I have some pretty strong, salty language for vermin in politics who say one thing and do another, but I think I'll pass this time and defer to Brigid at Home on the Range, who puts it in a much more civil fashion.
She hits the nail on the head.
You cannot be honest about supporting the 2nd Amendment if you vote for such bans. This is like supporters of Mitt Romney claiming he supports gun rights but with so-called 'reasonable restrictions and controls.'
Do what? What is it about 'inalienable right' that Romneyites can't seem to grasp?