. That to act in any way as to aid and abet illegals is a felony in the United States of America.
Senator Ted Kennedy is committing a felony, therefore, just as he has twice before, not counting his Chappaquiddick 'dead woman in the car' mystery.
And guess what? President George W. Bush is pushing such legislation as well, thus betraying the very people who put him in office.
20 million illegal aliens becoming legal citizens overnight, without having to do what honorable people have done in going through the naturalization process legally. This is an outrage to any honorable law-abiding American. The citizens should let their voices be heard NOW. We want the flow of illegal aliens into this country STOPPED, NOT by making them legal, but by enforcing U.S. laws that are already on the books.
Immigration Status an Important Question
Washington, DC (TLS). Let me present a hypothetical situation for a moment. In a small town in America a local police officer spots a group of persons of Hispanic descent traveling in a small auto that is seen running a red light. The officer turns on his blue light and pulls over the auto.
He asks to see the driver's license of the driver, but the driver does not understand his question, and says something in Spanish. The officer does not understand Spanish, so he shows the driver an example of what he's looking for. The driver indicates he has no such thing.
Thus, the officer has on his hands a situation where a car-full of Hispanics who do not speak English not only run a red light but do not possess a driver's license. He suspects that they are illegal aliens, but he is forbidden by his department from asking such a question.
What does the officer then do? Write a ticket? Allow them to continue driving after the ticket is issued? Take them in to the police station? Place them under arrest?
So far the charges against them are that they ran a red light and have no license to drive. These are not considered crimes but misdemeanors which are normally handled with much leniency.
Yet the officer knows that since no one in the group has a driver's license he will probably never see or hear from them ever again. Yet if he takes them into the police station for questioning, not only has he done more than one would do under normal conditions such a this, but in order to get at the heart of the matter, the subject of immigration status will come up. But he is not allowed to go there. Thus, his hands are tied.
My friends, this is precisely the predicament in which many law enforcement officials find themselves across America today. In many municipalities, such as New York City, officers are forbidden from inquiring about immigration status. In some school districts across the nation, immigration status cannot be asked of those who apply for jobs within those districts--as a matter of district policy.
Yet the United States Code specifically refers to the aiding and abetting of illegal aliens as a felony. A FELONY.
How on earth can one determine if someone has committed a felony if one cannot even inquire about the immigration status of the person in question?
And this is precisely the root of the problem. If you can't ask, then that lets off the hook any American who hires or otherwise aids and abets illegals. They can claim they did not know. How? Because their government is giving them a way around being charged with a felony.
Yes, their own government is encouraging citizens to engage in behavior that is described as a felony in the U.S. Code.
Any municipality, state, or school district that forbids inquiring about immigration status should be sued. Possible criminal charges should be brought against officials within those entities who proposed and implemented these felonious acts.
So far, the Bush Administration has done just enough window-dressing to claim it is doing something about the problem, such as the border fence, rounding up groups of illegals here and there. But it has failed miserably to attack the problem at its root--the government's own unwillingness to go after municipalities, school districts, and big businesses (and even some small businesses) that engage in aiding and abetting illegal aliens.
It is asinine to disallow law enforcement officers to inquire about the immigration status of persons living within that municipality. It is worse than asinine for a school district to hire persons without any verification of their immigration status. And it is a stinking, rotten travesty for American companies to get away with hiring persons who are known illegals, when federal law clearly prohibits it.
People who commit felonies should be prosecuted.
Why are we not doing it?
Who is encouraging doing nothing about it?
The LAW states these people are committing felonies.
They should be hauled to jail and charged with aiding and abetting illegal aliens under the provisions of the U.S. Code, which refers to their actions as a felony.
He asks to see the driver's license of the driver, but the driver does not understand his question, and says something in Spanish. The officer does not understand Spanish, so he shows the driver an example of what he's looking for. The driver indicates he has no such thing.
Thus, the officer has on his hands a situation where a car-full of Hispanics who do not speak English not only run a red light but do not possess a driver's license. He suspects that they are illegal aliens, but he is forbidden by his department from asking such a question.
What does the officer then do? Write a ticket? Allow them to continue driving after the ticket is issued? Take them in to the police station? Place them under arrest?
So far the charges against them are that they ran a red light and have no license to drive. These are not considered crimes but misdemeanors which are normally handled with much leniency.
Yet the officer knows that since no one in the group has a driver's license he will probably never see or hear from them ever again. Yet if he takes them into the police station for questioning, not only has he done more than one would do under normal conditions such a this, but in order to get at the heart of the matter, the subject of immigration status will come up. But he is not allowed to go there. Thus, his hands are tied.
My friends, this is precisely the predicament in which many law enforcement officials find themselves across America today. In many municipalities, such as New York City, officers are forbidden from inquiring about immigration status. In some school districts across the nation, immigration status cannot be asked of those who apply for jobs within those districts--as a matter of district policy.
Yet the United States Code specifically refers to the aiding and abetting of illegal aliens as a felony. A FELONY.
How on earth can one determine if someone has committed a felony if one cannot even inquire about the immigration status of the person in question?
