ALERT! LEFTWING HACKS SAY WE'RE A 'MOB'

Two major leftwing hacks, Maureen Dowd and Frank Rich, stated on Saturday that McCain and Palin have been out stirring up 'mob anger' toward Barack Obama.

Both Dowd and Rich are ultra-liberal columnists for the New York Times.

And both are entirely WRONG about McCain and Palin 'stirring up the mob.'

The two leftist columnists should know that average, everyday, God-fearing, hard-working, taypaying, responsible citizens in the heartland of this country are scared to death of Barack Obama and his extremism.

Their anger has been slowly rising the closer we get to Election Day due to the fact that they know the truth about Obama and are seething about the fact that this man may actually get elected to the Presidency, when he could not even get a security clearance for a government job due to his ties with persons of dangerous reputation.

Governor Sarah Palin is not to blame for Barack Obama's votes to kill infants who survive botched abortion attempts. Senator John McCain is not to blame for Obama's sleazy relationships with terrorists and thugs in the corrupt Chicago political machine.

No, Ms. Dowd and Mr. Rich, Barack Obama did those things all on his own. And now he must take responsibility for his actions and pay for them with being denied the White House at the very least. He may even need to go to jail, depending on what Tony Rezko tells the Feds about him.

Alerting the voters to the myriad of highly troubling problems surrounding Barack Obama is not stirring up a mob. It is telling the truth, which the mainstream media and columnists like Dowd and Rich are NOT doing.

Thus, in the eyes of Obama disciples and their mouthpieces in the mainstream media, I am now part of a 'mob' because I am angry that someone like Barack Obama could get this close to the White House. My fellow bloggers who oppose Obama tooth and nail are now considered part of a 'mob.' Gun owners who cherish their God-given and Constitutionally-protected right to bear arms are now part of a 'mob' because they are livid that a man who stated publicly that all handguns should be banned in America is on his way to becoming President, if we believe some of the polls.

And last but certainly not least, those who are outraged that a man who voted 3 times to disallow medical care for infants that survive botched abortion attempts is within a hare's breath of being elected are now referred to as 'a mob mentality.'

No, Ms. Dowd and Mr. Rich, these are the best and brightest among us.

And thus, if the outrage the ordinary citizens in the heartland feel toward Barack Obama makes us a 'mob,' then I will gladly take my spot as part of it. We are angry that the media of which you are a part has thrown its hat into the ring for Obama, openly campaigning for him when it is supposed to be neutral.

And we are mortified over the prospects of an outright Socialist being elected as President of the United States of America.

I supposed Dowd and Rich in their almighty wisdom would refer to Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, Henry, and John Jay as 'a mob' because they were livid over British rule and actually defied authority on behalf of liberty.

Yes, I am proud to be associated with such mobs. And if getting angry about what is about to happen to this country is what it takes to save it from socialist tyranny, then so be it.

Signed,
A Proud Member of the Angry Mob Against Obama

Dowd, Quinn Gang Up on Sarah Palin Today

The attack dogs of the far-Left in the mainstream media plan a coordinated attack-blitz on GOP Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin today in the New York Times and the Washington Post.

Both newspapers plan to put their premier Leftist women, Maureen Dowd and Sally Quinn, at the forefront of the attack, delivering what they hope to be a one-two knockout punch on the Alaska Governor.

Dowd and Quinn will claim that Palin isn't qualified to be President, in spite of the fact that the head of the Democratic ticket is an untested rookie who is more mouth than anything else. They plan to attack her conservative politics. They even plan to attack her religion.

You see, liberal elitists such as Dowd and Quinn look askance at anyone who is not only deeply religious but who belongs to a denomination that is conservative and evangelical. This is why in their view Barack Obama is okay. He belongs to one of the most extremist liberal denominations in the world, the United Church of Christ, which endorses liberal politics nearly 100% of the time.

Palin, on the other hand, is Assemblies of God, a conservative, evangelical group that tends to be suspicious of liberal politics and its adherents in leftwing 'Christian' denominations, where one hears more about liberal community activism than Jesus Christ.

Dowd and Quinn hope that their vitriol against Palin will rally the feminist troops out and about, turning them against the very first woman who actually has a good chance of being elected to the 2nd highest office in the land.

However, look for the Dowd-Quinn smear campaign to backfire in the faces of Democrats. Millions of women in the heartland of American detest the views of Dowd and Quinn, that is, if they have ever read them. Most probably have not even heard of the two extremists, and even if they have, they are not inclined to give proponents of abortion-on-demand and big government nanny-state programs the time of day.

Dowd and Quinn totally misread the mindset of most women in this country. Sure, radical feminists will agree with them. But most American women are anything but adherents to the Dowd-Quinn school of Leftist thought.

And when they see these two mount a concerted effort to destroy a very popular woman with whom they can connect at a very deep emotional level, they will turn against not only the two writers, but the New York Times and the Washington Post, as well as the extremists within the Democratic Party who seem to support only those women who espouse ultra-liberal ideas.

Stupid, Idiotic, Clueless Yankee Woman

Other than being a very attractive woman, there is practically no redeeming value to the patent drivel of neo-Commie New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd.

She is an airhead. Her columns are sophomoric, detached from reality, lacking in insight, and basically nothing but anti-conservative diatribes.

I find her to be beneath contempt.

The fact that the New York Times publishes this totally irrational balderdash is only more proof that the newspaper is no longer a newspaper but a tabloid. Someone should go ahead and put it out of its misery before it becomes just another rag one finds in the racks along the checkout lines at grocery stores.

Dowd has made a career out of inadvertently drawing into clear focus what most Americans have known all along anyway--liberals are dangerous to America, lacking in any true adherence to the principles of the Founding Fathers and their legacy--the Constitution and the Bill of Rights--and so extremist that the mainstream citizens in the heartland fear for what would become of our nation if people of Dowd's ilk ever become the ruling majority in Washington.

A very impressive blog I have been reading of late, The Stiletto, has singled out Dowd for the latest of her less-than-stellar articles, in which she claims she was 'just a child' when she first encountered the Mormon Temple outside Washington on the Beltway.

As expected, the article is a set-up for a Romney-bash, using his religion to engage in a bit of liberal-approved religious bigotry. But of course, if the liberals do it, then it's not bigotry.

However, as the Stiletto points out, someone noticed a major discrepancy in Dowd's chronology of events in her life. The Mormon Temple to which she refers was completed in 1974. The problem is that Dowd was born in 1952, making her at least 21 years of age when she claims she used to pass by that edifice 'as a kid.'

In short, Dowd effectively shaved off 15 years from her age in this article.

So, the question becomes, how does a political columnist maintain any credibility when going after certain discrepancies on the part of Presidential candidates when the columnist herself is so willing to misrepresent her own life?

Read the full story here, at The Stiletto: http://thestilettoblog.com/2007/12/14/not-the-sharpest-knife-in-the-drawer-maureen-dowds-extended-childhood.aspx#Comment