We have reported before that Obama supporters have been busing in people from out of state to the town hall meetings in order to give the appearance of local support for ObamaCare.
But this blogger has the goods on it, and it's too bad the national media hasn't blown the whistle on this sham.
Be sure to pass this one along to everyone you know.
Showing posts with label Unions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Unions. Show all posts
Sunday, August 30, 2009
Friday, March 06, 2009
Biden Says If You're Non-Union, You Can Forget It
Vice-President Joe Biden stated on Thursday that the U.S. economic stimulus plan devised by Barack Obama and the Democrats is aimed at 'protecting and boosting Union jobs.'
So now the truth comes out!
If you work for a small business, or you work in the South (where most jobs are non-Union), then you can forget it. The stimulus plan is not designed for you, according to Biden.
What a clown.
And this should be the absolute, final, indisputable proof that Obama and his entire administration is nothing but a bunch of clowns.
So now the truth comes out!
If you work for a small business, or you work in the South (where most jobs are non-Union), then you can forget it. The stimulus plan is not designed for you, according to Biden.
What a clown.
And this should be the absolute, final, indisputable proof that Obama and his entire administration is nothing but a bunch of clowns.
Friday, November 21, 2008
Dems to Nix the Right to Secret Ballot for Workers
With the assault on free speech and gun rights initiated by the election of Barack Obama and a greater Democratic majority in Congress, it is not surprising that the Dems wish to torpedo another basic cornerstone of our democracy--the secret ballot.
It has long been assumed that in free societies individuals have the freedom to choose their leaders and make their policy preferences known through the secret ballot--free from the coercion inherent in public votes.
But during the campaign Barack Obama stated that he is in favor of ending secret ballots for workers when they vote on whether or not to unionize.
His Democratic partners in crime agree, mainly due to the fact that the entire lot is in the hip-pocket of big labor unions. They have been bought and paid for by big labor.
And big labor wants to force workers to vote to unionize by shaming them into it through the use of a public vote.
The labor union movement in America is a story filled with corruption, coercion, threats, and even murder. Can you imagine the pressure on an ordinary worker who is against unionization but is forced to make his opinion known by a show of hands, particularly if most of his co-workers are in favor of it?
The thing that makes the Obama-Democrat plan even more galling is the fact that even the Dems in the House and Senate often use the secret ballot for votes, such as they did recently with the election of the Chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
But the Dems would deny that right to American workers when it comes to voting on whether or not to unionize.
This is just one more example of the hypocrisy of the Obama-Democrat assault on the rights of citizens. While keeping for themselves the right to a secret ballot, they would rob the citizens of that same right.
It has long been assumed that in free societies individuals have the freedom to choose their leaders and make their policy preferences known through the secret ballot--free from the coercion inherent in public votes.
But during the campaign Barack Obama stated that he is in favor of ending secret ballots for workers when they vote on whether or not to unionize.
His Democratic partners in crime agree, mainly due to the fact that the entire lot is in the hip-pocket of big labor unions. They have been bought and paid for by big labor.
And big labor wants to force workers to vote to unionize by shaming them into it through the use of a public vote.
The labor union movement in America is a story filled with corruption, coercion, threats, and even murder. Can you imagine the pressure on an ordinary worker who is against unionization but is forced to make his opinion known by a show of hands, particularly if most of his co-workers are in favor of it?
The thing that makes the Obama-Democrat plan even more galling is the fact that even the Dems in the House and Senate often use the secret ballot for votes, such as they did recently with the election of the Chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
But the Dems would deny that right to American workers when it comes to voting on whether or not to unionize.
This is just one more example of the hypocrisy of the Obama-Democrat assault on the rights of citizens. While keeping for themselves the right to a secret ballot, they would rob the citizens of that same right.
Thursday, November 08, 2007
The Four Rules of Capitalism
The little-known but all-important rules of Capitalism are as follows:
1. Motivated individuals create wealth by finding a need and filling it. This means you either make something that people want or need, or offer a service that they want or need.
Question Number One--what the hell is 'selfish' about that?
2. Wealth is not a limited commodity but a limitless opportunity to the truly motivated and the truly wise. Only those who believe that government creates wealth by printing paper money believe that wealth is a limited commodity with only so many pieces of the pie available, in spite of the ironic and contradictory fact that government goes on printing more and more money in a faux-wealth attempt to create the illusion that it is 'creating wealth.'
