Texas Fred just posted a MUST-read concerning the murder of Tiller the Baby Killer. Never one to mince words, Fred lays it on the line about the late-term abortion doctor who slaughtered 60,000 in his career.
Tiller was one of only THREE abortion doctors in the entire United States who perform these types of late-term procedures. THREE.
There is a reason for that. Doctors won't do them, not even the most rabid of pro-abortion physicians.
Be sure to read Texas Fred's report and commentary.
Showing posts with label partial-birth abortion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label partial-birth abortion. Show all posts
Tuesday, June 02, 2009
Monday, June 01, 2009
The Murder of Tiller the Baby Killer
The infamous abortion doctor in Kansas, 'Tiller the Baby Killer,' was murdered in cold blood at his church on Sunday.
Let me be perfectly clear about this display of deadly violence. It is to be harshly condemned.
How can a human being who is so concerned about the sanctity of human life turn around and do the very thing he/she is accusing the abortion doctors of doing?
This is nothing more than an example of twisted thinking on the part of such perpetrators. And pro-life citizens should be quick to disavow such acts. The murderer who took Tiller's life in no way represents the pro-life movement. As with all movements and institutions, the crazies make up a small percentage of those who belong to them.
Barack Obama stated he was 'outraged' at Tiller's murder. So am I. But what I want to hear from Obama is that he is just as outraged by the barbaric slaughter of innocent unborn babies
Let me be perfectly clear about this display of deadly violence. It is to be harshly condemned.
How can a human being who is so concerned about the sanctity of human life turn around and do the very thing he/she is accusing the abortion doctors of doing?
This is nothing more than an example of twisted thinking on the part of such perpetrators. And pro-life citizens should be quick to disavow such acts. The murderer who took Tiller's life in no way represents the pro-life movement. As with all movements and institutions, the crazies make up a small percentage of those who belong to them.
Barack Obama stated he was 'outraged' at Tiller's murder. So am I. But what I want to hear from Obama is that he is just as outraged by the barbaric slaughter of innocent unborn babies
Thursday, April 19, 2007
Dems Condemn Supreme Court Ban of Barbarism
Washington, DC (TLS). In a stunning victory for pro-life forces, the United States Supreme Court yesterday banned a procedure that critics have long designated as an unnecessary, gruesome, and barbaric attack against unborn children.
The high court banned the procedure known as 'partial birth abortions,' a late-term procedure during which the child is partially delivered, killed by drilling a hole in its head and sucking out the brain, and then delivering the rest of the child dead.
Republican Presidential candidates praised the decision of the Court.
Democrats, on the other hand, condemned it.
U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein, D-California, took to the floor of the Senate to deliver a lengthy diatribe against the court's decision, claiming that it took away all the progress toward 'women's rights' that we have made over the past 30 years.
Excuse me, Senator, but how does a ban on barbarism set back human rights? In addition, you should be under arrest at this very moment in order to face charges of war profiteering--a scheme during which you sent to your husband's companies millions of dollars' worth of military construction contracts while you were the Chair of the very committee that approved those contracts.
Hillary Clinton, as expected, condemned the decision, as did Barack Hussein Obama. No surprises there.
John Edwards, however, issued a most stinging rebuke, stated that he 'could not disagree more strongly' with the decision.
In that one single statement alone, Edwards betrayed his upbringing and the values of his home state of South Carolina. As a native of Seneca, which is located in the upstate of S.C. where people value faith, freedom, the rule of law, and traditional family values, Edwards demonstrated today he has little regard for those values.
Let the record show for all to see that every single Democratic candidate for President is on the record for supporting one of the most blood-thirsty, gruesome, chilling, and barbaric procedures ever devised in the demented minds of abortion doctors.
The high court banned the procedure known as 'partial birth abortions,' a late-term procedure during which the child is partially delivered, killed by drilling a hole in its head and sucking out the brain, and then delivering the rest of the child dead.
Republican Presidential candidates praised the decision of the Court.
Democrats, on the other hand, condemned it.
U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein, D-California, took to the floor of the Senate to deliver a lengthy diatribe against the court's decision, claiming that it took away all the progress toward 'women's rights' that we have made over the past 30 years.
