Focusing on guns, politics, and news of interest, here is today's Second Amendment News Roundup:
CNS News reports that an elections supervisor in Nevada stated that ACORN delivered 'thousands and thousands' of fraudulent voter registration forms. As I have repeatedly stated, folks, if Obama wins, that means ACORN stole the election.
National Review has scoped out yet another Communist in Obama's infamous circle of friends and associates.
Anyone ever heard of the 'Media Bloggers Association?' This guy, Ron Coleman (h/t to Glenn Reynolds), claims that joining will give us some protection from the coming gag order on the Internet-blogosphere by Obama and his goon squad in Congress. But since I am not a member, I don't know. Does anyone have info?
Glenn Reynolds posts a follow-up to an ACORN worker convicted of voter fraud. And he has another story of an arrest of an ACORN worker for voter fraud in Pennsylvania HERE.
From David Codrea's War on Guns:
*David's new column is published in the Cleveland Gun Rights Examiner. Support it!
*'The Trouble With Freedom'--'not enough government power.' ROFL!!
*'Can You Imagine Getting Arrested in Your Own Home?' Think Germany--1930s, Poland--1939, the Netherlands--late 30s and early 40s, and every other country in Eastern Europe that had been free.
By the way, here is the link to main page of the Cleveland Gun Rights Examiner, in which David Codrea now has a regular column on gun rights.
Nicki did us all a great favor in posting commentary on the conference call with Missouri Governor Matt Blunt, in which David Codrea participated. Take a look for a critique of what's going on in Missouri with regard to gun rights.
Mindful Musings has Vanderboegh's latest response to the insults the Left has delivered to American Spectator for referring to Obama, Pelosi, and Reid as 'the unholy triumvirate.' Well, I call them the 'evil triumvirate.' Same difference, a little more oomph.
Western Rifle Shooters Association posts Vanderboegh's 'Praxis # I.' A MUST-read!
Armed and Safe responds to a misguided soul who says the response to tyranny should be to just sit there and take it.
JR posts the political cartoon of the day, entitled, 'Tricks and Treats.' A MUST-see!
Alphecca has an excellent read on the lack of fact-finding and truth-telling on the part of the mainstream media. Journalistic ethics and honesty are down the drain, folks.
Syd at Front Sight, Press muses about possible signs of hope for concealed carry in New Jersey.
Robb Allen asks 'As a Gun Owner, Who Would Get Your Vote?'
Sebastian reports explosive news that Democrats in Congress wish to abolish 401K contributions and put them into the federal government instead. Hope and change we ALL can believe it, right?
Catching up with Squeaky Wheel. Squeaks has been keeping a rather low profile of late, but I thought I would point readers to her blog so we can catch up on what's been happening with her lately.
Michelle Malkin has another example of flat-out dishonest news reporting on Sarah Palin!
An Ol' Broad's Ramblings posts today's edition of 'Obamarama.' Hilarious!
Days of Our Trailers speculates that there may be cheaper ammo coming.
Texas Fred shows us the video that proves Barack Obama is an unqualified, barefaced, dishonest, despicable liar of the worst sort. I'm serious. Take a look!
The Bobo Files publishes something on Colin Powell that you absolutely must see. Read it all!
Showing posts with label the evil triumvirate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the evil triumvirate. Show all posts
Thursday, October 23, 2008
SENIOR DEM ADMITS TRUTH ON 'FAIRNESS DOCTRINE'
If one senior Democratic Senator has his way, conservative radio stations will be forced to provide 'dissenting points of view' for any statement issued on Rush Limbaugh's show or any number of other conservative radio talk shows.
The one thing missing from the Senator's comment, however, is the requirement that LEFTWING media organizations, such as CNN, CBS, NBC, ABC, and Air America give equal time to conservative points of view.
But then, that would only be fair. We can't have that, can we, Senator...
And this is precisely why the so-called 'Fairness Doctrine' is a sham and is anything BUT fair.
Democratic Senator Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico told a conservative talk radio station that if he had his way, he would impose the doctrine on the station, forcing them to provide 'the other point of view,' but without imposing the same standard on liberal outlets.
Imagine the nightmare if you are a station programming director. You have top-rated programs that bring in top revenue, such as Rush Limbaugh, Laura Ingram, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, and others.
Yet some Leftist government thug forces you to provide 'equal time' whenever a liberal nutcase has a problem with a statement made by such radio hosts.
Such a logistical nightmare will result in programming directors throwing up their hands, pulling the programs off the air, and playing Latin music all morning and afternoon.
This is exactly what will happen to our most popular talk radio shows across the nation if Americans elect the 'evil triumvirate' to run the country--Obama in the White House, Dingy Harry Reid in the Senate, and Commie Nan Pelosi in the House.
The one thing missing from the Senator's comment, however, is the requirement that LEFTWING media organizations, such as CNN, CBS, NBC, ABC, and Air America give equal time to conservative points of view.
But then, that would only be fair. We can't have that, can we, Senator...