And this is precisely the root of the problem. If you can't ask, then that lets off the hook any American who hires or otherwise aids and abets illegals. They can claim they did not know. How? Because their government is giving them a way around being charged with a felony.
Yes, their own government is encouraging citizens to engage in behavior that is described as a felony in the U.S. Code.
Any municipality, state, or school district that forbids inquiring about immigration status should be sued. Possible criminal charges should be brought against officials within those entities who proposed and implemented these felonious acts.
So far, the Bush Administration has done just enough window-dressing to claim it is doing something about the problem, such as the border fence, rounding up groups of illegals here and there. But it has failed miserably to attack the problem at its root--the government's own unwillingness to go after municipalities, school districts, and big businesses (and even some small businesses) that engage in aiding and abetting illegal aliens.
It is asinine to disallow law enforcement officers to inquire about the immigration status of persons living within that municipality. It is worse than asinine for a school district to hire persons without any verification of their immigration status. And it is a stinking, rotten travesty for American companies to get away with hiring persons who are known illegals, when federal law clearly prohibits it.
People who commit felonies should be prosecuted.
Why are we not doing it?
Who is encouraging doing nothing about it?
The LAW states these people are committing felonies.
They should be hauled to jail and charged with aiding and abetting illegal aliens under the provisions of the U.S. Code, which refers to their actions as a felony.
Friday, March 02, 2007
Government Helps Illegals Send Millions Back Home
Washington, DC (TLS). The Liberty Sphere has been closely monitoring the developments precipitated by Bank of America's announcement that it would offer credit cards to illegal aliens who have no Social Security number. It turns out that scores of banking institutions do the same thing, including Wells-Fargo, Citibank, J.P. Morgan/Chase, and others.
As it turns out, the federal government encourages such activity with the U.S. Treasury Department's guidelines that make it easy for illegal aliens within the U.S. to transfer money earned here back to Mexico.
According to U.S. House Representative Marsha Blackburn, R-TN, who serves on the House Financial Services Committee, illegals aliens have funneled millions of dollars back to Mexico through a special program offered by the U.S. Treasury Department. That money was never taxed.
Blackburn stated that it is time for investigations into the practices of the Treasury Department, as well as banking institutions that offer special programs to illegal aliens, in light of federal law that prohibits such activity.
The U.S. Code specifically states that aiding and abetting illegal aliens is a FELONY.
Section 8 of U.S. Code 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii) makes the aiding and abetting of illegal aliens a felony with a 6-year statute of limitations.
It is intriguing, to say the very least, that the U.S. Government has treated a FELONY with such a lackadaisical attitude that not only can countless U.S. companies get away with hiring illegal aliens but the federal government itself can aid and abet illegal aliens by failing to enforce immigration laws and by prosecuting law enforcement agents who attempt in good faith to enforce those laws.
Let's not forget that two U.S. Border Patrol Agents are rotting in prison because they dared to enforce immigration law against a known Mexican drug smuggler.
Increasingly lawmakers such as Marsha Blackburn are demanding to know how and why so many U.S. laws can be broken, including FELONIES, and yet to date no one has suffered the
consequences.
My friends, when the federal government consistently looks the other way while felonies are committed against this country by the aiding and abetting of illegal aliens, something is systemically wrong with our government. Up until now, the government apparently has counted on most citizens not caring. Increasingly they care very much. And you can rest assured the next election will exhibit the outrage most Americans feel about the trashing of our nation by illegal aliens and the government officials and companies that help them do it.
As it turns out, the federal government encourages such activity with the U.S. Treasury Department's guidelines that make it easy for illegal aliens within the U.S. to transfer money earned here back to Mexico.
According to U.S. House Representative Marsha Blackburn, R-TN, who serves on the House Financial Services Committee, illegals aliens have funneled millions of dollars back to Mexico through a special program offered by the U.S. Treasury Department. That money was never taxed.
Blackburn stated that it is time for investigations into the practices of the Treasury Department, as well as banking institutions that offer special programs to illegal aliens, in light of federal law that prohibits such activity.
The U.S. Code specifically states that aiding and abetting illegal aliens is a FELONY.
Section 8 of U.S. Code 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii) makes the aiding and abetting of illegal aliens a felony with a 6-year statute of limitations.
It is intriguing, to say the very least, that the U.S. Government has treated a FELONY with such a lackadaisical attitude that not only can countless U.S. companies get away with hiring illegal aliens but the federal government itself can aid and abet illegal aliens by failing to enforce immigration laws and by prosecuting law enforcement agents who attempt in good faith to enforce those laws.
Let's not forget that two U.S. Border Patrol Agents are rotting in prison because they dared to enforce immigration law against a known Mexican drug smuggler.
Increasingly lawmakers such as Marsha Blackburn are demanding to know how and why so many U.S. laws can be broken, including FELONIES, and yet to date no one has suffered the
consequences.
My friends, when the federal government consistently looks the other way while felonies are committed against this country by the aiding and abetting of illegal aliens, something is systemically wrong with our government. Up until now, the government apparently has counted on most citizens not caring. Increasingly they care very much. And you can rest assured the next election will exhibit the outrage most Americans feel about the trashing of our nation by illegal aliens and the government officials and companies that help them do it.
