UNFIT FOR OFFICE--DEMS HAVE NO PLAN IN IRAQ

The clock is ticking on the time it takes for Democrats in Washington to present a plan for success in Iraq. It is now 1 hour and 30 minutes since Dick Durban gave the Democrat response to President Bush's plan for victory in Iraq. Nothing in Durban's response, nor the diatribes of Senator Blowhard, nor the vitriol of Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reid contains one single hint of an alternative plan for victory.

Their modus operandi? Bash Bush. Cut and run. Withdraw funds from troops. Pass stupid resolutions from the House and Senate Floor denouncing the President's plan...all while our troops are in harm's way.

What idiots.

And yes, they are unpatriotic.

Their words portray a willingness for America to lose. Let's face it. If we leave Iraq now, we all lose, and the world loses. The terrorists win.

Frankly, I am ashamed to live in the same country with these Democrat turncoats who have presented a recipe for failure. They do not live in the same America that I love. In fact, their only motivation for opposing the President's plan is political, period. They don't care about the troops, they don't care that terrorism would be emboldened, they don't care to put the U.S. in greater danger, and they don't care about the citizens who will be at greater risk from terrorist attack if we lose this war. They are engaging in their seditious blather for political expediency only.

As recently as December 17, 2006, many of the Democrats who now threaten to cut funds for our troops because they disagree with the troop surge had themselves supported an increase in U.S. forces. Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, and others are all on record as supporting an increase in troop levels at some time or another throughout this war. Now that the President has come on board with the plan, they attack it.

Scumbags, each and every one.

In addition, the Democrats spent three years lambasting the President's defense team, demanding that Donald Rumsfeld be fired, that Generals who were conducting the war be replaced, etc, etc. All of that has now happened. Rumsfeld and the Generals in charge are out the door. A new team is in place.

So why is it that now all of a sudden, the Democrats are quoting the OLD TEAM that they wanted canned? Suddenly the very people they claimed needed to be replaced are the experts they quote in support of their opposition to the troop surge.

Is there some illogic I smell here?

Actually, in the minds of Democrats who wet the finger and put it in the air to see which way the wind of popular opinion blows, it is perfectly logical. If the President does it, it is wrong, although he is presently doing the very thing they were calling for as late as December of last year.

After all, public opinion APPEARS for now at least to be turning against the war. Thus, demagogues get busy to parrot what they hear in the polls, pure and simple. No patriotism, no stand for principle and ideals, no backbone, no statesmanship.

This should not be a war the President fights alone. Rudy Giuliani had it right tonight when he stated, 'The terrorists started the war. They attacked us. We have no choice in this, we are at war. It is time for Americans to unite in fighting our common enemy that wishes to destroy us. Partisanship should play no role in this whatsoever.'

Cindy Sheehan and her cowardly, anti-American, unpatriotic cohorts in the Democrat party are to be denounced and reprimanded with all our might. Instead of helping us win, they want us to lose.

If it were up to me, they would be expelled from Congress permanently. They are not fit to be in public office.

By the way...that clock is still ticking...still no Democrat plan for victory in Iraq.