Washington, DC (TLS). The news out of Washington today is that the Bush Administration is increasingly concerned about China's long-range missile capability. And well they should be.
For years China has been quietly but steadily building its military, munitions and weapons arsenals, including the capability of launching nuclear missiles that can hit the U.S. mainland.
While the Chinese have been busy building up their capability of waging nuclear war against America, we Americans have largely ignored such ominous clouds on the horizon in lieu of establishing corporate and business liaisons with the Communist giant, not only to pad our pockets but to supposedly weaken the totalitarian resolve of the Chinese by expanding capitalistic ventures within their borders.
The problem is that under the present unfair trade practices in the name of 'free trade,' the Chinese have made billions at the expense of Americans--billions that have then been used to continue expanding their military and nuclear capability.
In short, the Chinese have been using our willingness to engage in capitalistic ventures with them against us.
The result is that China is on the brink of becoming a true, bona fide super-power in every sense of the word, not just militarily but economically.
Thus far, the only thing keeping China from dominating the world stage as a super-power has been its lack of economic progress under the stifling effects of Communism. That has changed drastically. And they have done it by being willing to adopt a limited capitalistic economic model while steadfastly maintaining their Communist totalitarian philosophy.
Thus, Google can do business and flourish as a capitalistic venture in China, but they must keep the Chinese population in the dark about certain strains of political thought that could incite the citizenry to an uprising similar to the Tienanmen Square display.
The ominous result of this course of events is that the capitalism that China allows to flourish within its borders is then used to bolster and strengthen its basic governmental philosophy that the general population cannot be trusted and that the liberties of the people must continue to be restricted.
Not only that, but the bounty produced by the capitalistic model is used to continue to build itself into the largest and most dangerous totalitarian army in the world.
Although China has seen the light that only capitalism can produce wealth and prosperity, it has failed to embrace the underlying principles of liberty from which capitalism draws most of its vitality.
The result, unfortunately, is a significantly strengthened--and dangerous--super-power.
In dealing with China we cannot for one moment forget that they are still Communists. And with their growing military power, we must always keep the suspicious eye on them, regardless of our business connections with them.
For years China has been quietly but steadily building its military, munitions and weapons arsenals, including the capability of launching nuclear missiles that can hit the U.S. mainland.
While the Chinese have been busy building up their capability of waging nuclear war against America, we Americans have largely ignored such ominous clouds on the horizon in lieu of establishing corporate and business liaisons with the Communist giant, not only to pad our pockets but to supposedly weaken the totalitarian resolve of the Chinese by expanding capitalistic ventures within their borders.
The problem is that under the present unfair trade practices in the name of 'free trade,' the Chinese have made billions at the expense of Americans--billions that have then been used to continue expanding their military and nuclear capability.
In short, the Chinese have been using our willingness to engage in capitalistic ventures with them against us.
The result is that China is on the brink of becoming a true, bona fide super-power in every sense of the word, not just militarily but economically.
Thus far, the only thing keeping China from dominating the world stage as a super-power has been its lack of economic progress under the stifling effects of Communism. That has changed drastically. And they have done it by being willing to adopt a limited capitalistic economic model while steadfastly maintaining their Communist totalitarian philosophy.
Thus, Google can do business and flourish as a capitalistic venture in China, but they must keep the Chinese population in the dark about certain strains of political thought that could incite the citizenry to an uprising similar to the Tienanmen Square display.
The ominous result of this course of events is that the capitalism that China allows to flourish within its borders is then used to bolster and strengthen its basic governmental philosophy that the general population cannot be trusted and that the liberties of the people must continue to be restricted.
Not only that, but the bounty produced by the capitalistic model is used to continue to build itself into the largest and most dangerous totalitarian army in the world.
Although China has seen the light that only capitalism can produce wealth and prosperity, it has failed to embrace the underlying principles of liberty from which capitalism draws most of its vitality.
The result, unfortunately, is a significantly strengthened--and dangerous--super-power.
In dealing with China we cannot for one moment forget that they are still Communists. And with their growing military power, we must always keep the suspicious eye on them, regardless of our business connections with them.
2 comments:
interesting. when china was under strict communist rule, many westerners argued that the regime was a danger to the world. therefore, it must be brought down. now with 'limited capitalism,' china is somewhat prosperous, albeit its economy is still just under one tenth of that of the united states, people like you argue that it's time to limit china by bringing it back to the good old communist rule. you showed no principle in your back and forth argument. you do not care if the chinese people are free or not. all it matters is that united state must dominate the world. only so, the world is safe. i suggested you study a bit more about the world history. your current thought was shared by the british imperialists 200 or 300 years ago.
I think you are leaping to some conclusions that are not suggested in my article. Nowhere did I suggest that China return to strict Communist rule or to abandon their advancements under capitalism.
The purpose for my article was two-fold--one, to sound the alarm about the continued buildup of China's nuclear arsenal, and two, to correct unfair trade practices between the U.S. and China, which benefit China and hurt the U.S.
I believe in trade, progress, and expansion of liberty...but trade must be FAIR. So far, trade has been unfair, giving the Chinese the unfair advantage by which they are building up a nuclear arsenal to use against us.
That simply makes no sense.
Martyn
Post a Comment