The Democratic candidates debated in Las Vegas Thursday evening before a highly partisan crowd, despite Wolf Blitzer's assertion that they were 'undecided voters.' These 'undecided' voters were all Bush-bashers and overtly anti-Republican.
It was obvious in their responses to the answers by the candidates and in the questions they posed to the them.
The CNN production was fairly poor. The Democrats were introduced to the stage individually, to great applause, much as baseball players in the World Series are individually introduced to the ball field to take their place standing along the first and third baselines.
The display was positively tacky.
In response to suggestions that CNN and its moderators had been 'warned' by the Clinton campaign to go easy on the candidate, Wolf and his pack wasted no time in attempting to appear bold in the face of the threat.
They went directly after Mrs. Clinton on the flip-flopping.
The ensuing scuffle between Mrs. Clinton, Edwards, and Obama was the stuff of dramatic TV--a mild form of Jerry Springer. Mrs. Clinton responded by saying that the words of Edwards in particular were 'mud-slinging.'
Clearly they were not.
Edwards merely held up for public viewing the statements of Mrs. Clinton, particularly on her many contradictions, often within the same sentence.
Once the three finished with their tangle, the debate continued on a variety of issues, most of which showed that each one of the Democratic candidates are avowed Socialists, and big tax-and-spend liberals who believe government is the best and final solution to all problems.
The following is a run-down of my impressions of each candidate, based upon the Thursday night debate.
Mrs. Clinton--definitely a flip-flopper, contradictory, subject to change with the wind, a big government Socialist who is trying very hard to run from her votes in the Senate in support of the Iraq War, funding for the Iraq War, open borders, amnesty for illegal aliens, free health care and tuition credits for illegal aliens, driver's licenses for illegal aliens (despite her claim during the debate that she is opposed to it...I suppose it is one of those infamous Kerry-inspired cases of 'I was for it before I was against it'), and GOVERNMENT MANDATED healthcare for everyone in America.
B. Hussein Obama--a clown. He once taught law. This is one of the things that's wrong with America. He stated that it is the duty of the Federal Courts to equalize and protect minorities. No, Sir. The ONLY constitutional duty of the Court is to interpret and uphold the Constitution no matter what other considerations may exist.
Billy Richardson--too dumb to be President. He didn't even know that the Presidential oath of office specifically states that the utmost duty of the President is to uphold and defend the Constitution and to protect it against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Richardson stated that 'human rights' are more important than defending the country's security and upholding the Constitution. What an imbecile.
John Edwards--the Breck girl. Pretty boy, in spite of the fact that he is a lawyer, pays scant attention to the Bill of Rights. He is the one who said that having Internet access, becoming a U.S. citizen, being guaranteed an education, etc, are the most important rights in this country. Never once did he mention the rights delineated in the Bill of Rights. He is also a Socialist who believes government can solve everything, but he gets a few points for holding Mrs. Clinton to some accountability.
Joe Biden--a likable, skillful politician. Too bad he is so liberal. He is masterful in his knowledge of foreign policy issues, but again, his stance is for Socialistic solutions to problems, although not as hardened as Clinton, Obama, or Edwards.
Chris Dodd--DUH!? What a complete and utter waste of time.
Dennis Kucinich--nutty as a fruitcake, crazy as a loon, a neo-Commie to the core, but at least he is consistent and does not try to soften or hide his basic philosophy, unlike Clinton.
With each passing Democratic debate, I become even more convinced that the election of any of these individuals to the Presidency bodes ill for the country.
Friday, November 16, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
Wait till the Republican socialists debate. we can only hope they all eat their own!
BLAH! You won't hear a GOP candidate talking about raising taxes and 'taking profits from businesses' to fund government pet projects, such as the neo-Commie plan to usher in Socialism in the name of 'global warming.'
I thought the funniest/scariest part was when Dodd said national security is more important than defending the Constitution during the panel question about human rights. Then Hillary agreed.
Haven't they been moaning for the last five years about Bush doing just that?
I'm sure they were undecided voters...undecided which socialist to vote for.
illspirit,
Yep, you hit the nail on the head. When it comes to defending the country against all enemies, foreign and domestic, Bush has been doing his job according to the oath of office.
So, Hillary and Dodd are contradicting themselves by criticising Bush for what they themselves would do also.
dwlawson said...
'I'm sure they were undecided voters...undecided which socialist to vote for.'
LOL! You got THAT right!
Wolf and his pack (the Wolfpack) tried their best to describe that audience as 'undecided voters.' My ass. They were partisan as all get-out, and they wasted no time in Bush-bashing.
Wonder how many of the questioners in the audience were 'planted'? I wouldn't be surprised if Hillary collaberated with CNN to do so!
I just checked the CNN polls and they are all like whooo Hillary won the debate, my ass she won, everybody on the stage had a crack at her to which she had NO good responses...that dreamboat sexy hunk of a real man Edwards let her have it...
Did you hear the crowd booing Edwards when he said Hillary took $$ from lobbyists, my God, if that aint the truth. why the hell were they booing that, idiots! yep, those booers were probably planted by Clinton herself. She sucks.
Pris,
Well, you and I agree on something for a change...except for your comments on that asshole Edwards.
Wow,
I can't believe you guys even watch the Democratic Debate. I already know they are a bunch of Socialists and I couldn't care one bit what they have to say. I haven't watched any of the Democrat debates so far- perhaps there is some entertainment value though, I am just now sure if I could make it all the way through it though without being completely disgusted.
Brent,
Believe me I get disgusted alright...often mad as hell.
I watch for 3 basic reasons:
1. To critique the production of the sponsoring news organization AND the candidates.
2. To develop talking points for discussion.
3. To laugh at the clown show.
Post a Comment