Question Number Two--instead of whining about the money those who create wealth make, why not encourage those who are stuck in dead-end jobs to rise to their potential, believe in themselves, and create more wealth, instead of preying on their class envy to shame the money-makers into giving up their wealth?
3. Once wealth is achieved, even more wealth is created by giving it away voluntarily to help others get started in creating their own wealth. John D. Rockefeller was a miserable billionaire until he stopped worrying, discovered faith, and began systematically giving away his wealth. He only found that he COULD not give it away at all. The more he gave, the more wealthy he became. As soon as he gave what he thought would surely break him, he only found his wealth to be multiplied at least tenfold or one hundred- fold afterward.
Question Number Three--instead of bleeding the wealthy dry with a punitive tax system that punishes the wealthy, why not instead encourage the systematic and voluntary giving away of wealth as a means of creating more wealth, and helping others help themselves in the process?
4. A good Capitalist knows that workers/employees only produce to the degree that they are positively motivated to do so from the top. The fair, positive, and motivational treatment of workers is the best defense against a unionized workforce.
Question Number Four--Since within a healthy, success-based Capitalism there is no such thing as an adversarial relationship between employer and employee, but only poor matchups between jobs and those who are either not skilled enough or motivated enough to successfully work those jobs, why not focus on the team approach rather than the adversarial approach inherent in the Management-Union square-off model?
Matching workers with jobs that utilize their own unique skills and aptitudes will make for a much more positive work environment and help to minimize the common conflicts that occur when the wrong person is working the wrong job. Taking a wrong person at a wrong job and placing him/her at the right job, makes that person the right person for the right job.
In addition, every good Capitalist knows that fairly compensated workers who are treated fairly and with respect make the best workers. By helping them, the Capitalist helps himself and his business. And when the workers help the company and management by helping to create wealth with quality work, workers gain the benefits of a sound, fiscally-solid company.
1. Motivated individuals create wealth by finding a need and filling it. This means you either make something that people want or need, or offer a service that they want or need.
Question Number One--what the hell is 'selfish' about that?
2. Wealth is not a limited commodity but a limitless opportunity to the truly motivated and the truly wise. Only those who believe that government creates wealth by printing paper money believe that wealth is a limited commodity with only so many pieces of the pie available, in spite of the ironic and contradictory fact that government goes on printing more and more money in a faux-wealth attempt to create the illusion that it is 'creating wealth.'
Question Number Two--instead of whining about the money those who create wealth make, why not encourage those who are stuck in dead-end jobs to rise to their potential, believe in themselves, and create more wealth, instead of preying on their class envy to shame the money-makers into giving up their wealth?
3. Once wealth is achieved, even more wealth is created by giving it away voluntarily to help others get started in creating their own wealth. John D. Rockefeller was a miserable billionaire until he stopped worrying, discovered faith, and began systematically giving away his wealth. He only found that he COULD not give it away at all. The more he gave, the more wealthy he became. As soon as he gave what he thought would surely break him, he only found his wealth to be multiplied at least tenfold or one hundred- fold afterward.
Question Number Three--instead of bleeding the wealthy dry with a punitive tax system that punishes the wealthy, why not instead encourage the systematic and voluntary giving away of wealth as a means of creating more wealth, and helping others help themselves in the process?
4. A good Capitalist knows that workers/employees only produce to the degree that they are positively motivated to do so from the top. The fair, positive, and motivational treatment of workers is the best defense against a unionized workforce.
Question Number Four--Since within a healthy, success-based Capitalism there is no such thing as an adversarial relationship between employer and employee, but only poor matchups between jobs and those who are either not skilled enough or motivated enough to successfully work those jobs, why not focus on the team approach rather than the adversarial approach inherent in the Management-Union square-off model?
Matching workers with jobs that utilize their own unique skills and aptitudes will make for a much more positive work environment and help to minimize the common conflicts that occur when the wrong person is working the wrong job. Taking a wrong person at a wrong job and placing him/her at the right job, makes that person the right person for the right job.
In addition, every good Capitalist knows that fairly compensated workers who are treated fairly and with respect make the best workers. By helping them, the Capitalist helps himself and his business. And when the workers help the company and management by helping to create wealth with quality work, workers gain the benefits of a sound, fiscally-solid company.
Labels:
capitalism,
class-envy,
creating wealth,
economics,
employees,
employers,
politics,
U.S. tax system,
Unions
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)