Mrs. Clinton--Bill's wife--is losing her personal identity. She is sending husband Bill out to defend her debacle on healthcare in 1993, stating that it was 'my fault and not hers' for the failure, despite the fact that Mrs. Clinton has been going around the country bragging about her 'work on national healthcare.'
Not only that, but Mrs. Clinton--Bill's wife--has been caught red-handed planting questioners during her supposed 'impromptu' question-and-answer sessions during her townhall meetings around the country.
One female college student in particular has described the trick in detail, stating that a Mrs. Clinton operative approached her about asking the candidate a question. When the student stated what she wanted to ask, the operative disapproved and presented her with a list of possible 'acceptable questions,' several specifically set up for college students to ask.
In short, Hillary is only getting questions she wants to answer, as we have seen with countless newspapers, radio programs, and now, with her threatening Wolf Blitzer and CNN over the upcoming Democratic debate on Thursday night.
Clearly Mrs. Clinton--Bill's wife--has trouble answering the tough questions as she demonstrated in the last Democratic debate when Tim Russert pressed her on drivers' licenses for illegal aliens and several other issues on which the candidate has waffled.
This woman has at least a 50-50 chance of becoming the next President of the most powerful nation on earth, and she has trouble handling tough questions?
As President, would she, for example, present the ominous Vladmir Putin a list of only 'acceptable' topics for conversation? Would she send Bill out to run interference with Hugo Chavez? How would she deal with the Iranian President and his tough-guy and dangerous rhetoric?
And she thinks Tim Russert and the 'boys' (her Democratic rivals) are 'ganging up on her'?
A world leader she is not.
In addition, several new polls released in the past 24 hours, two of which are by Zogby and Rasmussen, show that only 25% of respondents say they believe Hillary has been 'ganged up on' and treated unfairly by her Democratic rivals and Tim Russert, despite the whines of Mrs. Clinton and husband Bill.
These are only the least of her worries, however.
Since the last Democratic debate her lead over Barack Obama has been cut in half. She is in a statistical dead-heat with Obama in Iowa, and her lead over him in New Hampshire has been in a free fall.
And then there are the scandals that hang over her head like the Sword of Damocles.
Do these mounting woes indicate that Mrs. Clinton--Bill's wife--may be denied the Democratic nomination? Absolutely not. Her nomination is practically a foregone conclusion.
But she will most definitely be a scarred and greatly weakened candidate.
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
God how I pray she does not get the nomination...
Oh, she will get it, alright...she may come out bruised and slashed, but she WILL get the nomination. Mark it down.
hey Marty go check out the link on my page under the cartoon of Hillary clinton...its so funny!!
If she gets the nomination instead of Edwards I'm voting for Ron Paul...
Yeah, I checked it out and liked it. I linked to it in my 'Second Amendment News Roundup' section.
I still don't understand your thinking about John Edwards. He is as liberal as Hillary or Obama.
I like the fact that you could vote for Ron Paul, but how on earth is that compatible with voting for John Edwards?????
why not?
John Edwards is a Socialist, meaning he believes big government to be the answer to all problems and that government programs are to be preferred over the private sector.
Ron Paul is a Libertarian-Republican, meaning he believes in the Jeffersonian principle of small government, low taxes, the private sector taking the lead in all matters, and citizens being free from the shackles imposed by oppressive big government.
That is a huge difference.
I kills me that Paul is a Republican...damn it...
It serves you right...
Post a Comment