Washington, DC (TLS). Senator Barack Hussein Obama, D-Ill., has become one of the stars of the Democrat Party and the darling of the mainstream news media. As his popularity has grown, fueled by the media frenzy that feeds off of Hollywood-type figures like a drug addict on cocaine, Obama has announced the formation of an exploratory committee to seek the 2008 Democrat Presidential nomination.
Polls show that Obama's popularity has surged to the point that Hillary Clinton's bid for the nomination has taken a nose-dive among the Party faithful.
It is clear, therefore, that the Democrat Party faithful find Obama to be an attractive candidate and a person whose views they can fully embrace.
And this brings us to the problem. We all knew this moment would come. The only question was when.
Explosive information has surfaced on Barack Hussein Obama that should make it crystal clear that the candidate is entirely outside the American mainstream, so much so that his views can be considered 'radical.' And this speaks volumes about the throngs of Democrats who wish to see this man in the White House.
Take these verified facts from the record of Obama's eight years in the Illinois state legislature:
*He voted against allowing citizens to use banned handguns to defend themselves against intruders in their homes.
*He supported allowing retired police officers to carry concealed weapons but denied that right to average citizens.
*He supports abortion on demand, receiving a 100% approval rating from Panned Parenthood.
And the most damning of all, Obama voted against requiring medical care for aborted babies who survive.
In short, this amounts to infanticide. Obama would not allow medical personnel to provide medical care for babies who survive abortion attempts. This refusal to help the helpless makes Barack Hussein Obama one of the most despicable and dangerous men in America.
Yet this is the man who would be President--a man the mainstream media loves, and a man that the Democrats are chomping at the bits to place in the White House.
Perhaps to the faithful within the Democrat Party infanticide is no big deal. Hopefully it is still a big deal to 99% of Americans. Only the most monstrous and barbaric among us would even think about supporting measures to withhold medical care from babies who survive the attempts of misguided, corrupt mothers and medical personnel to kill them.
Friday, January 19, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Shouldnt you be more concerned about the ecosystem and warfare before you start a debate about simple gun usage and abortion?
No. In the United States of America, human rights are never subservient to any other issue, period.
You say "abortion" as if it is that simple. We're not talking about an abortion in the first or second trimester. No- like most Americans, you're ignorant to what happened in Chicago.
A mother, almost seven months pregnant received an abortion. The infant survived the abortion attempt, and instead of placing the obviously premature infant on a respirator, the Doctor ordered the baby be discarded in a linen closet. A nurse obeyed, but later retrieved the baby. The Doctor discovered the nurse's insubordination and demanded the baby discarded once and for all. This is the event that encouraged this Illinois Senate vote. All the other Illinois Senators voted to allow an infant, under these circumstances, the right to live. Obama did not. Why? I don't know, maybe because he cares to much about your rights, or civil liberties. I think he was just trying to set himself apart, make a name and image for himself among the radicals.
Post a Comment