And this is precisely why the so-called 'Fairness Doctrine' is a sham and is anything BUT fair.
Democratic Senator Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico told a conservative talk radio station that if he had his way, he would impose the doctrine on the station, forcing them to provide 'the other point of view,' but without imposing the same standard on liberal outlets.
Imagine the nightmare if you are a station programming director. You have top-rated programs that bring in top revenue, such as Rush Limbaugh, Laura Ingram, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, and others.
Yet some Leftist government thug forces you to provide 'equal time' whenever a liberal nutcase has a problem with a statement made by such radio hosts.
Such a logistical nightmare will result in programming directors throwing up their hands, pulling the programs off the air, and playing Latin music all morning and afternoon.
This is exactly what will happen to our most popular talk radio shows across the nation if Americans elect the 'evil triumvirate' to run the country--Obama in the White House, Dingy Harry Reid in the Senate, and Commie Nan Pelosi in the House.
Sunday, October 19, 2008
The Evil Triumvirate
Americans claim they want 'change' in November.
Americans also claim that the present U.S. Congress, which is headed by Democrats in both the Senate and the House, is the most unpopular in American history, with an approval rating of only 9%--20 percentage points lower than George W. Bush.
Yet Americans apparently are not only going to elect the most radical, Leftwing extremist Presidential candidate in U.S. history to the White House, but they are going to increase liberal Democratic majorities in both houses of a Congress that receives their overwhelming opposition and condemnation.
The stark inconsistency of such a position is astounding.
If we can believe the polls, Americans will wake up from their stupor with a hangover on the day after the Election and wonder what on earth they have done.
For there, lying beside them in bed will be the 'evil triumvirate' that they have just given the power to rule the country unchallenged--Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Barack Obama.
These 3 will have enormous veto-proof power to do essentially anything they want no matter what the opposition--or average Americans--say.
Harry Reid is described by even members of his own Party as by far the most partisan obstructionist Senate Majority Leader the Democrats have ever had.
Nancy Pelosi's San Francisco style politics rubs multi-millions of Americans the wrong way. She has faced enormous opposition from more moderate-to-conservative Democrats in the House.
And Barack Obama is an outright Socialist, once a member of the Communist Party in Chicago.
The 3 will join forces to steamroll the Congress to enact the most sweeping leftwing, anti-Constitutional legislation in the history of the Republic.
Americans as recently as the 2006 midterm elections clearly expressed an aversion to monopolistic rule on the part of one Party in Washington.
Citizens clearly prefer a divided government so that a prudent system of checks and balances can be put into place that provides at least some roadblocks to complete domination by one group.
Yet we are led to believe by polling data that Americans are getting ready to do the exact things they claim to detest--granting unbridled power for one political Party that has presided over the most unpopular Congress in U.S. history, along with electing to the White House yet another Socialist in the tradition of Pelosi and Reid to help them continue with policies the citizens deplore.
How's that for logic?
I have trouble believing this is the 'change' most Americans are bargaining for. And I would be willing to wager it won't take long for Americans to sorely regret their decision.
Americans also claim that the present U.S. Congress, which is headed by Democrats in both the Senate and the House, is the most unpopular in American history, with an approval rating of only 9%--20 percentage points lower than George W. Bush.
Yet Americans apparently are not only going to elect the most radical, Leftwing extremist Presidential candidate in U.S. history to the White House, but they are going to increase liberal Democratic majorities in both houses of a Congress that receives their overwhelming opposition and condemnation.
The stark inconsistency of such a position is astounding.
If we can believe the polls, Americans will wake up from their stupor with a hangover on the day after the Election and wonder what on earth they have done.
For there, lying beside them in bed will be the 'evil triumvirate' that they have just given the power to rule the country unchallenged--Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Barack Obama.
These 3 will have enormous veto-proof power to do essentially anything they want no matter what the opposition--or average Americans--say.
Harry Reid is described by even members of his own Party as by far the most partisan obstructionist Senate Majority Leader the Democrats have ever had.
Nancy Pelosi's San Francisco style politics rubs multi-millions of Americans the wrong way. She has faced enormous opposition from more moderate-to-conservative Democrats in the House.
And Barack Obama is an outright Socialist, once a member of the Communist Party in Chicago.
The 3 will join forces to steamroll the Congress to enact the most sweeping leftwing, anti-Constitutional legislation in the history of the Republic.
Americans as recently as the 2006 midterm elections clearly expressed an aversion to monopolistic rule on the part of one Party in Washington.
Citizens clearly prefer a divided government so that a prudent system of checks and balances can be put into place that provides at least some roadblocks to complete domination by one group.
Yet we are led to believe by polling data that Americans are getting ready to do the exact things they claim to detest--granting unbridled power for one political Party that has presided over the most unpopular Congress in U.S. history, along with electing to the White House yet another Socialist in the tradition of Pelosi and Reid to help them continue with policies the citizens deplore.
How's that for logic?
I have trouble believing this is the 'change' most Americans are bargaining for. And I would be willing to wager it won't take long for Americans to sorely regret their decision.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)