Friday, February 09, 2007
Republican Lawmaker Calls for Resignations
Washington, DC (TLS). A Republican Congressman is now calling for the resignations of Department of Homeland Security officials who lied to Congress concerning its 'evidence,' or lack thereof, with regard to the Border Patrol debacle. U.S. Representative Dana Rohrabacher, R-CA, stated that resignations are in order for those within Homeland Security who claimed to have evidence that did not exist, resisted requests by Congress for documentation in the case, and then lied to Congress about that documentation.
The Inspector-General of the Department of Homeland Security, Richard L. Skinner, reported to a House subcommittee in September of 2006 that the Department had evidence that implicated the two Border Patrol agents in felonies.
However, when Skinner appeared before the Committee once again this week, he was questioned about that claim. Skinner stated to Rohrabacher, 'The person who told you that misinformed you.'
That person was Skinner himself. That incident of 'misinformation,' in plain English, means LIE. Thus, Skinner implicated himself in lying to Congress.
Today Rohrabacher called for Skinner's resignation. However, this problem goes far beyond Skinner. Ohers were most definitely involved in the hoax, including U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton, District Judge Kathleen Cardone who presided over the case, and a host of others within the Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Justice Department. A massive scheme of this magnitude, involving retrieving a convicted drug offender from Mexico and giving him immunity to testify against the agents, would have to involve persons in high levels of government. Sutton repeatedly lied about how the illegal alien came to his office. False testimony was secured from persons who were obviously threatened into silence about what they actually knew. The jury in the case never heard or saw critical evidence. And the Judge resisted any effort to release the men pending appeals. Instead, they were quickly whisked off to prison like hardened mass murderers to rot in jail for a dozen years. Most murderers are given lighter sentences.
Somebody, somewhere wanted these two agents out of the picture in a hurry.
The Liberty Sphere demands to know who and for what purpose. The public has a right to know.
We will go a step further than Representative Rohrabacher in calling for Skinner's resignation. Johnny Sutton and Kathleen Cardone should also step down. They should also face investigations for misconduct, possibly a felonious attempt to frame two innocent men.
These actions of corrupt government officials are too serious, too damaging to the credibility of the criminal justice system in America, that much more than a simple resignation is in order. It is a felony to wilfully and knowingly prosecute and convict innocent citizens. We have LOADS of evidence that government officials knew exactly what they were doing. If this is the case, then they should face jail time.
No one in this country is above the law. Not the President, not the U.S. Attorney, not the Judge, and nobody in the Department of Homeland Security. Lying to Congress is a crime as well. Those who did so must be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law to show to the citizens of this country that there is still a tiny bit of integrity left in the criminal justice system. Anything less will send an ominous signal with far-reaching consequences that bode ill for this Republic.
Read more about calls for resignations here:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54142
The Inspector-General of the Department of Homeland Security, Richard L. Skinner, reported to a House subcommittee in September of 2006 that the Department had evidence that implicated the two Border Patrol agents in felonies.
However, when Skinner appeared before the Committee once again this week, he was questioned about that claim. Skinner stated to Rohrabacher, 'The person who told you that misinformed you.'
That person was Skinner himself. That incident of 'misinformation,' in plain English, means LIE. Thus, Skinner implicated himself in lying to Congress.
Today Rohrabacher called for Skinner's resignation. However, this problem goes far beyond Skinner. Ohers were most definitely involved in the hoax, including U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton, District Judge Kathleen Cardone who presided over the case, and a host of others within the Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Justice Department. A massive scheme of this magnitude, involving retrieving a convicted drug offender from Mexico and giving him immunity to testify against the agents, would have to involve persons in high levels of government. Sutton repeatedly lied about how the illegal alien came to his office. False testimony was secured from persons who were obviously threatened into silence about what they actually knew. The jury in the case never heard or saw critical evidence. And the Judge resisted any effort to release the men pending appeals. Instead, they were quickly whisked off to prison like hardened mass murderers to rot in jail for a dozen years. Most murderers are given lighter sentences.
Somebody, somewhere wanted these two agents out of the picture in a hurry.
The Liberty Sphere demands to know who and for what purpose. The public has a right to know.
We will go a step further than Representative Rohrabacher in calling for Skinner's resignation. Johnny Sutton and Kathleen Cardone should also step down. They should also face investigations for misconduct, possibly a felonious attempt to frame two innocent men.
These actions of corrupt government officials are too serious, too damaging to the credibility of the criminal justice system in America, that much more than a simple resignation is in order. It is a felony to wilfully and knowingly prosecute and convict innocent citizens. We have LOADS of evidence that government officials knew exactly what they were doing. If this is the case, then they should face jail time.
No one in this country is above the law. Not the President, not the U.S. Attorney, not the Judge, and nobody in the Department of Homeland Security. Lying to Congress is a crime as well. Those who did so must be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law to show to the citizens of this country that there is still a tiny bit of integrity left in the criminal justice system. Anything less will send an ominous signal with far-reaching consequences that bode ill for this Republic.
Read more about calls for resignations here:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54142
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)