Excuse me, Senator, but how does a ban on barbarism set back human rights? In addition, you should be under arrest at this very moment in order to face charges of war profiteering--a scheme during which you sent to your husband's companies millions of dollars' worth of military construction contracts while you were the Chair of the very committee that approved those contracts.
Hillary Clinton, as expected, condemned the decision, as did Barack Hussein Obama. No surprises there.
John Edwards, however, issued a most stinging rebuke, stated that he 'could not disagree more strongly' with the decision.
In that one single statement alone, Edwards betrayed his upbringing and the values of his home state of South Carolina. As a native of Seneca, which is located in the upstate of S.C. where people value faith, freedom, the rule of law, and traditional family values, Edwards demonstrated today he has little regard for those values.
Let the record show for all to see that every single Democratic candidate for President is on the record for supporting one of the most blood-thirsty, gruesome, chilling, and barbaric procedures ever devised in the demented minds of abortion doctors.
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
SUPREME COURT BANS PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTIONS
Washington, DC (TLS). In a decision that clearly signals the fact that Roe v. Wade is not a license for wide-open abortion-on-demand, the Supreme Court today issued a ruling that denotes a clear victory for pro-life forces around the country.
The barbaric and gruesome procedure known as 'partial birth abortion' has been banned.
This late-term procedure is used as a means of killing an infant by partial delivery. The abortion doctor delivers the infant's head only, leaving the rest of the body inside the mother. At this point a hole is drilled into the head of the infant, whereupon the brain is sucked out of the skull using a suction devise. Then, the rest of the baby is delivered dead.
Abortion foes have long insisted that this procedure is indicative of a culture of barbarism at its worst--an example of how inhuman the abortion industry can be.
And they were right.
Today, the Supreme Court agreed.
Pro-life forces hailed the decision today as a victory for humanity, for the unborn, and for basic human dignity. Republican Presidential candidates in one accord also hailed the decision, including Giuliani, McCain, and Romney.
Barack Hussein Obama, however, stated, 'I strongly disagree with the decision.'
This is not surprising. The Illinois Democrat and Presidential candidate has consistently voted for abortion on demand throughout his political career, including support for this most barbaric of procedures known as partial birth abortion.
While the other Democratic candidates have not yet opined on the decision, you can be assured that they too will express their displeasure. There is not a single pro-life candidate on the Democratic side.
Hillary in particular will be most displeased. During her husband's tenure in the White House, the Clintons vigorously opposed measures introduced by Republicans during the 90s to stop the practice of partial birth abortions.
As for today's ruling, those of us who value innocent human life can chalk one up for the precious unborn. The Supreme Court can be congratulated for introducing just a bit of sanity into the horrendous state of the nation's abortion industry.
The barbaric and gruesome procedure known as 'partial birth abortion' has been banned.
This late-term procedure is used as a means of killing an infant by partial delivery. The abortion doctor delivers the infant's head only, leaving the rest of the body inside the mother. At this point a hole is drilled into the head of the infant, whereupon the brain is sucked out of the skull using a suction devise. Then, the rest of the baby is delivered dead.
Abortion foes have long insisted that this procedure is indicative of a culture of barbarism at its worst--an example of how inhuman the abortion industry can be.
And they were right.
Today, the Supreme Court agreed.
Pro-life forces hailed the decision today as a victory for humanity, for the unborn, and for basic human dignity. Republican Presidential candidates in one accord also hailed the decision, including Giuliani, McCain, and Romney.
Barack Hussein Obama, however, stated, 'I strongly disagree with the decision.'
This is not surprising. The Illinois Democrat and Presidential candidate has consistently voted for abortion on demand throughout his political career, including support for this most barbaric of procedures known as partial birth abortion.
While the other Democratic candidates have not yet opined on the decision, you can be assured that they too will express their displeasure. There is not a single pro-life candidate on the Democratic side.
Hillary in particular will be most displeased. During her husband's tenure in the White House, the Clintons vigorously opposed measures introduced by Republicans during the 90s to stop the practice of partial birth abortions.
As for today's ruling, those of us who value innocent human life can chalk one up for the precious unborn. The Supreme Court can be congratulated for introducing just a bit of sanity into the horrendous state of the nation's abortion industry.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)